Skip to main content

Introduction: The New Science of Welfare and Happiness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Adam Smith’s Pragmatic Liberalism
  • 317 Accesses

Abstract

Adam Smith’s importance as a political thinker has been underestimated, due, in part, to the misplaced perception that his political project lacked coherence and even the belief that he evinced no interest in politics. A key aim of this book is to challenge those perceptions and show that Smith does have a politics but that it has been obscured by his attempts to make the art of governing less ideological, more social-scientific and, most of all, more productive of good effects. Although he showed some interest in conventional political science topics, his main concern was to reconfigure the art of governing according to a new set of methods, values and concerns. It is no use trying to read into the text what we ourselves might expect to discover but to try and allow Smith himself to come through. What he offers is a rich, subtle and original edifice well worth the trouble.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Smith’s appointment as a Commissioner of customs has perplexed many given that the customs service ‘functioned basically as an agent of English mercantilism and as a tax collection agency’ (Anderson et al. 1985: 745). There have been a number of explanations for Smith’s acceptance of this position—which he seems to have actively sought—but the ‘most plausible explanation … is simply that he was tired of scholarly work … he enjoyed his customs work and found it relaxing’ compared to the ardours of research and writing (Anderson et al. 1985: 752).

  2. 2.

    Craig Smith (2013) has addressed the issue of where Smith sits on the left-right spectrum by considering whether he can be associated ‘with the modern egalitarian idea of social justice’. Ryan Hanley suggests that he ‘cuts a useful new path between “right” and “left” on the issue of the legitimate extent of state action’ (Hanley 2014).

  3. 3.

    He is reported to have enjoyed the position and performed his official duties diligently (Anderson et al. 1985: 754).

  4. 4.

    As Joseph Schumpeter wrote in relation to Frank William Taussig, citing Smith as the first of the great economists to think and act this way (Schumpeter 1952: 207).

  5. 5.

    For Smith’s influence in America and on government debates in particular, see Liu (2018) and Fleischacker (2002). According to McLean and Peterson (2010: 95), ‘Adam Smith is not referred to in the records of the U.S. Constitutional Convention of 1787, but he indirectly influenced the substance of the framers’ decisions on several matters, especially the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment’.

  6. 6.

    ‘Freedom of trade in grains moderated domestic prices and maximised production since producers with access to extensive markets would be confident of sales at reasonable prices’ (Tribe 1995: 25–26).

  7. 7.

    Rashid surmises that the ‘freedom of the internal corn-trade may well be considered the first major applied field in which principles of the Wealth of Nations were tested’ (Rashid 1980: 496).

  8. 8.

    Smith defines savage societies as those whose subsistence depends on fishing and hunting.

  9. 9.

    Yet the division labour is not peculiar to commercial nations (WN, i.3: 27–28).

  10. 10.

    This would probably apply to most political ideologies anyway.

References

  • Anderson, G. M., Shughart, W. F., II, & Tollison, R. D. (1985). Adam Smith in the Customhouse. Journal of Political Economy, 93(4), 740–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucoyannis, D. (2013). The Equalizing Hand: Why Adam Smith Thought the Market Should Produce Wealth Without Steep Inequality. Perspectives on Politics, 11(4), 1051–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, V. (1994). Adam Smith’s Discourse. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coats, A. W. B. (Ed.). (1971). The Classical Economists and Economic Policy. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. S. (1989). Justice and Political Economy in Commercial Society: Adam Smith’s “Science of the Legislator”. The Journal of Politics, 51(1), 50–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropsey, J. (1975). Adam Smith and Political Philosophy. In A. S. Skinner & T. Wilson (Eds.), Essays on Adam Smith (pp. 132–153). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endres, A. M. (1995). Adam Smith’s Advisory Style as Illustrated by His Trade Policy Prescriptions. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17(1), 86–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, A. (2002). Moral Supervision and Autonomous Social Order: Wages and Consumption in Eighteenth Century Economic Thought. History of the Human Sciences, 15(1), 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischacker, S. (2002). Adam Smith’s Reception Among the American Founders, 1776–1790. The William and Mary Quarterly, 59(4), 897–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischacker, S. (2004). On Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations: A Philosophical Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman-Barzilai, F. (2010). Adam Smith and the Circles of Sympathy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. M. A. (1968). Adam Smith’s Social Welfare Function. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 15(1), 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haakonssen, L. (1988). Traditions of Liberalism. St. Leonards: Centre for Independent Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halevy, E. (1934). The Growth of Philosophical Radicalism. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, R. P. (2008). Enlightened Nation Building: The Science of the Legislator in Adam Smith and Rousseau. American Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, R. P. (2009). Adam Smith and the Character of Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, R. P. (2014). The “Wisdom of the State”: Adam Smith on China and Tartary. The American Political Science Review, 108(2), 371–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, L. (2016). The Normative Stakes of Economic Growth; or, Why Adam Smith Does Not Rely on “Trickle Down”. The Journal of Politics, 78(1), 50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewins, W. A. S. (1903, June 5). The Fiscal Policy of the Empire. The Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, L. (2012). Adam Smith on Thumos and Irrational Economic Man. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 19(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelfarb, G. (1985). The Idea of Poverty: England in the Early Industrial Age. New York: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hont, I. (2009). Adam Smith’s History of Law and Government as Political Theory. In R. Bourke & R. Geuss (Eds.), Political Judgement: Essays for John Dunn (pp. 131–171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G. (2005). Adam Smith’s Lost Legacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Letwin, W. (1988). Was Adam Smith a Liberal? In K. Haakonssen (Ed.), Traditions of Liberalism (pp. 83–104). St. Leonards: Centre for Independent Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G. M. (2018). The Apostle of Free Trade: Adam Smith and the Nineteenth-Century American Trade Debates. History of European Ideas, 44(2), 210–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandeville, B. (1924). In F. B. Kaye (Ed.), The Fable of the Bees or Private Vices, Publick Benefits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, I. (2006). Adam Smith, Radical and Egalitarian: An Interpretation for the Twenty-First Century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, I., & Peterson, S. M. (2010). Adam Smith at the Constitutional Convention. Loyola Law Review, 56(1), 95–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minowitz, P. (1994). Profits, Priests, and Princes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, J. A. (2012). Before Hegemony: Adam Smith, American Independence and the Origins of the First Era of Globalization. International Organisation, 66(3), 395–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossner, E. C. (1969). Adam Smith: The Biographical Approach. David Murray Lecture, University of Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossner, E. C., & Ross, I. S. (1976). Introduction. In A. Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, D. Raphael & A. L. MacFie, (Eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2000). Duties of Justice, Duties of Material Aid: Cicero’s Problematic Legacy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 8(2), 176–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oz-Salzberger, F. (2003). The Political Theory of the Scottish Enlightenment. In A. Broadie (Ed.), The Scottish Enlightenment (pp. 157–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, N. (2010). Adam Smith: An Enlightened Life. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, S. (1980). The Policy of Laissez-Faire During Scarcities. The Economic Journal, 90, 493–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, D. C. (2016). Adam Smith on What Is Wrong with Economic Inequality. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 342–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. (1997). Introduction, to A. Fletcher, Political Works. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, I. S. (1995). Life of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, E. (1992). Adam Smith and Conservative Economics. Economic History Review, XLV(1), 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, E. (2001). Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet and the Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, J. (2012). Adam Smith on Justice and the Needs of the Poor. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 34(4), 559–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1952). Ten Great Economists: From Marx to Keynes. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2009). The Idea of Justice. London: Belknap.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, B. (2004). Montesquieu, Adam Smith and the Discovery of the Social. Journal of Classical Sociology, 4(1), 31–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1976 [1759]). In D. D. Raphael & A. L. MacFie (Eds.), The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1979 [1776]). In R. H. Campbell & A. S. Skinner (Eds.), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1978). In R. L. Meek, D. D. Raphael, & L. G. Stein (Eds.), Lectures on Jurisprudence (A and B). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1980). In I. S. Ross (Ed.), Essays on Philosophical Subjects. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1987). In E. C. Mossner & I. S. Ross (Eds.), The Correspondence of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (2013). Adam Smith: Left or Right? Political Studies, 61(4), 784–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. (1980 [1793]). Account of the Life and Writings of Adam Smith, LL.D, I.S. Ross (ed.). In W. P. D. Wightman & J. C. Bryce (Eds.), Adam Smith: Essays on Philosophical Subjects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. (1975). Smith’s Travels on the Ship of State. In A. S. Skinner & T. Wilson (Eds.), Essays on Adam Smith (pp. 237–246). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichgraeber, R. F. (1987). ‘Less Abused Than I Had Reason to Expect’: The Reception of the Wealth of Nations in Britain, 1776–90. The Historical Journal, 30(2), 337–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tribe, K. (1995). Natural Liberty and Laissez-Faire: How Adam Smith Became a Free Trade Ideologue. In S. Copley & K. Sutherland (Eds.), Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations: New Interdisciplinary Essays (pp. 23–44). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, E. G. (1976). Adam Smith’s Economics of Politics. History of Political Economy, 8(4), 515–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, D. (1978). Adam Smith’s Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Witzum, A., & Young, J. T. (2006). The Neglected Agent: Justice, Power and Distribution in Adam Smith. History of Political Economy, 38(1), 437–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, S. (1960). Politics and Vision. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Hill .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hill, L. (2020). Introduction: The New Science of Welfare and Happiness. In: Adam Smith’s Pragmatic Liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19337-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics