Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Economic Perspectives on Government

Part of the book series: Foundations of Government and Public Administration ((FGPA))

  • 281 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces the economic or public choice approach to studying politics and public administration. It explains the rationality assumptions as predictive devices and how they are applied to types of agent rather than biological ones. It introduces the idea of formal models to provide predictions and how they can be applied to actual social and political processes. It introduces four concepts central to this way of thinking: opportunity costs, incentives, thinking at the margin and voluntary trade. It then introduces the main themes of several schools of public choice and then introduces the themes of the rest of the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aligica, P. D., & Tarko, V. (2013). Co-production, polycentricity, and value heterogeneity: The Ostroms’ public choice institutionalism revisited. American Political Science Review, 107, 726–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D., & Banks, J. S. (1999). Positive political theory, I. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1974a). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1063–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1974b). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. In G. Becker & W. M. Landes (Eds.), Essays in the economics of crime and punishment. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. (2009). Interpersonal comparison of utility. In D. Ross & H. Kincaid (Eds.), Oxford handbook of philosophy of economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, A. E., Greenberg, D. H., Vining, A. R., & Weimer, D. L. (2017). Cost-benefit analysis: Concepts and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1985). The reason of rules: Constitutional political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The limits of liberty: Between anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dowding, K. (2009). What is welfare and how can we measure it? In D. Ross & H. Kincaid (Eds.), Oxford handbook of philosophy of economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowding, K., & Miller, C. (2019). On prediction in political science. European Journal of Political Research (forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12319.

  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, J. S., & Leigh, A. (2009). Born on the first of July: An (un)natural experiment in birth timing. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 246–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iannaccone, L. R. (1998). Introduction to the economics of religion. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 1465–1495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laver, M., & Shepsle, K. A. (1996). Making and breaking governments: Cabinets and legislatures in parliamentary democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R. D. (1979). General conditions for global intransitivities in formal voting models. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47, 1085–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. C. (1990). Interest groups: Economic perspectives and contributions. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2, 85–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2001). Decentralization and development: The new panacea. In K. Dowding, J. Hughes, & H. Margetts (Eds.), Challenges to democracy. Houndmills: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, V. (1987). The political theory of a compound republic: Designing the American experiment (2nd ed.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 19, 211–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. J. (2011). Lone wolf terrorism. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 17. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1623573.

  • Posner, R. A. (2014). Economic analysis of law (9th ed.). New York, NY: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. H. (1982). Liberalism against populism: A confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1978). Instability of simple dynamic games. Review of Economic Studies, 45, 575–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1995). Coalition politics: A formal model and empirical analysis. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 7, 245–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K. A. (1979). Institutional arrangements and equilibrium in multidimensional voting models. American Journal of Political Science, 23, 27–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K. A., & Weingast, B. R. (1987). The institutional foundations of committee power. American Political Science Review, 81, 86–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2, 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies and theft. Western Economic Journal, 5, 224–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1990). The costs of special privilege. In J. E. Alt & K. A. Shepsle (Eds.), Perspectives on positive political economy (pp. 195–211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, D. (1995). The myth of democratic failure: Why political institutions are efficient. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith Dowding .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dowding, K., Taylor, B.R. (2020). Introduction. In: Economic Perspectives on Government. Foundations of Government and Public Administration. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19707-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics