Skip to main content

Innovative Tools for Teaching Marine Robotics, IoT and Control Strategies Since the Primary School

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smart Learning with Educational Robotics

Abstract

Digital skills are becoming increasingly central to the educational policy of every country and educational systems are facing new challenges in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. All pupils should gain the knowledge, skills and competences they need, as they determine an individual’s chance to succeed in the future labour market and to have an active role in the future society. In the last decade, a lot of projects showed how educational robotics (ER) can be a powerful tool for teaching basic skills and STEAM (science, technology, engineering, art and mathematics) subjects.

This chapter will present OpenFISH.science, a project developed to teach robotics, STEM and Internet of things (IoT). Moreover, by directly involving people in themes about the marine environment, it will raise awareness and provide knowledge on RoboEthics, blue careers and ocean literacy. OpenFISH.science could empower students since the primary school to build and create distributed control systems and experiences by means of lessons and its wireless electronic building blocks and software.

Presenting curricula based on ER and constructionism that will use specific toolkits to engage (mainly) primary school kids (ages 6–12), this chapter is intended as a contribution for researchers, policymakers and everyday teachers that endeavour to help students in primary education to develop their mind and personality, as they will be their best resources to participate actively, responsibly and successfully throughout their lives in society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ER:

Educational robotics

eSTrEM:

environment, Science, Technology, robotics, Engineering and Math

ISCED:

International Standard Classification of Education

IoT:

Internet of things

OECD:

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

STEM:

Science, technology, engineering and mathematics

STEAM:

Science, technology, engineering, art and mathematics

UNESCO:

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

References

  • Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget’s constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: What’s the difference. Future of learning group publication, 5(3), 438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albayrak, S., Wollny, S., Varone, N., Lommatzsch, A., & Milosevic, D. (2005, March). Agent technology for personalized information filtering: The PIA-system. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on Applied computing (pp. 54–59). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alimisis, D., & Moro, M. (2016). Special issue on educational robotics. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 77(C), 74–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 58(3), 978–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berland, M., Martin, T., Benton, T., Petrick Smith, C., & Davis, D. (2013). Using learning analytics to understand the learning pathways of novice programmers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(4), 564–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blikstein, P., Worsley, M., Piech, C., Sahami, M., Cooper, S., & Koller, D. (2014). Programming pluralism: Using learning analytics to detect patterns in the learning of computer programming. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 561–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dresner, K., & Stone, P. (2005, July). Multiagent traffic management: An improved intersection control mechanism. In Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 471–477). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1994, June). Learning through system dynamics as preparation for the 21st century. In Keynote address for systems thinking and dynamic modeling conference for K-12 education (pp. 27–29). Concord, MA: Concord Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indicazioni nazionali per il curricolo (2012). Italian Administrative Order 16/11/2012 n. 254 “National guidelines for the kindergarten (scuola dell’infanzia) and for the primary school (scuola primaria)”. Retrieved from http://www.indicazioninazionali.it/2018/08/26/indicazioni-2012/

  • Indicazioni per il curricolo (2007). Italian Administrative Order 31/07/2007 “National guidelines for the kindergarten (scuola dell’infanzia) and primary school (scuola primaria)”. Retrieved from https://archivio.pubblica.istruzione.it/news/2007/indicazioni_nazionali.shtml

  • INVALSI (2018). The INVALSI test according to INVALSI. Retrieved from https://invalsi-areaprove.cineca.it/docs/2018/INVALSI_tests_according_to_INVALSI.pdf

  • INVALSI (n.d.). Retrieved from https://invalsi-areaprove.cineca.it/index.php?get=static&pag=precedenti_risultati

  • Jormanainen, I., & Sutinen, E. (2012, March). Using data mining to support teacher’s intervention in a robotics class. In 2012 IEEE fourth international conference on Digital game and intelligent toy enhanced learning (DIGITEL) (pp. 39–46). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandlhofer, M., Steinbauer, G., Sundström, P., & Weiss, A. (2012). Evaluating the long-term impact of RoboCupJunior: A first investigation. In D. Obdrzalek (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on robotics in education, RiE2012 (pp. 87–94). Prague: MatfyzPress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karim, M. E., Lemaignan, S., & Mondada, F. (2015, June). A review: Can robots reshape K-12 STEM education? In 2015 IEEE international workshop on Advanced robotics and its social impacts (ARSO) (pp. 1–8). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morganti, G., Perdon, A. M., Conte, G., & Scaradozzi, D. (2009). Multi-agent system theory for modelling a home automation system. In J. Cabestany, F. Sandoval, A. Prieto, & J. M. Corchado (Eds.), Bio-inspired systems: Computational and ambient intelligence. IWANN 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 5517, pp. 585–593). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S. G., Cooper, K. B., & Djapic, V. (2015, May). SeaPerch: How a start-up hands-on robotics activity grew into a national program. In OCEANS 2015-Genova (pp. 1–3). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms – Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. Construction, 36(2), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadro di riferimento (n.d.). Italian Ministry of Education’s reference scheme for building a curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.invalsi.it/snv2012/documenti/QDR/QdR_Mat_I_ciclo.pdf

  • Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council (2006). Retrieved from http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2006/962/oj

  • Rilevazioni nazionali degli apprendimenti 2014-15 (n.d.). Italian Ministry of Education’s education monitoring surveys. Retrieved from https://invalsi-areaprove.cineca.it/docs/attach/035_Rapporto_Prove_INVALSI_2015.pdf

  • Rohwedder, W.J. (1990). Computer-aided environmental education. Series: Monographs in environmental education and environmental studies. Grades: K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Post-Sec. ENC-013496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwedder, W. J. (1999). Environmental education goes high-tech. Nature (Human), 4(1), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwedder, W. J., & Alm, A. (1994). Using computers in environmental education: Interactive multimedia and on-line learning. The Environmental Education Toolbox--EE Toolbox Workshop Resource Manual.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaradozzi, D., Sorbi, L., Pedale, A., Valzano, M., & Vergine, C. (2015). Teaching robotics at the primary school: An innovative approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3838–3846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scaradozzi, D., Screpanti, L., Cesaretti, L., Mazzieri, E., Storti, M., Brandoni, M., & Longhi, A. (2016). Rethink Loreto: We build our smart city! A stem education experience for introducing smart city concept with the educational robotics. In 9th annual international conference of education, research and innovation (ICERI 2016), Seville, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaradozzi, D., Screpanti, L., Cesaretti, L., Storti, M., & Mazzieri, E. (2018). Implementation and assessment methodologies of teachers’ training courses for STEM activities. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaradozzi, D., Screpanti, L., Cesaretti, L. (in press) Towards a definition of educational robotics: a classification of tools, experiences and assessments. In: Daniela, L. (Ed.),Smart learning with educational robotics – using robots to scaffold learning outcomes, Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-19912-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Screpanti, L., Cesaretti, L., Storti, M., Mazzieri, E., & Longhi, A. (2018a). Advancing K12 education through Educational Robotics to shape the citizens of the future. In Proceeding of DIDAMATICA 2018. AICA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Screpanti, L., Cesaretti, L., Marchetti, L., Baione, A., Natalucci, I. N., & Scaradozzi, D. (2018b). An educational robotics activity to promote gender equality in STEM education. In Proccedings of the eighteenth International Conference on Information, Communication Technologies in Education (ICICTE 2018) (pp. 336–346), Chania, Crete, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small-scale underwater glider (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.seaglide.net/about/

  • Stambaugh, B. (2015, April). Waterbotics: Pooling students to stem. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (Vol. 17).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sycara, K., Pannu, A., Williamson, M., Zeng, D., & Decker, K. (1996). Distributed intelligent agents. IEEE Expert-Intelligent Systems and their Applications, 11(6), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/64.546581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma, A. K., Dickerson, D., & McKinney, S. (2011). Engaging students in STEM careers with project-based learning – MarineTech project. Technology & Engineering Teacher, 71(1), 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veruggio, G., Operto, F., & Bekey, G. (2016). RoboEthics: Social and ethical implications. In Springer handbook of robotics (pp. 2135–2160). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Sy, A., Liu, L., & Piech, C. (2017). Learning to represent student knowledge on programming exercises using deep learning. In Proceedings of the 10th International conference on educational data mining (pp. 324–329), Wuhan, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, O., & Resnick, M. (2003, April). A physical interface for system dynamics simulation. In CHI’03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 810–811). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Scaradozzi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Scaradozzi, D., Cesaretti, L., Screpanti, L., Costa, D., Zingaretti, S., Valzano, M. (2019). Innovative Tools for Teaching Marine Robotics, IoT and Control Strategies Since the Primary School. In: Daniela, L. (eds) Smart Learning with Educational Robotics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19913-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19913-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19912-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19913-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics