Advertisement

Content- and Context-Related Trust in Open Multi-agent Systems Using Linked Data

  • Valentin SiegertEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11496)

Abstract

In open multi-agent systems, linked data enables agents to communicate with each other and to gather knowledge for autonomous decision. Until now, trust is a factor for starting communications and ignores doubts about the content or context of ongoing communications. Several approaches are used to identify whom to trust and how human trust can be computationally modeled. Yet, they do not consider a change of context or of other agents’ behavior at runtime. The proposed doctoral work aims to support content- and context-related trust in open multi-agent systems using linked data. Existing trust models need to be surveyed with respect to content- and context-related trust. A framework based on a fitting trust model and working with linked data must be developed to establish and dynamically refine trust relationships on the autonomous agents’ point of view. This would enhance the applicability of decentralized systems without introducing central units as the history of the web demonstrates. Web engineers are hereby supported to work on a new level of abstraction using the decentralization, but not scrutinizing specific communication sequences.

Keywords

Solid Trust Content trust Multi-agent systems Linked data 

References

  1. 1.
    Sambra, A.V., Mansour, E., Hawke, S., et al.: Solid: a platform for decentralized social applications based on linked data (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibáñez, L.-D., Simperl, E., Gandon, F., et al.: Redecentralizing the web with distributed ledgers. IEEE Intell. Syst. 32, 92–95 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Appelquist, D., Brickley, D., Carvahlo, M., et al.: Social Web XG Wiki (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mehra, S.K.: Paradise is a walled garden? In: Trust, Antitrust and User Dynamism, pp. 889–952 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Langer, A., Siegert, V., Göpfert, C., Gaedke, M.: SemQuire - assessing the data quality of linked open data sources based on DQV. In: Pautasso, C., Sánchez-Figueroa, F., Systä, K., Murillo Rodríguez, J.M. (eds.) ICWE 2018. LNCS, vol. 11153, pp. 163–175. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03056-8_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Artz, D., Gil, Y.: A survey of trust in computer science and the semantic web. J. Web Semant. 5, 58–71 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Golbeck, J.: computing with trust: definition, properties, and algorithms. In: 2006 Securecomm and Workshops, pp. 1–7 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marsh, S., Briggs, P.: Examining trust, forgiveness and regret as computational concepts. In: Golbeck, J. (ed.) Computing with Social Trust. Human–Computer Interaction Series, pp. 9–43. Springer, London (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-356-9_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cao, Q.H., Khan, I., Farahbakhsh, R., et al.: A trust model for data sharing in smart cities. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Falcone, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Trust dynamics: how trust is influenced by direct experiences and by trust itself. In: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 740–747. IEEE (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harrison McKnight, D., Chervany, N.L.: Trust and distrust definitions: one bite at a time. In: Falcone, R., Singh, M., Tan, Y.-H. (eds.) Trust in Cyber-societies. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2246, pp. 27–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45547-7_3CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gil, Y., Artz, D.: Towards content trust of web resources. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 5, 227–239 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Drawel, N., Qu, H., Bentahar, J., et al.: Specification and automatic verification of trust-based multi-agent systems. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.01.040
  14. 14.
    Huynh, T.D., Jennings, N.R., Shadbolt, N.R.: FIRE: an integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2004: 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 18–22 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technische Universität ChemnitzChemnitzGermany

Personalised recommendations