Skip to main content

Assessment of eCall’s Effects on the Economy and Automotive Industry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data-Centric Business and Applications

Abstract

eCall is a Pan European automatic emergency call system for cars. All new types of vehicles used within the European Union must be equipped with hardware enabling the operation of eCall. Despite being targeted by many researchers and official authorities, there remain many questions regarding the effects of this technology. Building on the expected monetary and non-monetary benefits of eCall, as well as other projections about the system’s capabilities, in this study, we used the Delphi method to address unanswered issues and to examine the logic behind earlier projections of eCall’s effects on both the automotive industry and the economy. In addition to presenting our findings from three bilingual rounds of the Delphi method with 16 experts from the automotive industry, we also assess the public perception of this technology and its future development. Lastly, we present the opinions of experts regarding eCall’s potential to ensure annual monetary benefits of €20 billion, or more based on the prices of cars augmented by the implementation of eCall and its future link with autonomous cars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. WHO (2015) Global status report on road safety 2015. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2015/en/. Accessed 11 June 11 2018

  2. WHO (2017) Managing speed. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/publications/road_traffic/managing-speed/en/. Accessed 11 June 2018

  3. EENA (2018) EENA Committees Document: eCall and open issues, 2018 revision. http://www.eena.org/download.asp?item_id=26. Accessed 15 June 2018

  4. European Commission (2005) The 2nd eSafety communication bringing eCall to citizens. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52005DC0431&qid=1528801388090&from=E. Accessed 18 June 18 2018

  5. European Commission (2018) EU road fatalities. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/sites/roadsafety/files/pdf/statistics/trends_figures.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2018

  6. Chariete A, Bakhouya M, Nait-Sidi-Moh A, Ait-Cheik-Bihi W, Gaber J, Kouta R, Wack M, Lorenz P (2016) A study of users’ acceptance and satisfaction of emergency call service. Int J Commun Syst 29(15):2279–2291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. European Commission (2018) Sustainable mobility for Europe: safe, connected, and clean. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2018%3A293%3AFIN. Accessed 29 June 2018

  8. Mladenow A, Kryvinska N, Strauss C (2012) Towards cloud-centric service environments. J Serv Sci Res 4(2):213–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Polaschek M, Zeppelzauer W, Kryvinska N, Strauss C (2012) Enterprise 2.0 integrated communication and collaboration platform: a conceptual viewpoint. In: 2012 26th international conference on advanced information networking and applications workshops (WAINA). IEEE, pp 1221–1226

    Google Scholar 

  10. Becker A, Mladenow A, Kryvinska N, Strauss C (2012) Evolving taxonomy of business models for mobile service delivery platform. Procedia Comput Sci 10:650–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kopetzky R, Günther M, Kryvinska N, Mladenow A, Strauss C, Stummer C (2013) Strategic management of disruptive technologies: a practical framework in the context of voice services and of computing towards the cloud. Int J Grid Util Comput 4(1):47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lego T, Mladenow A, Novak NM, Strauss C (2017) The economic value of an emergency call system. In: International conference on research and practical issues of enterprise information systems. Springer, Cham, pp 56–66

    Google Scholar 

  13. Iparraguirre O, Brazalez A (2016) Communication technologies for vehicles: eCall. In: Communication technologies for vehicles. Lecture notes in computer science, pp 103–110

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kubát D, Weinlich P, Semerádová T (2014) Data security concerns of future eCall users. In: IDIMT 2014 proceedings, pp 21–27

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sihvola N, Luoma J, Schirkoff A, Salo J, Karkola K (2009) In-depth evaluation of the effects of an automatic emergency call system on road fatalities. Eur Transp Res Rev 1(3):99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Acea.be (2018) Key figures. https://www.acea.be/statistics/tag/category/key-figures. Accessed 10 July 2018

  17. European Commission (2013) Proposal for a decision of the European parliament and of the council on the deployment of the interoperable EU-wide eCall. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013PC0315&from=EN. Accessed 10 April 2018

  18. Cabo M, Fernandes F, Pereira T, Fonseca B, Paredes H (2014) Universal access to eCall system. Procedia Comput Sci 27:104–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Journal of the EU (2014) Decision No 585/2014/EU of the European parliament and of the council of 15 May 2014 on the deployment of the interoperable EU-wide eCall service. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32014D0585. Accessed 20 April 2018

  20. Bonyár A, Géczy A, Krammer O, Sántha H, Illés B, Kámán J, Szalay Z, Hanák P, Harsányi G (2017) A review on current eCall systems for autonomous car accident detection. In: 40th international Spring seminar on electronics technology (ISSE). IEEE, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  21. WHO (2013) Global status report on road safety 2013. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2013/en/. Accessed 11 June 2018

  22. European Commission (2016) EU road fatalities. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/sites/roadsafety/files/pdf/observatory/trends_figures.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2018

  23. Card WI, Mooney GH (1977) What is the monetary value of human life? Br Med J 2:1627–1629

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rice DP, Cooper BS (1977) The economic value of human life. Am J Public Health Nations Health 57(11):1954–1966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Idnes.cz (2018) Cena za život ztracený při dopravní nehodě: více než 19 milionů korun. https://zpravy.idnes.cz/cdv-analyza-cena-zivota-dopravni-nehody-f01-/domaci.aspx?c=A180131_101655_domaci_hell. Accessed 10 July 2018

  26. Guerrini F (2014) Traffic congestion costs Americans $124 billion a year. The Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2014/10/14/traffic-congestion-costs-americans-124-billion-a-year-report-says/#594bc058c107. Accessed 11 June 2018

  27. Walters AA (1961) The theory and measurement of private and social cost of highway congestion. Econometrica 29(4):676–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Arnott R, Small K (1994) The economics of traffic congestion. Am Sci 82(5):446–455

    Google Scholar 

  29. van Woensel T, Cruz FRB (2009) A stochastic approach to traffic congestion costs. Comput Oper Res 36:1731–1739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. de Palma A, Lindsey R (2011) Traffic congestion pricing methodologies and technologies. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 19(6):1377–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McKinsey&Co (2016) An integrated perspective on the future of mobility. http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability-and-resource-productivity/our-insights/an-integrated-perspective-on-the-future-of-mobility. Accessed 20 May 2017

  32. Goodwin P (2004) The economic costs of road traffic congestion. ESRC Transport Studies Unit University College London

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bryans JW (2017) The Internet of Automotive Things: vulnerabilities, risks and policy implications. J Cyber Policy 2(2):185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Carutasu G, Botezatu C, Botezatu MA (2016) Expanding eCall from cars to other means of transport. J Inf Syst Oper Manag 10(2):354–363

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bönninger J (2015) Mobilität im 21. Jahrhundert: sicher, sauber, datengeschützt. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit, pp 388–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Journal of the EU (2017) Commission implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/78 of July 2016 establishing administrative provisions for the EC type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to their 112-based eCall in-vehicle systems and uniform conditions for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2015/758 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the privacy and data protection of users of such systems. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017R0078&from=EN. Accessed 15 June 2018

  37. European Commission (2016) European Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) of 12.9.2016 establishing detailed technical requirements and test procedures for the EC type approval of motor vehicles with respect to their 112-based eCall in-vehicles systems, of 112-based eCall in-vehicle separate technical units and components and supplementing and amending Regulation (EU) 2015/758 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the applicable standards. http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/3/2016/EN/C-2016-5709-F1-EN-MAIN-PART-1.PDF. Accessed 10 April 2018

  38. Geuens C, Dumortier J (2010) Mandatory implementation for in-vehicle eCall: privacy compatible? Comput Law Secur Rev 26(4):385–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ponte G, Ryan GA, Anderson RWG (2016) An estimate of the effectiveness of an in-vehicle automatic collision notification system in reducing road crash fatalities in South Australia. Traffic Inj Prev 17(3):258–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. European Commission (2017) 2016 road safety statistics: what is behind the figures? http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-17-675_en.htm. Accessed 2 July 2018

  41. Harnischmacher F, Cosyns C, Grugl KM, Moerbe M, Portouli E, Savaresi SM (2016) State of the art assessment Powered Two-Wheeler (P2W) eCall. In: 11th ITS European congress

    Google Scholar 

  42. Piao J, Beecroft M, McDonald M (2010) Vehicle positioning for improving road safety. Transp Rev 30(6):701–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Journal of the EU (2015) Regulation (EU) 2015/758 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2015 concerning type-approval requirements for the deployment of the eCall in-vehicle system based on the 112 Service and amending Directive 2007/46/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri = CELEX:32015R0758&from=EN. Accessed 18 June 2018

  44. Journal of the EU (2017) Deployment of the eCall in-vehicle system ***I European Parliament legislative resolution of 26 February 2014 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning type-approval requirements for the deployment of the eCall in-vehicle system and amending Directive 2007/46/EC (COM(2013)0316—C7-0174/2013—2013/0165(COD)) (first reading). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52014AP0154&qid=1528801388090&from=EN. Accessed 15 June 2018

  45. Laiou A, Yannis G, Milotti A, Piccoli G (2016) Road safety interventions in South East Europe. Transp Res 14:3406–3415

    Google Scholar 

  46. Schellekens M (2016) Car hacking: navigating the regulatory landscape. Comput Law Secur Rev 32:307–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Öörni R, Goulart A (2017) In-vehicle emergency call services: eCall and beyond. IEEE Commun Mag 55(1):159–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen L, Englund C (2018) Every second counts: integrating edge computing and service oriented architecture for automatic emergency management. J Adv Transp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  49. Urbano M, Alam M, Ferreira J, Fonseca J, Simões P (2017) Cooperative driver stress sensing integration with eCall system for improved road safety. In: 17th international conference on smart technologies. IEEE, pp 883–888

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sdongos E, Bolovinou A, Tsogas M, Amditis A, Guerra B, Manso M (2017) Next generation automated emergency calls. In: 14th annual consumer communications and networking conference. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  51. Melcher V, Diederichs F, Maestre R, Hofmann C, Nacenta JM, van Gent J, Kusic D, Žagar B (2015) Smart vital signs and accident monitoring system for motorcyclists embedded in helmets and garments for advanced eCall emergency assistance and health analysis monitoring. Procedia Manuf 3:3208–3213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Newmobility news (2018) eCall emergency system obligatory in EU cars. https://newmobility.news/2018/03/29/ecall-emergency-system-obligatory-in-eu-cars. Accessed 2 July 2018

  53. European Parliament (2015) Automatic emergency call devices in all new car models from spring 2018. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20150424IPR45714/automatic-emergency-call-devices-in-all-new-car-models-from-spring-2018. Accessed 2 July 2018

  54. European Commission (2006) Bringing eCall back on track—action plan (3rd eSafety communication). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52006DC0723&qid=1528801388090&from=EN. Accessed 18 June 2018

  55. European Commission (2009) eCall: time for deployment. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52009DC0434&qid=1528801388090&from=EN. Accessed 18 June 2018

  56. dan Barca C (2016) Graphical interface for eCall incidents. Database Syst J 7(4):47–53

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chochliouros IP, Spiliopoulou-Chochliourou AS, Lalopoulos GK (2005) Emergency call (eCall) Services based on approved E-112 regulations and infrastructures: a solution to improve security and release of road help. FITCE 2005 Congress: 76–84

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Strauss .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lego, T., Mladenow, A., Strauss, C. (2020). Assessment of eCall’s Effects on the Economy and Automotive Industry. In: Kryvinska, N., Greguš, M. (eds) Data-Centric Business and Applications. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19069-9_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics