Abstract
The paper examines two concepts that have been frequently used in Information and Communications Technologies for Development (ICT4D) research, capabilities and affordance. We seek to delineate their similarities, their differences, and their accurate application in ICT4D. Both concepts connote a space of opportunities, both are relational between artefact and human agency when applied in ICT4D, and both entail potential rather than actualisation of possibilities. By comparing the two at some length, we hope to generate a more refined understanding of both capabilities and affordance, as well as how they could be more accurately applied in ICT4D.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bernhard, E., Recker, J.C., Burton-Jones, A.: Understanding the actualisation of affordances: a study in the process modeling context (2013)
Bloomfield, B.P., Latham, Y., Vurdubakis, T.: Bodies, technologies and action possibilities: When is an affordance? Sociology 44(3), 415–433 (2010)
Faith, B.: Gender, mobile, and mobile internet| maintenance affordances, capabilities and structural inequalities: mobile phone use by low-income women. Inf. Technol. Int. Dev. 14, 66–80 (2018)
Faraj, S., Azad, B.: The materiality of technology: an affordance perspective. In: Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, pp. 237–258 (2012)
Gibson, J.: The theory of affordances. In: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, pp. 127–143. Houghton Miffin, Boston (1979)
Gros, B., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Future trends in the design strategies and technological affordances of e-learning. In: Spector, M., Lockee, B.B., Childress, M.D. (eds.) Learning, Design, and Technology, pp. 1–23. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_67-1
Hatakka, M., Thapa, D., Sæbø, Ø.: A framework for understanding the link between ICT and development: how affordances influence capabilities. In: SIG GlobDev, Dublin, 11 December 2016 (2016)
Hausvik, G.I., Thapa, D.: “What you see is not what you get”-challenges in actualisation of EHR affordances. In: Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, Seoul, South Korea (2017)
Kleine, D.: ICT4WHAT?—using the choice framework to operationalise the capability approach to development. J. Int. Dev. 22(5), 674–692 (2010)
Lanamäki, A., Thapa, D., Stendal, K.: When is an affordance? outlining four stances. In: Introna, L., Kavanagh, D., Kelly, S., Orlikowski, W., Scott, S. (eds.) Beyond Interpretivism? New Encounters with Technology and Organization. IS&O 2016. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 489, pp. 125–139. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49733-4_8
Lawson, C.: Technology and the extension of human capabilities. J. Theor. Soc. Behav. 40(2), 207–223 (2010)
Leonardi, P.M., Barley, S.R.: What’s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Acad. Manage. Ann. 4(1), 1–51 (2010)
Majchrzak, A., Markus, M.L.: Technology affordances and constraints theory of management information systems. In: Kessler, E.H. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Management Theory, pp. 832–836. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2013)
Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G.C., Azad, B.: The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 19(1), 38–55 (2013)
Mansour, O., Askenas, L., Ghazawneh, A.: Social media and organizing – an empirical analysis of the role of wiki affordances in organizing practices. In: Proceedings of International Conference of Information Systems 2013, Milan, Italy (2013)
Markus, M.L., Silver, M.S.: A foundation for the study of IT effects: a new look at DeSanctis and Poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 9(10/11), 609 (2008)
Oosterlaken, I.: Inserting technology in the relational ontology of Sen’s capability approach. J. Hum. Dev. Capabilities 12(3), 425–432 (2011)
Robey, D., Anderson, C., Raymond, B.: Information technology, materiality, and organizational change: a professional Odyssey. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 14(7), 379 (2013)
Robeyns, I.: The capability approach: a theoretical survey. J. Hum. Dev. 6(1), 93–114 (2005)
Seidel, S., Recker, J.C., Vom Brocke, J.: Sensemaking and sustainable practicing: functional affordances of information systems in green transformations. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 37(4), 1275–1299 (2013)
Sein, M.K., Thapa, D., Hatakka, M., Sæbø, Ø.: A holistic perspective on the theoretical foundations for ICT4D research. In: Information Technology for Development, pp. 1–19 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2018.1503589
Sen, A.: Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)
Sen, A.: Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press, New York (2000)
Smith, M.L., Seward, C.: The relational ontology of Amartya Sen’s capability approach: incorporating social and individual causes. J. Hum. Dev. Capabilities 10(2), 213–235 (2009)
Thapa, D., Hatakka, M.: Understanding ICT in ICT4D: an affordance perspective. In: Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017)
Thapa, D., Sæbø, Ø.: Exploring the link between ICT and development in the context of developing countries: a literature review. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Countries 64, 1–15 (2014)
Thapa, D., Sein, M.K.: Trajectory of affordances: insights from a case of telemedicine in Nepal. Inf. Syst. J. 28(5), 796–817 (2018)
Thapa, D., Sein, M.K., Sæbø, Ø.: Building collective capabilities through ICT in a mountain region of Nepal: where social capital leads to collective action. Inf. Technol. Dev. 18(1), 5–22 (2012)
Treem, J.W., Leonardi, P.M.: Social media use in organizations: exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 36(1), 143–189 (2013)
Volkoff, O., Strong, D.M.: Critical realism and affordances: theorizing IT-associated organizational change processes. MIS Q. 37(3), 819–834 (2013)
Walsham, G.: Are we making a better world with ICTs? Reflections on a future agenda for the IS field. J. Inf. Technol. 27(2), 87–93 (2012)
Walsham, G.: ICT4D research: reflections on history and future agenda. Inf. Technol. Dev. 23(1), 18–41 (2017)
Zheng, Y.: Different spaces for e-development: What can we learn from the capability approach? Inf. Technol. Dev. 15(2), 66–82 (2009)
Zheng, Y., Stahl, B.C.: Technology, capabilities and critical perspectives: what can critical theory contribute to Sen’s capability approach? Ethics Inf. Technol. 13(2), 69–80 (2011)
Zheng, Y., Walsham, G.: Inequality of what Social exclusion in the e-society as capability deprivation. Inf. Technol. People 21(3), 222–243 (2008)
Zheng, Y., Yu, A.: Affordances of social media in collective action: the case of free lunch for children in China. Inf. Syst. J. 26(3), 289–313 (2016)
Zheng, Y., Hatakka, M., Sahay, S., Andersson, A.: Conceptualizing development in information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Inf. Technol. Dev. 24(1), 1–14 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Thapa, D., Zheng, Y. (2019). Capabilities and Affordances in the ICT4D Context. In: Nielsen, P., Kimaro, H. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies for Development. Strengthening Southern-Driven Cooperation as a Catalyst for ICT4D. ICT4D 2019. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 552. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19115-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19115-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19114-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19115-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)