Skip to main content

Biological Markers for Outcome and Recovery in Schizophrenia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Schizophrenia Treatment Outcomes

Abstract

Diagnosis, evaluating symptom changes, and prognosis in schizophrenia are primarily based on complete history, structured interviews, and rating scales. Biomarkers are objectively measured indicators of normal biological or pathological processes which might indicate the presence and severity of an illness. Though the evidence for its clinical utility in predicting outcome and recovery in schizophrenia is still in its infancy, it is worthwhile to review available markers to enhance the understanding of this heterogeneous disorder. In this chapter we attempt to consolidate various clinical, neurochemical, neurophysiological, neuroimaging, neurocognitive, and inflammatory markers that are shown to be associated with illness presentation, symptom severity, and outcome in schizophrenia. Combining cost-effective, multimodal, clinically meaningful markers looks like a promising way forward toward individualized medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;69(3):89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ritsner M. The handbook of neuropsychiatric biomarkers, endophenotypes and genes: volume I: neuropsychological endophenotypes and biomarkers. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Pillai A, Buckley PF. Reliable biomarkers and predictors of schizophrenia and its treatment. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2012;35(3):645–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xie J, Lee S, Chen X. Nanoparticle-based theranostic agents. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2010;62(11):1064–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Perkovic MN, Erjavec GN, Strac DS, Uzun S, Kozumplik O, Pivac N. Theranostic biomarkers for schizophrenia. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(4) pii: E733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Light GA, Swerdlow NR. Future clinical uses of neurophysiological biomarkers to predict and monitor treatment response for schizophrenia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015;1344:105–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carbon M, Correll CU. Clinical predictors of therapeutic response to antipsychotics in schizophrenia. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2014;16(4):505–24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Diaz-Caneja CM, Pina-Camacho L, Rodriguez-Quiroga A, Fraguas D, Parellada M, Arango C. Predictors of outcome in early-onset psychosis: a systematic review. NPJ Schizophr. 2015;1:14005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stober G, Ben-Shachar D, Cardon M, Falkai P, Fonteh AN, Gawlik M, et al. Schizophrenia: from the brain to peripheral markers. A consensus paper of the WFSBP task force on biological markers. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2009;10(2):127–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dazzan P, Arango C, Fleischacker W, Galderisi S, Glenthoj B, Leucht S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and the prediction of outcome in first-episode schizophrenia: a review of current evidence and directions for future research. Schizophr Bull. 2015;41(3):574–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thermenos HW, Goldstein JM, Buka SL, Poldrack RA, Koch JK, Tsuang MT, et al. The effect of working memory performance on functional MRI in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2005;74(2–3):179–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nuechterlein KH, Green MF, Kern RS, Baade LE, Barch DM, Cohen JD, et al. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(2):203–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thibaut F, Boutros NN, Jarema M, Oranje B, Hasan A, Daskalakis ZJ, et al. Consensus paper of the WFSBP Task Force on Biological Markers: criteria for biomarkers and endophenotypes of schizophrenia part I: neurophysiology. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2015;16(5):280–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Figurov A, Pozzo-Miller LD, Olafsson P, Wang T, Lu B. Regulation of synaptic responses to high-frequency stimulation and LTP by neurotrophins in the hippocampus. Nature. 1996;381(6584):706–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Libman-Sokolowska M, Drozdowicz E, Nasierowski T. BDNF as a biomarker in the course and treatment of schizophrenia. Psychiatr Pol. 2015;49(6):1149–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pickard BS. Schizophrenia biomarkers: translating the descriptive into the diagnostic. J Psychopharmacol. 2015;29(2):138–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamamori H, Hashimoto R, Fujita Y, Numata S, Yasuda Y, Fujimoto M, et al. Changes in plasma D-serine, L-serine, and glycine levels in treatment-resistant schizophrenia before and after clozapine treatment. Neurosci Lett. 2014;582:93–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ohnuma T, Sakai Y, Maeshima H, Hatano T, Hanzawa R, Abe S, et al. Changes in plasma glycine, L-serine, and D-serine levels in patients with schizophrenia as their clinical symptoms improve: results from the Juntendo University Schizophrenia Projects (JUSP). Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2008;32(8):1905–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sekar A, Bialas AR, de Rivera H, Davis A, Hammond TR, Kamitaki N, et al. Schizophrenia risk from complex variation of complement component 4. Nature. 2016;530(7589):177–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sommer IE, de Witte L, Begemann M, Kahn RS. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in schizophrenia: ready for practice or a good start? J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73(4):414–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Akiibinu MO, Ogundahunsi OA, Ogunyemi EO. Inter-relationship of plasma markers of oxidative stress and thyroid hormones in schizophrenics. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Scarr E, Millan MJ, Bahn S, Bertolino A, Turck CW, Kapur S, et al. Biomarkers for psychiatry: the journey from fantasy to fact, a report of the 2013 CINP Think Tank. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;18(10):pyv042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Prata D, Mechelli A, Kapur S. Clinically meaningful biomarkers for psychosis: a systematic and quantitative review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;45:134–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Department of Science and Technology (Government of India) Research Grant (DST/SJF/LSA-02/2014-15) to GV.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dinakaran, D., Sreeraj, V.S., Venkatasubramanian, G. (2020). Biological Markers for Outcome and Recovery in Schizophrenia. In: Shrivastava, A., De Sousa, A. (eds) Schizophrenia Treatment Outcomes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19847-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics