Abstract
The aim of this paper is to analyse the emergence of spatial-semiotic resources attached to an eighth-grade student’s use of 3D modelling software while solving certain spatial tasks. The data come from a task-based interview and is analysed within a spatial-semiotic lens, including different kinds of resources, not only based on the discourse but also based on extra-linguistic expressions such as sketches and gestures. The results of the study show that generally the student’s reasoning steps explore a viewpoint for adding or removing cubes by use of the ‘orbit’ and ‘select’ tools, using ready-made mental images derived from completed steps, linking 2D and 3D representations through spatial visualisation and spatial orientation, and the emergence of spatial vocabulary including strategies and generalizations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alibali, M. W., Boncoddo, R., & Hostetter, A. B. (2014). Gesture in reasoning: An embodied perspective. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 150–159). NY: Routledge.
Arzarello, F. (2006). Semiosis as a multimodal process (pp. 267–299). Especial: RELIME.
Arzarello, F. (2008). Mathematical landscapes and their inhabitants: Perceptions, languages, theories. In E. Emborg & M. Niss (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Mathematical Education (pp. 158–181). Copenhagen: ICMI.
Arzarello, F., Paola, D., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2009). Gestures as semiotic resources in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics,70(2), 97–109.
Arzarello, F., & Robutti, O. (2008). Framing the embodied mind approach within a multimodal paradigm. In L. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 720–749). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 746–783). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bishop, A. (1983). Spatial abilities and mathematics thinking. In M. Zweng, T. Green, J. Kilpatrick, H. Pollak, & M. Suydam (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 176–178). Boston: Birkhäuser.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology,3, 77–101.
Burin, D. I., Delgado, A. R., & Prieto, G. (2000). Solution strategies and gender differences in spatial visualizations tasks. Psicológica,21, 275–286.
Dreyfus, T. (1995). Imagery for diagrams. In R. Sutherland & J. Mason (Eds.), Exploiting mental imagery with computers in mathematics education (Vol. 138, pp. 3–19). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics,61(1–2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z.
Edwards, L. D., Ferrara, F., & Moore-Russo, D. (Eds.). (2014). Emerging perspectives on gesture and embodiment in mathematics. NC: Information Age Publishing.
Godino, J. D., Font, V., Wilhelmi, M. R., & Lurduy, O. (2011). Why is the learning of elementary arithmetic concepts difficult? Semiotic tools for understanding the nature of mathematical objects. Educational Studies in Mathematics,77(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9278-x.
Gutiérrez, A. (1996). Visualization in 3-dimensional geometry: In search of a framework. In L. Puig & A. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 3–19). Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.
Janssen, A. B., & Geiser, C. (2010). On the relationship between solution strategies in two mental rotation tasks. Learning and Individual Differences,20, 473–478.
La Ferla, V., Olkun, S., Akkurt, Z., Alibeyoglu, M. C., Gonulates, F. O., & Accascina, G. (2009). An international comparison of the effect of using computer manipulatives on middle grades students’ understanding of three-dimensional buildings. In C. Bardini, D. Vagost, & A. Oldknow (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching—ICTMT9. France: University of Metz.
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics come from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. Y. (2013). A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the Purdue spatial visualization tests: Visualization of rotations (PSVT:R). Educational Psychology Review,25, 69–94.
Maffia, A., & Sabena, C. (2015). Networking of theories as resource for classroom activities analysis: The emergence of multimodal semiotic chains. Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica (Mathematics),25(2), 419–431.
McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin,86(5), 889–918.
Murdock, K. L. (2009). Google SketchUp and SketchUp Pro 7 Bible. Indianapolis, USA: Wiley Publishing Inc.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Virginia: NCTM.
Nemirovsky, R. (2003). Three conjectures concerning the relationship between body activity and understanding mathematics. In N. A. Pateman, B. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 105–109). Honolulu, Hawaii: PME.
Núñez, R. E., Edwards, L. D., & Filipe Matos, J. (1999). Embodied cognition as grounding for situatedness and context in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics,39(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1003759711966.
Presmeg, N. C. (1986). Visualization in high school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics,6(3), 42–46.
Presmeg, N. C. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education, past, present and future (pp. 205–235). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Presmeg, N. C., Radford, L., Roth, W.-M., & Kadunz, G. (2016). Semiotics in mathematics education. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Sáenz-Ludlow, A., & Kadunz, G. (Eds.). (2016). Semiotics as a tool for learning mathematics. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Sutherland, R. (1995). Mediating mathematical action. In R. Sutherland & J. Mason (Eds.), Exploiting mental imagery with computers in mathematics education (pp. 71–81). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Turgut, M. (2017). A spatial-semiotic framework in the context of information and communication technologies (ICTs). In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Visual-spatial ability in STEM education: Transforming research into practice (pp. 173–194). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Turgut, M., & Uygan, C. (2015). Designing spatial visualization tasks for middle school students with 3D modelling software: An instrumental approach. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education,22(2), 45–52.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) for their financial support during M.Sc. and Ph.D. studies. Special thanks go to the anonymous reviewers and Editors for their careful readings of the paper and making constructive suggestions that improved the presentation of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uygan, C., Turgut, M. (2019). Spatial-Semiotic Analysis of an Eighth Grade Student’s Use of 3D Modelling Software. In: Aldon, G., Trgalová, J. (eds) Technology in Mathematics Teaching. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19741-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19741-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19740-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19741-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)