Abstract
Innovation clusters continue to be an important focus of economic development policies in many nations. Leading innovation clusters demonstrate that regional concentration strengthens the innovative capability and can lead to successful competitiveness on a global level, as demonstrated by regions such as Silicon Valley (US), Cambridge (UK) and Sophia Antipolis (France). However the successful creation of clusters still presents a challenge to policy makers as efforts to do so regularly fail. The development of innovation clusters has therefore received much academic and policy maker attention. While past research has examined a variety of factors as drivers for clustering effects, the role of communication within the cluster—and, specifically, the role of key individual communicators—in underpinning successful cluster development has received almost no academic attention. In this chapter, we will draw upon the relevant literature to develop a conceptual framework that will underpin research on this important topic by investigating the role of communicators in innovation clusters. Building on communication theories, the framework suggests that there are four influence-levels that shape and impact the role of communications in innovation clusters: the Individual Level, the Organizational Level, the Cluster Level and the Context. The interdisciplinary view on clustering effects contributes valuable insight to both communication studies and cluster theories. The framework developed within this chapter provides a structure to aid future research on the role of communicators within innovation clusters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Eight professional communicators working in the Cambridge (UK) cluster were interviewed as part of an on-going research project in April–May 2013.
Bibliography
Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. S. (2006). The geography of innovation. In J. Fagerberg, D. C Mowery, & R. R Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baerns, B. (1985). Öffentlichkeitsarbeit oder Journalismus. Zum Einfluß im Mediensystem. Köln: Verlag Wissenschaft und Politik.
Bentele, G., Liebert, T., & Seeling, S. (1997). Von der Determination zur Intereffikation. Ein Integriertes Modell zum Verhältnis von Public Relations und Journalismus. In G. Bentele & M. Haller (Eds.), Aktuelle Entstehung von Öffentlichkeit. Akteure, Strukturen, Veränderungen (pp. 225–250). Konstanz: UVK.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. S. (2001). The social capital of structural holes. In M. F. Guillén, R. Collins, P. England, & M. Meyer (Eds.), New direction in economic sociology (pp. 201–247). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Clark, J. (2013). Tech country report. Retrieved from http://admin.bvca.co.uk/library/documents/Tech_Country.pdf. [13.05.2013].
Dang, R. J., Mortara, L., Thomson, R., & Minshall, T. (2011). Developing a technology intelligence strategy to access knowledge of innovation clusters. In M. HĂĽlsmann & N. Pfeffermann (Eds.), Strategies and communications for innovations. An Integrative Management View for Companies and Networks. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Esser, F. (1998). Die Kräfte hinter den Schlagzeilen. Englischer und deutscher Journalismus im Vergleich. München: Verlag Karl Alber.
European Commision. (2008). Towards world-class clusters in the European Union: Implementing the broad-based innovation strategy. European Commission. SEC (2008) 263.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
Karlsson, C. (2008). Handbook of research on cluster theory. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economic Geography, 99(3), 483–499.
Krugman, P. (1994). Complex landscapes in economic geography. The American Economic Review, 84(2), 412–416.
Lezaric, N., Longhi, C., & Thomas, C. (2008). Gatekeepers of knowledge versus platforms of knowledge: From potential to realized absorptive capacity. Regional Studies, 42(6), 837–852.
Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.
Marshall, A. (1920). Industry and trade. London: Macmillan.
Nordfors, D. (2004a). The role of journalism in innovation systems. Innovation Journalism, 1(7/8), 1–18.
Nordfors, D. (2004b). The concept of innovation journalism. And a program for developing it. Innovation Journalism, 1(1), 1–14.
Nordfors, D., & Ventresca, M. (2006). Innovation journalism: Towards research on the interplay of journalism in innovation ecosystems. Innovation Journalism, 3(2), 1–18.
Nordfors, D., & Uskali, T. (forthcoming). The role of journalism in creating the metaphor of Silicon Valley (pp. 1–20).
Nordfors, D. (2009). Innovation journalism, attention work and the innovation economy. A review of the innovation journalism initiative 2003–2009. Innovation Journalism, 6(1), 1–46.
OECD (2012). Cluster policy and smart specialisation. OECD science, technology and industry outlook 2012. OECD Publishing.
Pfeffermann, N. (2011). Innovation communication as a cross-functional dynamic capability: Strategies for organizations and networks. In M. Hülsmann & N. Pfeffermann (Eds.), Strategies and communications for innovations. An integrative management view for companies and networks (pp. 257–292). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Polany, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 73–93.
Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and the economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 77–90.
Porter, M. (2000). Location, clusters and company strategy. In G. Clark, M. Gertler, & M. Feldman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic geography (pp. 253–274).
PĂĽrer, H. (2003). Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft. Ein Handbuch. Konstanz: UTB.
Preston, P. (2009). Making the news: Journalism and news cultures in Europe. London & New York: Routledge.
Rössler, P. (1997). Agenda Setting. Theoretische Annahmen und Empirische Evidenzen einer Medienwirkungshypothese. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influence on mass media content (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Uyarra, E., & Ramlogan, R. (2012). The effects of cluster policy on innovation. UK National endowment for science, technology and the arts (NESTA). Working Paper 12/05.
Weischenberg, S. (1992). Journalistik. Medienkommunikation. Theorie und Praxis. Opladen: Medienetik, Medieninstitutionen.
Zerfass, A. (2005). Innovation readiness. Innovation Journalism, 2(8), 1–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blasini, B.S., Dang, R.J., Minshall, T., Mortara, L. (2020). The Role of Communicators in Innovation Clusters. In: Pfeffermann, N. (eds) New Leadership in Strategy and Communication. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19681-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19681-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19680-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19681-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)