Skip to main content

(Article I.7.) Broad Lines – A Forgotten Geometrical Ambiguity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Selected Essays on Pre- and Early Modern Mathematical Practice

Abstract

The following pages explore the traces of a way of thinking of areas and lengths that seems strange to us but which in a number of mathematical cultures was so familiar that there was no need to explain it: so strange and so familiar, indeed, that modern historians have declared passages in the sources that reflect this conceptual structure to be erroneous, confused or meaningless. I refer to the habit to imagine lines as carriers of a virtual breadth equal to one length unit, and areas as composed of such unit strips. This habit was widely spread in many environments of practical mensuration. In these it was easy to agree on using the basic unit of length as standardized breadth: land was, so to speak, measured as cloth is still sold nowadays, with its physically determined breadth. But it is also reflected in texts which are more theoretical in origin though still inspired or coloured by practical mensuration and its language.

Originally published as “Linee larghe: Un’ambiguità geometrica dimenticata” Bollettino di Storia delle Scienze Matematiche 15 (1995)

A few additions to the translation in 〚…〛

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Boncompagni, Baldassare (ed.), 1862. Scritti di Leonardo Pisano matematico del secolo decimoterzo. Vol. II. Practica geometriae et Opusculi. Roma: Tipografia delle Scienze Matematiche e Fisiche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bury, R. G. (ed., trans.), 1926. Plato, Laws. 2 vols. (Loeb Classical Library). London: Heinemann / New York: Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiberg, J. L. (ed., trans.), 1883. Euclidis Elementa. Vol. I. (Euclidis Opera omnia, vol. I). Leipzig: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiberg, J. L. (ed., trans.), 1912. Heronis Definitiones cum variis collectionibus. Heronis quae feruntur Geometrica. (Heronis Alexandrini Opera quae supersunt omnia, IV). Leipzig: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiberg, J. L. (ed., trans.), 1914. Heronis quae feruntur Stereometrica et De mensuris. (Heronis Alexandrini Opera quae supersunt omnia, V). Leipzig: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Høyrup, Jens, 1990a. “Algebra and Naive Geometry. An Investigation of Some Basic Aspects of Old Babylonian Mathematical Thought”. Altorientalische Forschungen 17, 27−69, 262−354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Høyrup, Jens, 1990b. “Dýnamis, the Babylonians, and Theaetetus 147c7—148d7”. Historia Mathematica 17, 201−222.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Høyrup, Jens, 1992. “The Babylonian Cellar Text BM 85200 + VAT 6599. Retranslation and Analysis”. Pp. 315−358 in S. S. Demidov et al (eds), Amphora. Festschrift für Hans Wussing zu seinem 65. Geburtstag. Basel etc.: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Høyrup, Jens, forthcoming. “The Four Sides and the Area’. Oblique Light on the Prehistory of Algebra”. Forthcoming in Ronal Calinger (ed.), History of Mathematics: Sources, Studies, and Pedagogic Integration. Washington, D.C.: The Mathematical Association of America. 〚Unfortunately, the paper was published (in 1996) without author’s (and apparently without any) proofreading, and turned out to be marred by numerous catastrophic conversion errors. The argument is much more fully developed in article I.3.〛

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, Glenn R. (ed., trans.), 1970. Proclus, A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Ian, 1992. “Mathematics and Education: Some Notes on the Platonic Programme”. Pp. 85–104 in I. Mueller (ed.), Peri Tōn Mathēmatōn. Edmonton, Alberta: Academic Printing and Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacioli, Luca, 1523. Summa de Arithmetica geometria Proportioni: et proportionalita. Novamente impressa. Toscolano: Paganinus de Paganino. [11494].

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, Richard A., 1972. Demotic Mathematical Papyri. Providence & London: Brown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet, T. Eric, 1923. The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus, British Museum 10057 and 10058. London: University Press of Liverpool

    Google Scholar 

  • Tredennick, Hugh, & E. S. Forster (eds, trans.), 1960. Aristotle, Posterior Analytics and Topica. (Loeb Classical Library 391). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press / London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Waerden, B. L., 1962. Science Awakening. 2nd Edition. Groningen: Noordhoff. [11954].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens Høyrup .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Høyrup, J. (2019). (Article I.7.) Broad Lines – A Forgotten Geometrical Ambiguity. In: Selected Essays on Pre- and Early Modern Mathematical Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19258-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics