Advertisement

Introduction

  • Mick BroderickEmail author
  • Katie Ellis
Chapter
  • 81 Downloads

Abstract

To open the book, we introduce critical trauma studies and critical disability studies to argue that it is time these two theoretical approaches entered into a productive conversation. The Mad Max series of films traversing a period of almost 40 years is the ideal text to prompt such a discussion. The character Max Rockatansky transitioned from able-bodied masculinity in the first film to a limping, maddened road warrior in The Road Warrior and, by Fury Road, to a man haunted by guilt and hallucinations, often presenting as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) but rediscovering himself and his humanity. The origins and intentions of both critical trauma and critical disability studies are outlined to examine the sites of divergence and intersection. Focusing on a humanities approach to both trauma and disability, this chapter highlights productive areas of intersection related to aesthetics, metaphor, embodiment and social-cultural critique.

Keywords

Mad Max Critical trauma studies Critical disability studies Aesthetics Embodiment 

References

  1. Ball, K. (2000). Introduction: Trauma and its institutional destinies. Cultural Critique, 46(46), 1–44.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1354407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beilby, P., & Murray, S. (1979). Production report: Mad Max. Cinema Papers, 21, 369.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, J. (2004). Trauma without disability, disability without trauma: A disciplinary divide. JAC, 24(3), 563–582.Google Scholar
  4. Casper, M. J., & Morrison, D. R. (2012). Intersections of disability studies and critical trauma studies: A provocation. Disability Studies Quarterly, 32(2).  https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v32i2.3189
  5. Casper, M. J., & Wertheimer, E. (Eds.). (2016). Critical trauma studies: Understanding violence, conflict and memory in everyday life. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Davidson, M. (2016). Cripping consensus: Disability studies at the intersection. American Literary History, 28(2), 433–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dolmage, J. (2014). Disability rhetoric (1st ed.). Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Donaldson, E. J., & Prendergast, C. (2011). Introduction: Disability and emotion: “There’s no crying in disability studies!”. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 5(2), 129–135.  https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2011.11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Douglas, J. R. (2017). Great directors: George Miler. Senses of Cinema, 83. Retrieved from http://sensesofcinema.com/2017/great-directors/george-miller/#fn-30702-30702
  10. Ellis, K. (2015). Disability and popular culture: Focusing passion, creating community and expressing defiance. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  11. Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kafer, A. (2016). Un/safe disclosures: Scenes of disability and trauma. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 10(1), 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2016.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Longmore, P. (1987). Screening stereotypes: Images of disabled people in television and motion pictures. In A. Gartner & T. Joe (Eds.), Images of the disabled, disabling images (pp. 65–78). New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
  14. Mathews, S. (1984). 35mm dreams. Ringwood, Vic: Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. McCarthy-Jones, S., & Longden, E. (2015). Auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia and post-traumatic stress disorder: Common phenomenology, common cause, common interventions? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1071.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Norden, M. (1994). The cinema of isolation: A history of physical disability in the movies. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Peary, D. (1984). Directing Mad Max and the Road Warrior: An interview with George Miller. In D. Peary (Ed.), OMNI’s screen flights/screen fantasies (pp. 279–286). New York, NY: Dolphin.Google Scholar
  18. Siebers, T. (2008). Disability theory. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Siebers, T. (2010). Disability aesthetics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Steel, C. (2015). Hallucinations as a trauma-based memory: Implications for psychological interventions. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1262.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stout, A., & Schwartz, A. (2014). It’ll grow organically and naturally: The reciprocal relationship between student groups and disability studies on college campuses. Disability Studies Quarterly, 34(2).  https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v34i2
  22. Torrell, M. R. (2016). Interactions: Disability, trauma, and the autobiography. Life Writing, 13(1), 87–103.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14484528.2016.1129572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Waters, F., & Fernyhough, C. (2017). Hallucinations: A systematic review of points of similarity and difference across diagnostic classes. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 43(1), 32–43.  https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbw132CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ArtsMurdoch UniversityMurdochAustralia
  2. 2.School of Media, Creative Arts and Social InquiryCurtin University of TechnologyPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations