Advertisement

Spatial-Semiotic Analysis of an Eighth Grade Student’s Use of 3D Modelling Software

  • Candas Uygan
  • Melih TurgutEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Mathematics Education in the Digital Era book series (MEDE, volume 13)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyse the emergence of spatial-semiotic resources attached to an eighth-grade student’s use of 3D modelling software while solving certain spatial tasks. The data come from a task-based interview and is analysed within a spatial-semiotic lens, including different kinds of resources, not only based on the discourse but also based on extra-linguistic expressions such as sketches and gestures. The results of the study show that generally the student’s reasoning steps explore a viewpoint for adding or removing cubes by use of the ‘orbit’ and ‘select’ tools, using ready-made mental images derived from completed steps, linking 2D and 3D representations through spatial visualisation and spatial orientation, and the emergence of spatial vocabulary including strategies and generalizations.

Keywords

Spatial thinking Spatial-semiotic lens 3D modelling software Multimodal paradigm 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) for their financial support during M.Sc. and Ph.D. studies. Special thanks go to the anonymous reviewers and Editors for their careful readings of the paper and making constructive suggestions that improved the presentation of the paper.

References

  1. Alibali, M. W., Boncoddo, R., & Hostetter, A. B. (2014). Gesture in reasoning: An embodied perspective. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 150–159). NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Arzarello, F. (2006). Semiosis as a multimodal process (pp. 267–299). Especial: RELIME.Google Scholar
  3. Arzarello, F. (2008). Mathematical landscapes and their inhabitants: Perceptions, languages, theories. In E. Emborg & M. Niss (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Mathematical Education (pp. 158–181). Copenhagen: ICMI.Google Scholar
  4. Arzarello, F., Paola, D., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2009). Gestures as semiotic resources in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arzarello, F., & Robutti, O. (2008). Framing the embodied mind approach within a multimodal paradigm. In L. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 720–749). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 746–783). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Bishop, A. (1983). Spatial abilities and mathematics thinking. In M. Zweng, T. Green, J. Kilpatrick, H. Pollak, & M. Suydam (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 176–178). Boston: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burin, D. I., Delgado, A. R., & Prieto, G. (2000). Solution strategies and gender differences in spatial visualizations tasks. Psicológica, 21, 275–286.Google Scholar
  10. Dreyfus, T. (1995). Imagery for diagrams. In R. Sutherland & J. Mason (Eds.), Exploiting mental imagery with computers in mathematics education (Vol. 138, pp. 3–19). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 103–131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards, L. D., Ferrara, F., & Moore-Russo, D. (Eds.). (2014). Emerging perspectives on gesture and embodiment in mathematics. NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Godino, J. D., Font, V., Wilhelmi, M. R., & Lurduy, O. (2011). Why is the learning of elementary arithmetic concepts difficult? Semiotic tools for understanding the nature of mathematical objects. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2), 247–265.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9278-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gutiérrez, A. (1996). Visualization in 3-dimensional geometry: In search of a framework. In L. Puig & A. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 3–19). Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.Google Scholar
  15. Janssen, A. B., & Geiser, C. (2010). On the relationship between solution strategies in two mental rotation tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 473–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. La Ferla, V., Olkun, S., Akkurt, Z., Alibeyoglu, M. C., Gonulates, F. O., & Accascina, G. (2009). An international comparison of the effect of using computer manipulatives on middle grades students’ understanding of three-dimensional buildings. In C. Bardini, D. Vagost, & A. Oldknow (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching—ICTMT9. France: University of Metz.Google Scholar
  17. Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics come from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. Y. (2013). A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the Purdue spatial visualization tests: Visualization of rotations (PSVT:R). Educational Psychology Review, 25, 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maffia, A., & Sabena, C. (2015). Networking of theories as resource for classroom activities analysis: The emergence of multimodal semiotic chains. Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica (Mathematics), 25(2), 419–431.Google Scholar
  20. McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86(5), 889–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murdock, K. L. (2009). Google SketchUp and SketchUp Pro 7 Bible. Indianapolis, USA: Wiley Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Virginia: NCTM.Google Scholar
  23. Nemirovsky, R. (2003). Three conjectures concerning the relationship between body activity and understanding mathematics. In N. A. Pateman, B. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 105–109). Honolulu, Hawaii: PME.Google Scholar
  24. Núñez, R. E., Edwards, L. D., & Filipe Matos, J. (1999). Embodied cognition as grounding for situatedness and context in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1), 45–65.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1003759711966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Presmeg, N. C. (1986). Visualization in high school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(3), 42–46.Google Scholar
  26. Presmeg, N. C. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education, past, present and future (pp. 205–235). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Presmeg, N. C., Radford, L., Roth, W.-M., & Kadunz, G. (2016). Semiotics in mathematics education. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sáenz-Ludlow, A., & Kadunz, G. (Eds.). (2016). Semiotics as a tool for learning mathematics. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Sutherland, R. (1995). Mediating mathematical action. In R. Sutherland & J. Mason (Eds.), Exploiting mental imagery with computers in mathematics education (pp. 71–81). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Turgut, M. (2017). A spatial-semiotic framework in the context of information and communication technologies (ICTs). In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Visual-spatial ability in STEM education: Transforming research into practice (pp. 173–194). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Turgut, M., & Uygan, C. (2015). Designing spatial visualization tasks for middle school students with 3D modelling software: An instrumental approach. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 22(2), 45–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationEskisehir Osmangazi UniversityEskisehirTurkey

Personalised recommendations