Abstract
Digital skills are becoming increasingly central to the educational policy of every country and educational systems are facing new challenges in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. All pupils should gain the knowledge, skills and competences they need, as they determine an individual’s chance to succeed in the future labour market and to have an active role in the future society. In the last decade, a lot of projects showed how educational robotics (ER) can be a powerful tool for teaching basic skills and STEAM (science, technology, engineering, art and mathematics) subjects.
This chapter will present OpenFISH.science, a project developed to teach robotics, STEM and Internet of things (IoT). Moreover, by directly involving people in themes about the marine environment, it will raise awareness and provide knowledge on RoboEthics, blue careers and ocean literacy. OpenFISH.science could empower students since the primary school to build and create distributed control systems and experiences by means of lessons and its wireless electronic building blocks and software.
Presenting curricula based on ER and constructionism that will use specific toolkits to engage (mainly) primary school kids (ages 6–12), this chapter is intended as a contribution for researchers, policymakers and everyday teachers that endeavour to help students in primary education to develop their mind and personality, as they will be their best resources to participate actively, responsibly and successfully throughout their lives in society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- ER:
-
Educational robotics
- eSTrEM:
-
environment, Science, Technology, robotics, Engineering and Math
- ISCED:
-
International Standard Classification of Education
- IoT:
-
Internet of things
- OECD:
-
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
- STEM:
-
Science, technology, engineering and mathematics
- STEAM:
-
Science, technology, engineering, art and mathematics
- UNESCO:
-
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
References
Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget’s constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: What’s the difference. Future of learning group publication, 5(3), 438.
Albayrak, S., Wollny, S., Varone, N., Lommatzsch, A., & Milosevic, D. (2005, March). Agent technology for personalized information filtering: The PIA-system. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on Applied computing (pp. 54–59). ACM.
Alimisis, D., & Moro, M. (2016). Special issue on educational robotics. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 77(C), 74–75.
Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 58(3), 978–988.
Berland, M., Martin, T., Benton, T., Petrick Smith, C., & Davis, D. (2013). Using learning analytics to understand the learning pathways of novice programmers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(4), 564–599.
Blikstein, P., Worsley, M., Piech, C., Sahami, M., Cooper, S., & Koller, D. (2014). Programming pluralism: Using learning analytics to detect patterns in the learning of computer programming. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 561–599.
Dresner, K., & Stone, P. (2005, July). Multiagent traffic management: An improved intersection control mechanism. In Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 471–477). ACM.
Forrester, J. W. (1994, June). Learning through system dynamics as preparation for the 21st century. In Keynote address for systems thinking and dynamic modeling conference for K-12 education (pp. 27–29). Concord, MA: Concord Academy.
Indicazioni nazionali per il curricolo (2012). Italian Administrative Order 16/11/2012 n. 254 “National guidelines for the kindergarten (scuola dell’infanzia) and for the primary school (scuola primaria)”. Retrieved from http://www.indicazioninazionali.it/2018/08/26/indicazioni-2012/
Indicazioni per il curricolo (2007). Italian Administrative Order 31/07/2007 “National guidelines for the kindergarten (scuola dell’infanzia) and primary school (scuola primaria)”. Retrieved from https://archivio.pubblica.istruzione.it/news/2007/indicazioni_nazionali.shtml
INVALSI (2018). The INVALSI test according to INVALSI. Retrieved from https://invalsi-areaprove.cineca.it/docs/2018/INVALSI_tests_according_to_INVALSI.pdf
INVALSI (n.d.). Retrieved from https://invalsi-areaprove.cineca.it/index.php?get=static&pag=precedenti_risultati
Jormanainen, I., & Sutinen, E. (2012, March). Using data mining to support teacher’s intervention in a robotics class. In 2012 IEEE fourth international conference on Digital game and intelligent toy enhanced learning (DIGITEL) (pp. 39–46). IEEE.
Kandlhofer, M., Steinbauer, G., Sundström, P., & Weiss, A. (2012). Evaluating the long-term impact of RoboCupJunior: A first investigation. In D. Obdrzalek (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on robotics in education, RiE2012 (pp. 87–94). Prague: MatfyzPress.
Karim, M. E., Lemaignan, S., & Mondada, F. (2015, June). A review: Can robots reshape K-12 STEM education? In 2015 IEEE international workshop on Advanced robotics and its social impacts (ARSO) (pp. 1–8). IEEE.
Morganti, G., Perdon, A. M., Conte, G., & Scaradozzi, D. (2009). Multi-agent system theory for modelling a home automation system. In J. Cabestany, F. Sandoval, A. Prieto, & J. M. Corchado (Eds.), Bio-inspired systems: Computational and ambient intelligence. IWANN 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 5517, pp. 585–593). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Nelson, S. G., Cooper, K. B., & Djapic, V. (2015, May). SeaPerch: How a start-up hands-on robotics activity grew into a national program. In OCEANS 2015-Genova (pp. 1–3). IEEE.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms – Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Book.
Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. Construction, 36(2), 1–11.
Quadro di riferimento (n.d.). Italian Ministry of Education’s reference scheme for building a curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.invalsi.it/snv2012/documenti/QDR/QdR_Mat_I_ciclo.pdf
Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council (2006). Retrieved from http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2006/962/oj
Rilevazioni nazionali degli apprendimenti 2014-15 (n.d.). Italian Ministry of Education’s education monitoring surveys. Retrieved from https://invalsi-areaprove.cineca.it/docs/attach/035_Rapporto_Prove_INVALSI_2015.pdf
Rohwedder, W.J. (1990). Computer-aided environmental education. Series: Monographs in environmental education and environmental studies. Grades: K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Post-Sec. ENC-013496.
Rohwedder, W. J. (1999). Environmental education goes high-tech. Nature (Human), 4(1), 1–2.
Rohwedder, W. J., & Alm, A. (1994). Using computers in environmental education: Interactive multimedia and on-line learning. The Environmental Education Toolbox--EE Toolbox Workshop Resource Manual.
Scaradozzi, D., Sorbi, L., Pedale, A., Valzano, M., & Vergine, C. (2015). Teaching robotics at the primary school: An innovative approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3838–3846.
Scaradozzi, D., Screpanti, L., Cesaretti, L., Mazzieri, E., Storti, M., Brandoni, M., & Longhi, A. (2016). Rethink Loreto: We build our smart city! A stem education experience for introducing smart city concept with the educational robotics. In 9th annual international conference of education, research and innovation (ICERI 2016), Seville, Spain.
Scaradozzi, D., Screpanti, L., Cesaretti, L., Storti, M., & Mazzieri, E. (2018). Implementation and assessment methodologies of teachers’ training courses for STEM activities. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1–21.
Scaradozzi, D., Screpanti, L., Cesaretti, L. (in press) Towards a definition of educational robotics: a classification of tools, experiences and assessments. In: Daniela, L. (Ed.),Smart learning with educational robotics – using robots to scaffold learning outcomes, Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-19912-8.
Screpanti, L., Cesaretti, L., Storti, M., Mazzieri, E., & Longhi, A. (2018a). Advancing K12 education through Educational Robotics to shape the citizens of the future. In Proceeding of DIDAMATICA 2018. AICA.
Screpanti, L., Cesaretti, L., Marchetti, L., Baione, A., Natalucci, I. N., & Scaradozzi, D. (2018b). An educational robotics activity to promote gender equality in STEM education. In Proccedings of the eighteenth International Conference on Information, Communication Technologies in Education (ICICTE 2018) (pp. 336–346), Chania, Crete, Greece.
Small-scale underwater glider (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.seaglide.net/about/
Stambaugh, B. (2015, April). Waterbotics: Pooling students to stem. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (Vol. 17).
Sycara, K., Pannu, A., Williamson, M., Zeng, D., & Decker, K. (1996). Distributed intelligent agents. IEEE Expert-Intelligent Systems and their Applications, 11(6), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/64.546581.
Verma, A. K., Dickerson, D., & McKinney, S. (2011). Engaging students in STEM careers with project-based learning – MarineTech project. Technology & Engineering Teacher, 71(1), 25–31.
Veruggio, G., Operto, F., & Bekey, G. (2016). RoboEthics: Social and ethical implications. In Springer handbook of robotics (pp. 2135–2160). Cham: Springer.
Wang, L., Sy, A., Liu, L., & Piech, C. (2017). Learning to represent student knowledge on programming exercises using deep learning. In Proceedings of the 10th International conference on educational data mining (pp. 324–329), Wuhan, China.
Zuckerman, O., & Resnick, M. (2003, April). A physical interface for system dynamics simulation. In CHI’03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 810–811). ACM.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scaradozzi, D., Cesaretti, L., Screpanti, L., Costa, D., Zingaretti, S., Valzano, M. (2019). Innovative Tools for Teaching Marine Robotics, IoT and Control Strategies Since the Primary School. In: Daniela, L. (eds) Smart Learning with Educational Robotics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19913-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19913-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19912-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19913-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)