Abstract
The article presents an electronic guide to the nonconformity of parts produced in an enterprise in the automotive industry. In visual inspection, it is very important to be familiar with errors that can potentially be detected at a given control position and clearly define the control criteria. In the automotive industry, in which products must conform to very high requirements, not only in terms of safety of use, but also appearance, repeatability and reproducibility of this product feature is extremely important. What appears to be helpful then is nonconformities catalogues, which contain pictures of possible defects and their descriptions. The innovatory approach of the guide consists in taking into account the needs of deaf and hearing-impaired people working in the quality control department and using Orbitvu 3D to take pictures of nonconformities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Sagi JS (1998) The interaction between quality control and production. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.113769
Hamrol A (2017) Management and quality engineering. Warsaw (PWN)
Hamrol A (2015) Strategies and practices of efficient operation. Lean Six Sigma and other, Warsaw (PWN)
Benbow DW, Berger RW, Eishenawy AK, Walker HF (2002) The certified quality engineer handbook. ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee
Sika R, Rogalewicz M (2017) Demerit control chart as a decision support tool in quality control of ductile cast-iron casting process. In: MATEC web of conferences, vol 121, p 05007. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712105007
Włodarczyk K, Kowalczyk J, Ulbrich D, Selech J (2017) A review of non-destructive evaluation methods of elements of prototype module of drying line used to receive RDF fuel from waste recycling. Procedia Eng 192:959–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.165
Vieira G, Reis L, Varela MLR, Machado J, Trojanowska J (2016) Integrated platform for real-time control and production and productivity monitoring and analysis. Rom Rev Precis Mech Opt Mechatron 50:119–127
Knop K (2017) Analiza udziału i znaczenia stosowanych metod kontroli jakości do wykrywania niezgodności profili aluminiowych. Systemy wspomagania w inżynierii produkcji. Jakość, Bezpieczeństwo, Środowisko 6(7):129–142
Starzyńska B, Szajkowska K, Diering M, Rocha A, Reis LP (2018) A study of raters agreement in quality inspection with the participation of hearing disabled employees. In: Hamrol A, Ciszak O, Legutko S, Jurczyk M (eds) Advances in manufacturing. Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Springer, Cham, pp 881–888
Jasarevic S, Diering M, Brdarevic S (2012) Opinions of the consultants and certification houses regarding the quality factors and achieved effects of the introduced quality system. Tehnicki Vjesnik-Technical Gazette 19(2):211–220
Kujawińska A, Vogt K, Diering M, Rogalewicz M, Waigaonkar SD (2018) Organization of visual inspection and its impact on the effectiveness of inspection. In: Hamrol A, Ciszak O, Legutko S, Jurczyk M (eds) Advances in manufacturing. Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Springer, Cham, pp 899–909
Kujawińska A, Vogt K (2015) Human factors in visual quality control. Manage Prod Eng Rev 6(2):25–31. https://doi.org/10.1515/mper-2015-0013
Chi CF, Drury C (2001) Limits to human optimization in inspection performance. Int J Syst Sci 32(6):689–701
Jiang X, Gramopadhye AK, Melloy BJ, Grimes LW (2003) Evaluation of best system performance: human, automated, and hybrid inspection systems. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind 13(2):137–152
Lee J, Ko KW, Lee S (2016) Visual inspection system of the defect of collets for wafer handling process. Int J Control Autom 9:129–138
See JE (2015) Visual inspection reliability for precision manufactured parts. Hum Factors 57:1427–1442
Kleiner BM, Drury CG (1992) Design and evaluation of an inspection training program. Appl Ergon 24:75–82
See J, Drury CG, Speed A, Khalandi N (2017) The role of visual inspection in the 21st century. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Ann Meet 61(1):262–266
Suszyński M, Butlewski M, Stempowska R (2017) Ergonomic solutions to support forced static positions at work. In: MATEC web of conferences, vol 137, p 01015
Acknowledgments
The paper is prepared and financed by scientific statutory research conducted by Chair of Management and Production Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Management, Poznan University of Technology, Poland, supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education from the financial means in 2018 (02/23/DSPB/7716).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kujawińska, A., Rogalewicz, M., Szajkowska, K., Piotrowski, W., Parczewski, W. (2019). Electronic Nonconformities Guide as a Tool to Support Visual Inspection. In: Diering, M., Wieczorowski, M., Brown, C. (eds) Advances in Manufacturing II. MANUFACTURING 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18682-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18682-1_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18681-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18682-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)