Abstract
While elaboration of meanings of ecological discomforts in the contexts of risk, interests, identity, relationships, and communities is important in that it offers better self-understanding, it is important to understand how such transparency can further impact embodied practices of coexistence in everyday life. To do this, I will bring up two examples of actual practices developed in response to the arrivals of recolonizing animals into human spaces. I will then proceed to show how the concepts and interpretations presented in the previous chapters can illuminate what is happening in these practices, both in terms of what they strive for and how they fall short of fulfilling their aims. Finally, it will be shown how a better understanding predicated upon the previous analyses can contribute to improving these practices. This will include illustrating how the conceptual tools proposed throughout this book can be helpful in approaching discomforting encounters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
http://www.westernlaw.org/article/restoring-mexican-gray-wolf, accessed: 13.01.2017.
- 2.
https://boulderbearcoalition.org/two-strike-policy/, accessed: 13.01.2017.
- 3.
An alternative for animals that are not capable of sophisticated learning would be the introduction of some technologies that would control, constrain, or manipulate the animals in question. Here, too, the assumption is that such techniques must be able to actually work—if not in all instances than at least in general.
References
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things With Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boonman-Berson, Susan. 2016. Blurred boundaries in wildlife management practices. In Animal Ethics in the Age of Humans: Blurring Boundaries in Human-Animal Relationships, ed. Bovenkerk Bernice, and Jozef Keulartz, 203–223. Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
Cooper, David E. 2003. Meaning. Chesham: Acumen.
Douglas, Mary. 1991. The idea of a home: A kind of space. Social Research 58 (1): 287–307.
Edward, Abbey. 1971. Desert Solitaire. A season in the Wilderness. New York: Ballantine Books.
Fudge, Erica. 2011. Pest friends. In Uncertainty in the City: Pets, Pests and Prey, ed. Bryndis Snæbjørnsdóttir and Mark Wilson, 50–70. Berlin: The Green Box.
Kahn Jr., Peter H. 2009. Cohabitating with the wild. Ecopsychology 1 (1): 38–46.
Searle, John R., and Speech Acts. 1969. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spencer, Rocky D., Richard A. Beausoleil, and Donald A. Martorello. 2007. How agencies respond to human–black bear conflicts: A survey of wildlife agencies in North America. Ursus 18 (2): 217–229.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tokarski, M. (2019). Conclusion: Practicing Coexistence. In: Hermeneutics of Human-Animal Relations in the Wake of Rewilding. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18971-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18971-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18970-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18971-6
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)