Game-Based Student Response System Applied to a Multidisciplinary Teaching Context

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 951)


The prevailing need to promote the application of active methodologies to develop the teaching-learning process in an effective way led to this work. The aim was to evidence the efficiency of an Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) resource for the generation of a collaborative and multidisciplinary context in the university teaching activity within dissimilar fields of knowledge. A Game-based Student Response System (GSRS) was implemented as a common tool for different teachers of non-related fields of knowledge with a view to enhance critical thinking and engagement in the students. The outcomes showed that this methodology increased the involvement and reduced part of the degree of abstraction that complex contents entail. Thus, the environment varied significantly with respect to the traditional relationship between students and teachers, since the latter are in charge of generating student-centred experiences based on interaction. As a result, feedback information was gathered in order to rearrange contents and consider novel strategies. In addition, this work eased the acquisition of knowledge, competence development and the achievement of teaching objectives by the students.


Game-based Student Response System (GSRS) Multidisciplinary context Teaching innovation Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) 



The authors would like to thank the University of Seville for funding the Second Own Plan for Teaching Innovation (2016) which has supported this research.


  1. 1.
    Barreras, M.A.: Experiencia de la clase inversa en didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras. Educatio Siglo XXI 34(1), 173–196 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brand, J., Brooker, J., Furuseth, A., Versvik, M.: “Kahoot!”. Oslo (2019). Accessed Jan 2019
  3. 3.
    Cabero-Almenara, J.: ¿Qué debemos aprender de las pasadas investigaciones en Tecnología Educativa? RIITE. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa. 0, 23–33 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caldwell, J.E.: Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 6(1), 9–20 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Castillo-Manzano, J.I., Castro-Nuño, M., López-Valpuesta, L., Sanz-Díaz, M.T., Yñíguez, R.: To take or not to take the laptop or tablet to classes, that is the question. Comput. Hum. Behav. 68, 326–333 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fotaris, P., Mastoras, T., Leinfellner, R., Rosunally, Y.: Climbing up the leaderboard: an empirical study of applying gamification techniques to a computer programming class. Electron. J. e-Learning 14(2), 94–110 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Halverson, R., Smith, A.: How new technologies have (and have not) changed teaching and learning in schools. J. Comput. Teacher Educ. 26(2), 49–54 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hue, L.T., Ab Jalil, H.: Attitudes towards ICT integration into curriculum and usage among university lectures in Vietnam. Int. J. Instr. 6(2), 53–66 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jiménez-García, M., Martínez-Ortega, M.A.: El Uso de una Aplicación Móvil en la Enseñanza de la Lectura. Inf. Tecnol. 28(1), 151–160 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kay, R.H., LeSage, A.: Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: a review of the literature. Comput. Educ. 53(3), 819–827 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Malone, T.W.: What makes things fun to learn? Heuristics for designing instructional computer games. In: The 3rd ACM SIGSMALL Symposium and the First SIGPC Symposium on Small Systems. ACM Press, Palo Alto (1980)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marqués, P.: Impacto de las TIC en la educación: funciones y limitaciones. 3c TIC: Cuadernos de Desarrollo Aplicados a las TIC, vol. 3, pp. 1–15 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martínez, P., Pérez, J., Martínez, M.: Las TICS y el entorno virtual para la tutoría universitaria. Educación XXI: Revista de la Facultad de Educación 19(1), 287–310 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martínez-Galiano, J.M., Amaro, P., Gálvez-Toro, A., Delgado-Rodríguez, M.: Metodología basada en tecnología de la información y la comunicación para resolver los nuevos retos en la formación de los profesionales de la salud. Educación Médica 17(1), 20–24 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martins Dos Santos, G., Mourão, R.G.: ICT in Education: personal learning environments in perspectives and practices of young people. Educação e Pesquisa AHEAD 21, 1–20 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mirate, A.B., García, F.A.: Rendimiento académico y TIC. Una experiencia con webs didácticas en la Universidad de Murcia. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación 44, 169–183 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Muñoz-Carril, P., Fuentes, E.J., González-Sanmamed, M.: Necesidades formativas del profesorado universitario en infografía y multimedia. Revista de Investigación Educativa. 30(2), 303–321 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pérez-Suárez, M., Antón, D., Amaro-Mellado, J.L.: Las TIC como recurso docente de convergencia entre distintas áreas de conocimiento. In: TIC Actualizadas Para Una Nueva Docencia Universitaria, pp. 611–629. McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España, S.L. (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pintor, E., Gargantilla, P., Herreros, B., López, M.: Kahoot en docencia: una alternativa practica a los clickers. In: XI Jornadas Internacionales de Innovación Universitaria. Educar para transformar, Madrid, 7–8 July 2014Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ramírez-Juidías, E., Tejero-Manzanares, J., Amaro-Mellado, J.L., Ridao-Ceballos, L.: Developing experimental learning in a graphical course using Thrustone’s law of comparative judgment. Eng. Lett. 25(1), 61–67 (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Révészová, L.: Development of information competencies via process modelling and ICT integration. In: 36th International Convention IEEE Information and Communication, Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), 20–24 May, Opatija (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ricoy, M.C., Couto, M.J.V.S.: Best practices with ICT and the value attributed by the students newly integrated in university. Educação e Pesquisa 40(4), 897–912 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ricoy, M.C., Fernández, J.: Contributions and controversies generated by the use of ICT in higher education: a case study. Revista de Educación 360, 509–532 (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rubio-Escudero, C., Asencio-Cortés, G., Martínez-Álvarez, F., Troncoso, A., Riquelme, J.C.: Impact of auto-evaluation tests as part of the continuous evaluation in programming courses. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 771, pp. 553–561 (2018)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang, A.I.: Extensive evaluation of using a game project in a software architecture course. ACM Trans. on Comput. Educ. (TOCE) 11(1), 1–28 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang, A.I.: The wear out effect of a game-based student response system. Comput. Educ. 82, 217–227 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yildiz, B., Usluel, Y.: A model proposal on ICT integration for effective mathematics instruction. Hacettepe Egitim Dergisi 31(1), 14–33 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Graphic EngineeringUniversity of SevilleSevilleSpain
  2. 2.Department of Graphic Expression and Building EngineeringUniversity of SevilleSevilleSpain
  3. 3.The Creative and Virtual Technologies Research Laboratory, School of Architecture, Design and the Built EnvironmentNottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK
  4. 4.Department of Applied Economy IIIUniversity of SevilleSevilleSpain
  5. 5.Data Science & Big Data LabPablo de Olavide UniversitySevilleSpain

Personalised recommendations