Skip to main content

Spatial-Semiotic Analysis of an Eighth Grade Student’s Use of 3D Modelling Software

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technology in Mathematics Teaching

Part of the book series: Mathematics Education in the Digital Era ((MEDE,volume 13))

  • 1029 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyse the emergence of spatial-semiotic resources attached to an eighth-grade student’s use of 3D modelling software while solving certain spatial tasks. The data come from a task-based interview and is analysed within a spatial-semiotic lens, including different kinds of resources, not only based on the discourse but also based on extra-linguistic expressions such as sketches and gestures. The results of the study show that generally the student’s reasoning steps explore a viewpoint for adding or removing cubes by use of the ‘orbit’ and ‘select’ tools, using ready-made mental images derived from completed steps, linking 2D and 3D representations through spatial visualisation and spatial orientation, and the emergence of spatial vocabulary including strategies and generalizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alibali, M. W., Boncoddo, R., & Hostetter, A. B. (2014). Gesture in reasoning: An embodied perspective. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 150–159). NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello, F. (2006). Semiosis as a multimodal process (pp. 267–299). Especial: RELIME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello, F. (2008). Mathematical landscapes and their inhabitants: Perceptions, languages, theories. In E. Emborg & M. Niss (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Mathematical Education (pp. 158–181). Copenhagen: ICMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello, F., Paola, D., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2009). Gestures as semiotic resources in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics,70(2), 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello, F., & Robutti, O. (2008). Framing the embodied mind approach within a multimodal paradigm. In L. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 720–749). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 746–783). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. (1983). Spatial abilities and mathematics thinking. In M. Zweng, T. Green, J. Kilpatrick, H. Pollak, & M. Suydam (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 176–178). Boston: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology,3, 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burin, D. I., Delgado, A. R., & Prieto, G. (2000). Solution strategies and gender differences in spatial visualizations tasks. Psicológica,21, 275–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, T. (1995). Imagery for diagrams. In R. Sutherland & J. Mason (Eds.), Exploiting mental imagery with computers in mathematics education (Vol. 138, pp. 3–19). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics,61(1–2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, L. D., Ferrara, F., & Moore-Russo, D. (Eds.). (2014). Emerging perspectives on gesture and embodiment in mathematics. NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godino, J. D., Font, V., Wilhelmi, M. R., & Lurduy, O. (2011). Why is the learning of elementary arithmetic concepts difficult? Semiotic tools for understanding the nature of mathematical objects. Educational Studies in Mathematics,77(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9278-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, A. (1996). Visualization in 3-dimensional geometry: In search of a framework. In L. Puig & A. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 3–19). Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, A. B., & Geiser, C. (2010). On the relationship between solution strategies in two mental rotation tasks. Learning and Individual Differences,20, 473–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Ferla, V., Olkun, S., Akkurt, Z., Alibeyoglu, M. C., Gonulates, F. O., & Accascina, G. (2009). An international comparison of the effect of using computer manipulatives on middle grades students’ understanding of three-dimensional buildings. In C. Bardini, D. Vagost, & A. Oldknow (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching—ICTMT9. France: University of Metz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics come from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. Y. (2013). A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the Purdue spatial visualization tests: Visualization of rotations (PSVT:R). Educational Psychology Review,25, 69–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maffia, A., & Sabena, C. (2015). Networking of theories as resource for classroom activities analysis: The emergence of multimodal semiotic chains. Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica (Mathematics),25(2), 419–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin,86(5), 889–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, K. L. (2009). Google SketchUp and SketchUp Pro 7 Bible. Indianapolis, USA: Wiley Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Virginia: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemirovsky, R. (2003). Three conjectures concerning the relationship between body activity and understanding mathematics. In N. A. Pateman, B. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 105–109). Honolulu, Hawaii: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Núñez, R. E., Edwards, L. D., & Filipe Matos, J. (1999). Embodied cognition as grounding for situatedness and context in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics,39(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1003759711966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presmeg, N. C. (1986). Visualization in high school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics,6(3), 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presmeg, N. C. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education, past, present and future (pp. 205–235). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presmeg, N. C., Radford, L., Roth, W.-M., & Kadunz, G. (2016). Semiotics in mathematics education. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sáenz-Ludlow, A., & Kadunz, G. (Eds.). (2016). Semiotics as a tool for learning mathematics. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, R. (1995). Mediating mathematical action. In R. Sutherland & J. Mason (Eds.), Exploiting mental imagery with computers in mathematics education (pp. 71–81). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Turgut, M. (2017). A spatial-semiotic framework in the context of information and communication technologies (ICTs). In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Visual-spatial ability in STEM education: Transforming research into practice (pp. 173–194). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Turgut, M., & Uygan, C. (2015). Designing spatial visualization tasks for middle school students with 3D modelling software: An instrumental approach. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education,22(2), 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) for their financial support during M.Sc. and Ph.D. studies. Special thanks go to the anonymous reviewers and Editors for their careful readings of the paper and making constructive suggestions that improved the presentation of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melih Turgut .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Uygan, C., Turgut, M. (2019). Spatial-Semiotic Analysis of an Eighth Grade Student’s Use of 3D Modelling Software. In: Aldon, G., Trgalová, J. (eds) Technology in Mathematics Teaching. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19741-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19741-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19740-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19741-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics