Abstract
The following pages explore the traces of a way of thinking of areas and lengths that seems strange to us but which in a number of mathematical cultures was so familiar that there was no need to explain it: so strange and so familiar, indeed, that modern historians have declared passages in the sources that reflect this conceptual structure to be erroneous, confused or meaningless. I refer to the habit to imagine lines as carriers of a virtual breadth equal to one length unit, and areas as composed of such unit strips. This habit was widely spread in many environments of practical mensuration. In these it was easy to agree on using the basic unit of length as standardized breadth: land was, so to speak, measured as cloth is still sold nowadays, with its physically determined breadth. But it is also reflected in texts which are more theoretical in origin though still inspired or coloured by practical mensuration and its language.
Originally published as “Linee larghe: Un’ambiguità geometrica dimenticata” Bollettino di Storia delle Scienze Matematiche 15 (1995)
A few additions to the translation in 〚…〛
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boncompagni, Baldassare (ed.), 1862. Scritti di Leonardo Pisano matematico del secolo decimoterzo. Vol. II. Practica geometriae et Opusculi. Roma: Tipografia delle Scienze Matematiche e Fisiche.
Bury, R. G. (ed., trans.), 1926. Plato, Laws. 2 vols. (Loeb Classical Library). London: Heinemann / New York: Putnam.
Heiberg, J. L. (ed., trans.), 1883. Euclidis Elementa. Vol. I. (Euclidis Opera omnia, vol. I). Leipzig: Teubner.
Heiberg, J. L. (ed., trans.), 1912. Heronis Definitiones cum variis collectionibus. Heronis quae feruntur Geometrica. (Heronis Alexandrini Opera quae supersunt omnia, IV). Leipzig: Teubner.
Heiberg, J. L. (ed., trans.), 1914. Heronis quae feruntur Stereometrica et De mensuris. (Heronis Alexandrini Opera quae supersunt omnia, V). Leipzig: Teubner.
Høyrup, Jens, 1990a. “Algebra and Naive Geometry. An Investigation of Some Basic Aspects of Old Babylonian Mathematical Thought”. Altorientalische Forschungen 17, 27−69, 262−354.
Høyrup, Jens, 1990b. “Dýnamis, the Babylonians, and Theaetetus 147c7—148d7”. Historia Mathematica 17, 201−222.
Høyrup, Jens, 1992. “The Babylonian Cellar Text BM 85200 + VAT 6599. Retranslation and Analysis”. Pp. 315−358 in S. S. Demidov et al (eds), Amphora. Festschrift für Hans Wussing zu seinem 65. Geburtstag. Basel etc.: Birkhäuser.
Høyrup, Jens, forthcoming. “The Four Sides and the Area’. Oblique Light on the Prehistory of Algebra”. Forthcoming in Ronal Calinger (ed.), History of Mathematics: Sources, Studies, and Pedagogic Integration. Washington, D.C.: The Mathematical Association of America. 〚Unfortunately, the paper was published (in 1996) without author’s (and apparently without any) proofreading, and turned out to be marred by numerous catastrophic conversion errors. The argument is much more fully developed in article I.3.〛
Morrow, Glenn R. (ed., trans.), 1970. Proclus, A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Mueller, Ian, 1992. “Mathematics and Education: Some Notes on the Platonic Programme”. Pp. 85–104 in I. Mueller (ed.), Peri Tōn Mathēmatōn. Edmonton, Alberta: Academic Printing and Publishing.
Pacioli, Luca, 1523. Summa de Arithmetica geometria Proportioni: et proportionalita. Novamente impressa. Toscolano: Paganinus de Paganino. [11494].
Parker, Richard A., 1972. Demotic Mathematical Papyri. Providence & London: Brown University Press.
Peet, T. Eric, 1923. The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus, British Museum 10057 and 10058. London: University Press of Liverpool
Tredennick, Hugh, & E. S. Forster (eds, trans.), 1960. Aristotle, Posterior Analytics and Topica. (Loeb Classical Library 391). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press / London: Heinemann.
van der Waerden, B. L., 1962. Science Awakening. 2nd Edition. Groningen: Noordhoff. [11954].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Høyrup, J. (2019). (Article I.7.) Broad Lines – A Forgotten Geometrical Ambiguity. In: Selected Essays on Pre- and Early Modern Mathematical Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19258-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19258-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19257-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19258-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)