Skip to main content

Reverse Engineering and Straightforward Design as Tools to Improve the Teaching of Mechanical Engineering

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The challenges imposed by today’s societies, which demand products and services of quality and of greater technological complexity, require the formation of highly trained human resources, which confront the various problems that arise in industries. Reverse engineering and the direct design are applied to solve problems in companies and universities. These methods, in combination with active methodologies, provide tools that potentiate the teaching of engineering. This article presents a proposal for the definition of reverse engineering and its application, together with the direct design method, in the development of novel procedures oriented toward the teaching of engineering.

Design/Method/Approach: The procedures are logical sequences of the tasks and activities that are applied to pose or raise problems of mechanics and to make systematic measurements of components, as well as to document the designs of the products. To show the application of active methodologies in learning, the project-based learning (PBL) is used in a case study.

Results/Anticipations: The proposed definition of reverse engineering allowed to generate procedures to support students in the measurement of pieces. In addition, the nine steps of direct design promote order and the systematization in the development of a product and establish the importance of documenting a project as the basis of technology development. In order to potentiate engineering education, it is necessary to incorporate active learning methods, such as the PBL.

Conclusions: Reverse engineering and the direct design method are two methods that assist engineering education. The procedures described in this paper, together with the PBL, promote the formation of generic and specific competences, as well as the order, systematization, and normalization in projects that implies measurements and component design, to the benefit of engineering education and of the industrial sector.

Keywords

  • Reverse engineering, Engineering education, Metrology

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-19139-9_7
  • Chapter length: 26 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-19139-9
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 7.1
Fig. 7.2
Fig. 7.3
Fig. 7.4
Fig. 7.5
Fig. 7.6
Fig. 7.7
Fig. 7.8
Fig. 7.9
Fig. 7.10

References

  • Ali, S., Durupt, A., & Adragna, A. (2013). Reverse engineering for manufacturing approach: Based on the combination of 3D and knowledge information. In M. Abramovici & R. Stark (Eds.), Smart product engineering, LNPE (pp. 137–146). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. (2018). Competency-based education: Recent policy trends. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 3(1), 1–5.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Barrio, R., Blanco, E., Martínez, J., & Galdo, M. (2010). Learning oriented to fluid mechanics projects through experimentation with water rockets. Net-U. Journal of University Teaching, (2). Recovered on March 18, 2012 from http://www.um.es/ead/Red_U/?/

  • Beamud, E., Nuñez, P., García, E., & García, J. (2017). Reverse engineering applied to the teaching of computer aided manufacturing. Materials Science Forum, 903, 120–127.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay, S. (2017). Material and processing basics through reverse engineering. In 2017 ASEE annual conference & exposition, June 25–28. Columbus: American Society for Engineering Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conwell, J., Catalano, G., & Beard, J. (1993). A case study in creative problem solving in engineering design. Journal of Engineering Education, 82(1), 227–231.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, S., Harston, S., & Mattson, C. (2011). The fundamentals of barriers to reverse engineering and their implementation into mechanical components. Research in Engineering Design, 22, 245–261.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Eggert, R. (2005). Engineering design. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilam, E. (2005). Reversing: Secrets of reverse engineering. Indianapolis: Wiley Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farhana, N., Tasir, Z., Abd, N., & Mohamad, Z. (2017). Project-based learning from constructivism point of view. Advanced Science Letters, 23(8), 7904–7906.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, A. (2005). Nuevas metodologías docentes. Recuperado el 12 de marzo de 2013 de http://tecnologiaedu.us.es/mec2011/htm/mas/4/41/64.pdf

  • Henri, M., Johnson, M., & Nepal, B. (2017). A review of competency-based learning: Tools, assessments, and recommendations. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 607–638.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo, E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, E., García, L., Longorio, R., Luna, A., Luna, G., Martínez, V., Delfín, J., & Ontiveros, S. (2012). Development procedures for the systematic measurement of parts and components, from an analytical programs of reverse engineering perspective. In XII international conference on engineering and technology education (pp. 37–41), March 11–14. Dili.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, E., Luna, G., Uzeta, C., García, L., Ontiveros, S., Martínez, V., Lucero, B., & Pérez, P. (2013a). Forward design process and reverse engineering considerations. In W. Aung et al. (Eds.), iNEER special volume: Innovations 2013 – world innovations in engineering education and research (pp. 197–207). Potomac: iNEER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, E., Martínez, V., Reyes, L., Ontiveros, S., García, L., Luna, G., Vela, L., & Delfín, J. (2013b). Process design systematization for specific applications: Engineering education contribution. Journal of Modern Education Review, 3(5), 416–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, E., García, L., Delfín, J., Lucero, B., & Martínez, V. (2016). Trayectoria de las mediciones de la ingeniería inversa de partes y componentes. Simposio de Metrología. CENAM. 19 al 23 de septiembre. Qro, Querétaro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Report from the Committee on K-12 Education for the National Academies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labrador, J., & Andreu, M. (2008). Metodologías Activas. Valencia: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna, G., Jiménez, E., García, L., Ontiveros, S., Reyes, L., Martínez, V., Delfín, J., & Lucero, B. (2011). Importance of research procedure in reverse engineering for engineering education. In W. Aung et al. (Eds.), Innovations 2011: World innovations in engineering education and research (pp. 379–390). Potomac: iNNER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysne, O. (2018). The Huawei and Snowden question, SimulaSpringerBriefs on computing. Cham: Springer Open.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. J. (1993). A computational view of design creativity. In J. S. Gero & M. L. Maher (Eds.), Modeling creativity and knowledge-based creative design (pp. 25–42). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monat, J., & Gannon, T. (2018). Two professors experience with competence-based education. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 3(2), 1–15.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, L., Jiménez, E., Bojórquez, I., & Ramírez, G. (2013). Competencies and teaching strategies: Experiences at the La Salle University Norwest. Ecorfan. Valley of Santiago. (1 ed.), Handbook.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, S., & Abulencia, P. (2010). Learning through reverse engineering. In American Society for Engineering Education annual conference and exposition 2010, 20–23 June. Louisville: American Society for Engineering Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (2007). Engineering design: A systematic approach. London: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Raja, V. (2008). Introduction to reverse engineering. In V. Raja & K. J. Fernandes (Eds.), Reverse Engineering an industrial perspective (pp. 1–9). London: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sokól, K., & Cekus, D. (2017). Reverse engineering as a solution in parts restoration process. Procedia Engineering, 177, 210–217.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sreeram, R., Hussian, M., & Rao, S. (2016). Latest research on reverse engineering technology: Review. In Proceedings of the international conference on paradigms in engineering & technology (ICPET2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tembe, B. L., & Kamble, S. K. (2016). Implementation of active learning methods in mechanical engineering education to enhance students’ performance. In 2016 IEEE 40th annual computer software and applications conference (COMPSAC). Atlanta. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2016.12

  • Tobón. (2008). Competency-based training in higher education: The complex approach. Retrieved on March 13, 2013 from http://www.conalepfresnillo.com/images/stories/conalep/Formaci%C3%B3n%20basada%20en%20competencias.%20Sergio%20Tob%C3%B3n.pdf

  • Ullman, D. (2003). The mechanical design process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner, I., & Betzer, N. (2001). Machine control – a design and technology discipline in Israel’s senior high schools. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(3), 263–272.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Verner, I., & Greenholts, M. (2017). Teacher education to analyze and design systems through reverse engineering. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 560, 122–132.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, T. (2016). STEM from the perspectives of engineering design and suggested tools and learning design. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 2(1), 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors of this work thank the La Salle University Northwest, the Technological University of the South of Sonora, the Sonora State University, the Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, and the Higher Technological Institute of Cajeme, for the facilities and support that led to the realization of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eusebio Jiménez López .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

López, E.J., Flores, M.A., Sandoval, G.L., Velázquez, B.L., Vázquez, J.J.D., Velásquez, L.A.G. (2019). Reverse Engineering and Straightforward Design as Tools to Improve the Teaching of Mechanical Engineering. In: Abdulwahed, M., Bouras, A., Veillard, L. (eds) Industry Integrated Engineering and Computing Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19139-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19139-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19138-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19139-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)