Abstract
The purpose of the current chapter is threefold. First, to describe the rationale underlying the use of e-books in literacy development among children at risk for Learning Disabilities (ALD). Several studies demonstrating the e-book’s potential for promoting literacy among this population are also reviewed. The second and third parts of the chapter refer to two recent studies indicating that educational e-books designed specifically for young ALD children can enhance their Vocabulary and Story comprehension. The first study focuses on activity with two modes of educational e-books (with and without embedded metacognitive guidance) in the area of Story comprehension. The second investigates the effect of an intervention program, based on the metacognitive approach, aimed at promoting self-regulated leaning with e-books on Vocabulary and Story comprehension. In the concluding part of the chapter, we discuss the implications of current evidence regarding the e-book’s use for creating inclusive learning environments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Psychological Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-V (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Andersen, H. (2016). The academic and psychological effects of teaching students with learning disabilities to solve problems using cognitive and metacognitive strategies. Master’s thesis, Hamline University. Retrieved from DigitalCommons@Hamline (4112).
Antoniou, F., & Souvignier, E. (2007). Strategy instruction in reading comprehension: An intervention study for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 5, 41–57.
Anuradha, K. T., & Usha, H. S. (2006). E-books access models: A comparative study. The Electronic Library, 24, 662–679.
Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Exploring the foundations of explicit instruction. In K. R. Harris & S. Graham (Eds.), Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching (pp. 1–21). New York: Guilford Press.
Azvedo, R. (2007). Understanding the complex nature of self-regulatory process in learning with computer-based learning environment: An introduction. Metacognition Learning, 2, 57–65.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berkeley, S., Scruggs, T., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2010). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities, 1995–2006: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 423–436.
Blok, H., Oostdam, R., Otter, M. E., & Overmaat, M. (2002). Computer assisted instruction in support of beginning reading instruction: A review. Review of Educational Research, 72, 101–130.
Boyle, J. R., Rosen, S. M., & Forchelli, G. (2016). Exploring metacognitive strategy use during note-taking for students with learning disabilities. Education, 44(2), 3–13.
Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. I, pp. 77–165). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., & Johnsen, S. K. (1997). Test of nonverbal intelligence. Austin: Pro-Ed.
Brueck, J., Lenhart, A. L., & Roskos, A. K. (this volume). Digital reading programs: Definitions, analytic tools and practice examples. In J. Kim & B. Hassinger-Das (Eds.), Reading in the digital age: Young children’s experiences with e-books. Cham: Springer.
Bulgren, J. A., Graner, P. S., & Deshler, D. D. (2013). Literacy challenges and opportunities for students with learning disabilities in social studies and history. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(1), 2–17.
Bus, A. G., Takacs, Z. K., & Kegel, C. A. (2015). Affordances and limitations of electronic storybooks for young children’s emergent literacy. Developmental Review, 35, 79–97.
Bus, A. G., Sari, B., & Takacs, Z. K. (this volume). The promise of multimedia enhancement in children’s storybooks. In J. Kim & B. Hassinger-Das (Eds.), Reading in the digital age: Young children’s experiences with e-books. Cham: Springer.
Chatzipanteli, A., Grammatikopoulos, V., & Gregoriadis, A. (2014). Development and evaluation of metacognition in early childhood education. Early Child Development and Care, 184, 1223–1232.
Chera, P., & Wood, C. (2003). Animated multimedia “talking books” can promote phonological awareness in children beginning to read. Learning and Instruction, 13, 33–52.
Chinnappan, M., & Chandler, P. (2010). Managing cognitive load in the mathematics classroom. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 66(1), 5–11.
Clements, D. H. (2002). Computers in early childhood mathematics. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3, 160–181.
Cooper, L. Z. (2005). Developmentally appropriate digital environments for young children. Library Trends, 54, 286–302.
Coyne, M. D., McCoach, D. B., & Kapp, S. (2007). Vocabulary intervention for kindergarten students: Comparing extended instruction to embedded instruction and incidental exposure. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 74–89.
de Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2002). Quality of book-reading matters for emergent readers: An experiment with the same book in a regular or electronic format. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 145–155.
de Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2003). How well suited are electronic books to supporting literacy? Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3, 147–164.
de Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2004). The efficacy of electronic books in fostering kindergarten children’s emergent story understanding. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 378–393.
Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2002). Off-line metacognition: A domain-specific retardation in young children with learning disabilities? Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 123–139.
Diamond, K. E., & Powell, D. R. (2016). Developing literacy and language competence: Preschool children who are at risk or have disabilities. In B. Reichow, B. A. Boyd, E. E. Barton, & S. L. Odom (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood special education (pp. 125–143). Cham: Springer.
Doty, D. E., Popplewell, S. R., & Byers, G. O. (2001). Interactive CD-ROM storybooks and young readers’ reading comprehension. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 374–384.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test revised. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-development inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
Garrett, A., Mazzocco, M., & Baker, L. (2006). Development of the metacognitive skills of prediction and evaluation in children with or without math disability. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21, 77–88.
Geva, A. (2010). Ethical aspects of dual coding: Implications for multimedia ethics training in business. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 7, 5–24.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In H. L. Swanson (Ed.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323–334). New York: Guilford Press.
Haughbrook, R., Hart, S. A., Schatschneider, C., & Taylor, J. (2017). Genetic and environmental influences on early literacy skills across school grade contexts. Developmental Science, 20, e12434.
Hebbeler, K., & Spiker, D. (2016). Supporting young children with disabilities. The Future of Children, 26, 185–205.
Hessels-Schlatter, C., Hessels, M. G. P., Godin, H., & Spillmann-Rojas, H. (2017). Fostering self-regulated learning: From clinical to whole class interventions. Educational & Child Psychology, 34(1), 110–125.
Hetzroni, O. E. (2004). Literacy and assistive technology for children with special needs. Script, 7–8, 195–218. in Hebrew.
Hitchcock, C. H., & Noonan, M. J. (2000). Computer-assisted instruction of early academic skills. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 145–158.
Huffstetter, M., King, J. R., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Schneider, J. J., & Powell-Smith, K. A. (2010). Effects of a computer-based early reading program on the early reading and oral language skills of at-risk preschool children. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 15(4), 279–298.
Hughes, C. A., Morris, J. R., Therrien, W. J., & Benson, S. K. (2017). Explicit instruction: Historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32, 140–148.
Hutinger, P., Bell, C., Daytner, G., & Johnson, J. (2005). Disseminating and replicating an effective emerging literacy. In Technology curriculum: A final report. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services.
Ihmeideh, F. M. (2014). The effect of electronic books on enhancing emergent literacy skills of pre-school children. Computers & Education, 79, 40–48.
Johnson, B. (2017). Learning disabilities in children: Epidemiology, risk factors and importance of early intervention. BMH Medical Journal, 4(1), 31–37.
Kim, M. K., McKenna, J. W., & Park, Y. (2017). The use of computer-assisted instruction to improve the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities: An evaluation of the evidence base according to the what works clearinghouse standards. Remedial and Special Education, 38, 233–245.
Kirk, S. A., McCarthy, J. J., & Kirk, W. D. (1968). Illinois test of psycholinguistic abilities. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Kiru, E. W., Doabler, C. T., Sorrells, A. M., & Cooc, N. A. (2017). A synthesis of technology-mediated mathematics interventions for students with or at risk for mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417745835.
Klassen, R. (2010). Confidence to manage learning. The self-regulated learning of early adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 19–30.
Korat, O. (2010). Reading electronic books as a support for vocabulary, story comprehension and word reading in kindergarten and first grade. Computers & Education, 55, 24–31.
Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2004). Do Hebrew electronic books differ from Dutch electronic books? A replication of a Dutch content analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 257–268.
Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2007). Electronic books versus adult readers: Effects on children’s emergent literacy as a function of social class. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 248–259.
Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2008). The educational electronic book as a tool for supporting children’s emergent literacy in low versus middle SES group. Computers & Education, 50, 110–124.
Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2012). Direct and indirect teaching: Using e-books for supporting vocabulary, word reading, and story comprehension for young children. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(2), 135–152.
Korat, O., Shamir, A., & Arbiv, L. (2011). E-books as support for emergent writing with and without adult assistance. Education and Information Technologies, 16, 301–318.
Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 97–114.
Kuder, S. J. (2017). Vocabulary instruction for secondary students with reading disabilities: An updated research review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40(3), 155–164.
Labbo, L. D. (2000). 12 things young children can do with a talking book in a classroom computer center. The Reading Teacher, 53, 542–546.
Labbo, L. D. (2005). Technology in literacy: Books and computer response activities that support literacy. The Reading Teacher, 59, 288–292.
Lefever-Davis, S., & Pearman, C. (2005). Early readers and electronic texts: CD-ROM storybook features that influence reading behaviors. The Reading Teacher, 58, 446–454.
Lewin, C. (2000). Exploring the effects of talking book software in UK primary classrooms. Journal of Research in Reading, 23, 149–157.
Lipka, O., Lesaux, N. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2006). Retrospective analyses of the reading development of Grade 4 students with reading disabilities: Risk status and profiles over five years. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 364–378.
Lonigan, C. J., Burgess, S. R., & Anthony, J. L. (2000). Development of emergent literacy and early reading skills in preschool children: Evidence from a latent-variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 36(5), 596–613.
Lonigan, C. J., Farver, J. M., Phillips, B. M., & Clancy-Menchetti, J. (2011). Promoting the development of preschool children’s emergent literacy skills: A randomized evaluation of a literacy-focused curriculum and two professional development models. Reading and Writing, 24, 305–337.
Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., Steinbach, K., & De Palma, M. (2014). Development and evaluation of a research-based intervention program for children and adolescents with reading disabilities. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 40(3), 21–31.
Margalit, M. (2014). Designing policy principles for the treatment of students with learning disabilities. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education and Culture. Hebrew.
Martini, R., & Shore, B. M. (2008). Pointing to parallels in ability-related differences in the use of metacognition in academic and psychomotor tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 237–224.
Mason, L. H., Meadan, H., Hedin, L., & Corso, L. (2006). Self-regulated strategy development instruction for expository text comprehension. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 47–52.
Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125–139.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 183–200). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Milburn, T. F., Lonigan, C. J., Allan, D. M., & Phillips, B. M. (2017). Agreement among traditional and RTI-based definitions of reading-related learning disability with preschool children. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 120–129.
Moura, O., Simões, M. R., & Pereira, M. (2014). Executive functioning in children with developmental dyslexia. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(Suppl 1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2014.96432.
Neuman, S. B. (2009). The case for multi-media presentation in learning: A theory of synergy. In A. G. Bus & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Multimedia and literacy development: Improving achievement for young learners (pp. 44–56). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Özsoya, G., & Ataman, A. (2009). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on mathematical problem solving achievement. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(2), 67–82.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Paraskevopoulos, J. N., & Kirk, S. A. (1969). The development and psychometric chrematistics of the revised Illinois test of psycholinguistic abilities. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Pearman, C. (2008). Independent reading of CD-ROM storybook. The Reading Teacher, 61, 594–602.
Pears, K. C., Kim, H. K., Fisher, P. A., & Yoerger, K. (2016). Increasing pre-kindergarten early literacy skills in children with developmental disabilities and delays. Journal of School Psychology, 57, 15–27.
Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory Into Practice, 41, 219–225.
Roskos, K., Burstein, K., You, B., Brueck, J., & O’Brien, C. (2011). A formative study of an e-book instructional model in early literacy. Creative Education, 2, 10–17.
Segers, E., Takke, L., & Verhoeven, L. (2004). Teacher-mediated versus computer mediated storybook reading to children in native and multicultural kindergarten classrooms. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 215–226.
Shamir, A. (2009). Processes and outcomes of joint activity with e-books for promoting kindergarteners’ emergent literacy. Educational Media International, 46, 81–96.
Shamir, A., & Korat, O. (2007). Developing educational e-book for fostering kindergarten children’s emergent literacy. Computer in the School, 24, 125–143.
Shamir, A., & Korat, O. (2015). Educational electronic books for supporting emergent literacy of kindergarteners at-risk for reading difficulties—What do we know so far? Computers in the Schools, 32, 105–121.
Shamir, A., & Lifshitz, I. (2013). E-books for supporting the emergent literacy and emergent math of children at risk for learning disabilities: Can metacognitive guidance make a difference? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28, 33–48.
Shamir, A., & Margalit, M. (2011). Technology and students with special educational needs: New opportunities and future directions. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 26(3), 279–282.
Shamir, A., Korat, O., & Barbi, N. (2008). The effects of CD-ROM storybook reading on low SES kindergarteners’ emergent literacy as a function of learning context. Computers & Education, 51, 354–367.
Shamir, A., Korat, O., & Shlafer, I. (2011). The effect of activity with e-book on vocabulary and story comprehension: A comparison between kindergarteners at risk of LD and typically developing kindergarten. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 26, 311–322.
Shamir, A., Korat, O., & Fellah, R. (2012). Promoting vocabulary, phonological awareness and concept about print among children at risk for learning disabilities: Can e-books help? Reading and Writing, 25, 45–69.
Shamir, A., Segal-Drori, O., & Goren, I. (2017). Educational electronic book activity supports language retention among children at risk for learning disabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 1–22.
Skarakis-Doyle, E., Dempsey, L., & Lee, C. (2008). Identifying language comprehension impairment in preschool children. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 54–65.
Solis, M., Ciullo, S., Vaughn, S., Pyle, N., Hassaram, B., & Leroux, A. (2012). Reading comprehension interventions for middle school students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of 30 years of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 327–340.
Stetter, M. E., & Hughes, M. T. (2010). Using story grammar to assist students with learning disabilities and reading difficulties improve their comprehension. Education and Treatment of Children, 33(1), 115–151.
Swanson, H. L., & Sachs-Lee, C. (2000). A meta-analysis of single-subject-design intervention research for students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 114–113.
Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sweller, J. (2016). Cognitive load theory, evolutionary educational psychology, and instructional design. In D. C. Geary & D. B. Berch (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on child development and education (pp. 291–307). Cham: Springer.
Takacs, Z. K., Swart, E. K., & Bus, A. G. (2015). Benefits and pitfalls of multimedia and interactive features in technology-enhanced storybooks: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85, 698–739.
Toll, S. W. M., Van der Ven, S. H. G., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2011). Executive functions as predictors of math learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219410387302.
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Herron, J., & Lindamood, P. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction to prevent early reading difficulties in student at risk for dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 60(1), 40–56.
Van Daal, V. H. P., Sandvik, J. M., & Adèr, H. J. (this volume). A meta-analysis of multimedia applications: How effective are interventions with e-books, computer-assisted instruction and TV/video on literacy learning? In J. Kim & B. Hassinger-Das (Eds.), Reading in the digital age: Young children’s experiences with e-books. Cham: Springer.
Varvara, P., Varuzza, C., Sorrentino, A. C. P., Vicari, S., & Menghini, D. (2014). Executive functions in developmental dyslexia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00120.
Veenman, M. V. J. (2012). Metacognition in science education: Definitions, constituents, and their intricate relation with cognition. In A. Zokar & Y. J. Drori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education (Contemporary trends and issues in science education) (Vol. 40, pp. 21–37). Dordrecht: Springer.
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.0012014.
Vernadakis, N., Avgerinos, A., Tsitskari, E., & Zachopoulou, E. (2005). The use of computer assisted instruction in preschool education. Early Childhood Journal, 33, 99–104.
Ward, J. (2006). The executive brain. In J. Ward (Ed.), The student’s guide to cognitive neuroscience (pp. 283–307). New York: Psychology Press.
Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69, 848–872.
Wong, B. Y. L. (1986). Metacognition and special education: A review of a view. The Journal of Special Education, 20, 9–29.
Wong, B. Y. L. (1987). How do the results of metacognitive research impact on the learning disabled individual? Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 189–195.
Wong, B. Y. L., Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Butler, D. L. (2003). Cognitive strategies instruction research in learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 383–402). New York: Guilford Press.
Wood, C. (2005). Beginning reader’s use of “talking books” software can affect their reading strategies. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 170–182.
Zepeda, C. D., Richey, J. E., Ronevich, P., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2015). Direct instruction of metacognition benefits adolescent science learning, transfer, and motivation: An in vivo study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 954–970.
Zipke, M. (2017). Preschoolers explore interactive storybook apps: The effect on word recognition and story comprehension. Educational Information Technology, 22, 1695–1712.
Zucker, T. A., Moody, A. K., & McKenna, M. C. (2009). The effects of electronic books on pre-kindergarten-to-grade 5 students’ literacy and language outcomes: A research synthesis. Educational Computing Research, 40, 47–87.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shamir, A., Dushnitzky, G. (2019). Metacognitive Intervention with e-Books to Promote Vocabulary and Story Comprehension Among Children at Risk for Learning Disabilities. In: Kim, J.E., Hassinger-Das, B. (eds) Reading in the Digital Age: Young Children’s Experiences with E-books. Literacy Studies, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20077-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20077-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20076-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20077-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)