Skip to main content

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has revolutionized the traditional approach to colectomy. By minimizing trauma to the abdominal wall and the field of resection, MIS colectomy has been associated with less postoperative pain, shorter return of bowel function, and reduction in the hospital length of stay. Single-incision laparoscopy (SIL) is a derivative of traditional multiport laparoscopy, combining trocar and specimen extraction sites, with the intention of reducing pain and scarring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, et al. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2002;287:321–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen HH, Wexner SD, Iroatulam AJ, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy compares favorably with colectomy by laparotomy for reduction of postoperative ileus. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:61–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Inoue H, Takeshita K, Endo M. Single-port laparoscopy assisted appendectomy under local pneumoperitoneum condition. Surg Endosc. 1994;8:714–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Piskun G, Rajpal S. Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999;9:361–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Teixeira J, McGill K, Binenbaum S, et al. Laparoscopic single-site surgery for placement of an adjustable gastric band: initial experience. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1409–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fader AN, Michener CM, Frasure HE, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy in endometrial cancer: surgical and survival outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16:333–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Color Dis. 2008;23:1013–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacob BP, Tong W, Reiner M, et al. Single incision total extraperitoneal (one SITE) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using a single access port device. Hernia. 2009;13:571–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ponsky LE, Cherullo EE, Sawyer M, et al. Single access site laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: initial clinical experience. J Endourol. 2008;22:663–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, et al. Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Color Dis. 2008;10:823–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bardakcioglu O, Ahmed S. Single incision laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for synchronous colon cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2010;14:257–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for benign disease. Color Dis. 2010;12:61–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Geisler DP, Condon ET, Remzi FH. Single incision laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileopouch anal anastomosis. Color Dis. 2010;12:941–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Papaconstantinou HT, Sharp N, Thomas JS. Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:72–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chew MH, Chang MH, Tan WS, et al. Conventional laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case cohort comparison of short-term outcomes in 144 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:471–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Waters JA, Rapp BM, Guzman MJ, et al. Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the first 100 resections. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:134–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen WT, Chang SC, Chiang HC, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical results. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1887–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vettoretto N, Cirocchi R, Randolph J, et al. Single incision laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis. 2014;16:O123–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Miyo M, Takemasa I, Ishihara H, et al. Long-term outcomes of single-site laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:664–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Poon JT, Cheung CW, Fan JK, et al. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2729–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, et al. Standard laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: early results of a randomized prospective study. Am J Surg. 2012;204:115–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Spinoglio G, Lenti LM, Ravazzoni F, et al. Evaluation of technical feasibility and safety of Single-Site robotic right colectomy: three case reports. Int J Med Robot. 2015;11:135–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Juo YY, Agarwal S, Luka S, et al. Single-Incision Robotic Colectomy (SIRC) case series: initial experience at a single center. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:1976–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vestweber B, Galetin T, Lammerting K, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: outcomes from 224 colonic resections performed at a single center using SILS. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:434–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Benlice C, Stocchi L, Costedio MM, et al. Impact of the specific extraction-site location on the risk of incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59:743–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:1037–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. van den Boezem PB, Velthuis S, Lourens HJ, et al. Single-incision and NOTES cholecystectomy, are there clinical or cosmetic advantages when compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy? World J Surg. 2014;38:25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yeung PP Jr, Bolden CR, Westreich D, et al. Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20:79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jenkins, C.N., Raskin, E.R. (2020). Single Incision Right Colectomy. In: Kim, J., Garcia-Aguilar, J. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Cancers of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18740-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18740-8_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18739-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18740-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics