Managerial Incentives and Polluting Inputs Under Imperfect Competition

  • Denis ClaudeEmail author
  • Mabel Tidball
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 280)


This paper explores the link between upstream input pricing and downstream strategic delegation decisions. It complements earlier contributions by studying how environmental emissions and tax payments alter the incentives business owners have to divert their managers from profit maximization in favor of sales revenue generation. Two scenarios are compared depending on whether the upstream supplier precommits to a fixed input price or adopts a flexible price strategy. Corresponding Subgame-Perfect Nash-Equilibria are characterized and elements of comparative statics analysis are presented. The analysis confirms that previous results—showing that a price precommitment makes the upstream supplier better off and downstream firms worse off—carry over to situations in which production generates pollution.


Precommitment Externality Delegation Vertical relations Managerial incentives 



We would like to thanks the two anonymous referees for their useful comments and suggestions. This work was supported by the ANR GREEN-Econ research project (ANR-16-CE03-0005).


  1. Barcena-Ruiz, J. C., & Garzon, M. B. (2002). Environmental taxes and strategic delegation. Spanish Economic Review, 4(4), 301–310.Google Scholar
  2. Bergstrom, T. C., & Varian, H. R. (1985a). Two remarks on Cournot equilibria. Economics Letters, 19(1), 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergstrom, T. C., & Varian, H. R. (1985b). When are Nash equilibria independent of the distribution of agents’ characteristics? The Review of Economic Studies, 52(4), 715–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breton, M., Haurie, A., & Georges, Z. (1990). Methods in the analysis of multistage commodity markets. In C. T. Leondes (Ed.), Advances in large scale systems dynamics and control: Vol. 36. Control and dynamic systems (pp. 75–105). Cambridge: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Claude, D. (2018). A reconsideration of the link between vertical externality and managerial incentives. Managerial and Decision Economics, 39(5), 526–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Claude, D., & Zaccour, G. (2009). Investment in tourism market and reputation. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 11(5), 797–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fershtman, C., & Judd, K. L. (1987). Equilibrium incentives in oligopoly. The American Economic Review, 77(5), 927–940.Google Scholar
  9. Fumas, V. S. (1992). Relative performance evaluation of management. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10(3), 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jorgensen, S., & Zaccour, G. (2004). Models of marketing channels. In Differential games in marketing. International series in quantitative marketing (Vol. 15). Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Kopel, M., & Pezzino, M. (2018). Strategic delegation in oligopoly (Chap. 24). In L. Corchon & M. Marini (Eds.), Handbook of game theory and industrial organization. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  12. Lambertini, L. (2017). An economic theory of managerial firms: Strategic delegation in oligopoly. Routledge studies in the economics of business and industry. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liao, P.-C. (2008). Input price contracts and strategic delegation with downstream duopoly. Academia Economic Papers, 36(4), 387–404.Google Scholar
  14. Liao, P.-C. (2010). Discriminatory input pricing and strategic delegation. Managerial and Decision Economics, 31(4), 263–276.Google Scholar
  15. Miller, N., & Pazgal, A. (2002). Relative performance as a strategic commitment mechanism. Managerial and Decision Economics, 23(2), 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ngendakuriyo, F., & Zaccour, G. (2013). Fighting corruption: To precommit or not? Economics Letters, 120(2), 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pal, R. (2012). Delegation and emission tax in a differentiated oligopoly. The Manchester School, 80(6), 650–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Park, E.-S. (2002). Vertical externality and strategic delegation. Managerial and Decision Economics, 23(3), 137–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sengul, M., Gimeno, J., & Dial, J. (2012). Strategic delegation a review, theoretical integration, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(1), 375–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shadbegian, R., & Gray, W. (2003). What determines environmental performance at paper mills? The roles of abatement spending, regulation, and efficiency. Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy, 3(1), 1144–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sklivas, S. D. (1987). The strategic choice of managerial incentives. The RAND Journal of Economics, 18(3), 452–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vickers, J. (1985). Delegation and the theory of the firm. The Economic Journal, 95(Supplement: Conference Papers), 138–147.Google Scholar
  24. Vural, D. (2018). Disclosure practices by family firms: Evidence from Swedish publicly listed firms. Accounting in Europe, 15(3), 347–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang, L. F. S., & Wang, Y.-C. (2010). Input pricing and market share delegation in a vertically related market: Is the timing order relevant? International Journal of the Economics of Business, 17(2), 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang, Z. (2015). Delegation and vertical externalities. Economics Bulletin, 35(2), 1128–1135.Google Scholar
  27. Zaccour, G. (1983). Calcul des pseudo-équilibres sur des réseaux représentant des marchés séquentiels. M.Sc. thesis, H.E.C, Montreal.Google Scholar
  28. Zaccour, G. (1987). Théorie des jeux et marchés énergétiques: marché européen du gaz naturel et échanges d’éléctricité. Ph.D. thesis, HEC Montréal.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LEDiUniversité de Bourgogne-Franche ComtéDijonFrance
  2. 2.CEE-MUniversité de Montpellier, Inra, Cnrs, SupAgroMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations