Advertisement

The Juridification of School Bullying in Sweden: The Emerging Struggle Between the Scientific-Based Pedagogical Discourse and the Legal Discourse

  • Robert ThornbergEmail author
Chapter
  • 184 Downloads
Part of the Young People and Learning Processes in School and Everyday Life book series (YPLP, volume 2)

Abstract

The international school bullying research field has its origin in Sweden, as it was initiated by the work of Olweus during the 1970s. His definition of bullying is the most widely spread and used definition in the international school bullying research field. At the same time, there has been and still is an ongoing debate and critique regarding the definition among international scholars, including Nordic and Swedish scholars. In this chapter, I will discuss the juridification of school bullying and the emerging struggle between a scientific discourse and a legal discourse as the guiding national discourse for schools’ anti-bullying practises in Sweden by giving a very brief review of how the definition and understanding of bullying have been disputed, including in Sweden, and the historical changes in the Swedish school policy from a scientific-based pedagogical discourse to a de-professionalizing legal discourse in relation to how schools should understand and counteract bullying.

References

  1. Agency for School Improvement. (2007). Granskning och utvärdering av program mot mobbning. In Myndigheten för skolutveckling. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  2. Aspenlieder, L., Buchanan, C. M., McDougall, P., & Sippola, L. K. (2009). Gender nonconformity and peer victimization in pre- and early adolescence. European Journal of Developmental Science, 3(1), 3–16.Google Scholar
  3. Bliding, M. (2002). Vad är mobbning: Om mobbningsbegreppet och den praktiska vardagen. In B. Andersson & S. Hägglund (Eds.), Barnets rättigheter (Rapport 3 från Värdegrunden) (pp. 205–224). Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.Google Scholar
  4. Bliding, M. (2004). Inneslutandets och uteslutandes praktik: En studie av barns relationsarbete i skolan (Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences 214). Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.Google Scholar
  5. Canty, J., Stubbe, M., Steers, D., & Collings, S. (2016). The trouble with bullying: Deconstructing the conventional definition of bullying for a child-centred investigation into children’s use of social media. Children & Society, 30(1), 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrera, M. V., DePalma, R., & Lameiras, M. (2011). Toward a more comprehensive understanding of bullying in school settings. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 479–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chester, K. L., Callaghan, M., Cosma, A., Donnelly, P., Craig, W., Walsh, S., & Molcho, M. (2015). Cross-national time trends in bullying victimization in 33 countries among children aged 11, 13 and 15 from 2002 to 2010. European Journal of Public Health, 25(Suppl 2), 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Copeland, W. E., Wolke, D., Angold, A., & Costello, E. J. (2013). Adult psychiatric outcomes of bullying and being bullied by peers in childhood and adolescence. JAMA Psychiatry, 70(4), 419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Copeland, W. E., Wolke, D., Lereya, S. T., Shanahan, L., Worthman, C., & Costello, E. J. (2014). Childhood bullying involvement predicts low-grade systemic inflammation into adulthood. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(21), 7570–7575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Craig, W., Harel-Fisch, Y., Fogel-Grinvald, H., Dostaler, S., Hetland, J., Simons-Morton, B., Molcho, M., de Mato, M. G., Overpeck, M., Due, P., Pickett, W., & The HBSC Violence & Injuries Prevention Focus Group & the HBSC Bullying Writing Group. (2009). A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40 countries. International Journal of Public Health, 54(Suppl 2), S216–S224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Due, P., Holstein, B. E., Lynch, J., Diderichsen, F., Gabhain, S. N., Scheidt, P., Currie, C., & The Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children Bullying Working Group. (2005). Bullying and symptoms among school-aged children: International comparative cross sectional study in 28 countries. European Journal of Public Health, 15(2), 128–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elamé, E. (2013). Discriminatory bullying: A new intercultural challenge. Venice: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (Eds.). (2004). Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (Eds.). (2011). Bullying in North American schools (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Evans-Lacko, S., Takizawa, R., Brimblecombe, N., King, D., Knapp, M., Maughan, B., & Arsenault, L. (2017). Childhood bullying victimization is associated with use of mental health services over five decades: A longitudinal nationally representative cohort study. Psychological Medicine, 47(1), 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Folkhälsomyndigheten. (2018). Skolbarns hälsovanor i Sverige 2017/18: Grundrapport. Stockholm: Folkhälsomyndigheten.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. In An introduction (Vol. 1). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  18. Frånberg, G.-M., & Gill, P. (2009). Vad är mobbning? In Skolverket (Ed.), På tal om mobbning – och det som görs (pp. 17–40). Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  19. Frånberg, G.-M., & Wrethander, M. (2009). Om det som görs mot mobbning – analys av åtta program. In Skolverket (Ed.), På tal om mobbning – och det som görs (pp. 96–199). Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  20. Frånberg, G.-M., & Wrethander, M. (2011). Mobbning – en social konstruktion? Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  21. Friedman, M. S., Koeske, G. F., Silvestre, A. J., Korr, W. S., & Sites, E. W. (2006). The impact of gender-role non-conforming behavior, bullying, and social support on suicidality among gay male youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38(5), 621–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farrington, D. P., Lösel, F., Ttofi, M. M., & Theodorakis, N. (2012). School bullying, depression and offending behav-iour later in life: An updated systematic review of longitudinal studies. Stockholm: Brottsförebyggande rådet.Google Scholar
  23. Gaffney, H., Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2019). Examining the effectiveness of school-bullying intervention programs globally: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1(1), 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2013). Bullied children and psychosomatic problems: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 132(4), 720–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guba, E. G. (Ed.). (1990). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Hammarén, N., Lunneblad, J., Johansson, T., & Odenbring, Y. (2015). The school as crime scene: Discourses on degrading treatment in Swedish schools. Power and Education, 7(3), 272–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hammersley, M. (2007). Educational research and teaching: A response to David Hargreaves’ TTA lecture. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Educational research and evidence-based practice (pp. 18–42). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Heinemann, P.-P. (1969). Apartheid. Liberal debatt, 22(2), 3–14.Google Scholar
  29. Heinemann, P.-P. (1972). Mobbning: Gruppvåld bland barn och vuxna. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.Google Scholar
  30. Herkama, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2016). Making large-scale, sustainable change: Experiences with the KiVa anti-bullying programme. In United Nations (Ed.), Ending the torment: Tackling bullying from the schoolyard to cyberspace (Ending violence against children, Sustainable Development Goals Target 16.2) (pp. 75–81). New York: Office of Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Violence against Children.Google Scholar
  31. Holt, M. K., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Polanin, J. R., Holland, K. M., DeGue, S., Matjasko, J. L., Wolfe, M., & Reid, G. (2015). Bullying and suicidal ideation and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 135(2), e496–e509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hong, J. S., & Garbarino, J. (2012). Risk and protective factors for homophobic bullying in schools: An application of the social-ecological framework. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Horton, P. (2011). School bullying and social and moral orders. Children & Society, 25(4), 268–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jimerson, S. R., Swearer, S. M., & Espelage, D. L. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Klomek, A. B., Sourander, A., & Elonheimo, H. (2015). Bullying by peers in childhood and effects on psychopathology, suicidality, and criminality in adulthood. Lancet Psychiatry, 2(10), 930–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kofoed, J., & Søndergaard, D. M. (Eds.). (2009). Mobning: Sociale processer på afveje. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.Google Scholar
  37. Kousholt, K., & Fisker, T. B. (2015). Approaches to reduce bullying in schools – A critical analysis from the viewpoint of first- and second-order perspectives on bullying. Children & Society, 29(6), 593–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Larsson, A. (2008). Mobbningsbegreppets uppkomst och förhistoria: En begreppshistorisk analys. Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 13(1), 19–36.Google Scholar
  39. Lereya, S. T., Copeland, W. E., Costello, E. J., & Wolke, D. (2015). Adult mental health consequences of peer bullying and maltreatment in childhood: Two cohorts in two countries. Lancet Psychiatry, 2(6), 524–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lgr 11. (2011). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  41. Lgr 11 [rev. 2016] (2016). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011 (reviderad 2016). Stockholm: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
  42. Lgr 80. (1980). 1980 års läroplan för grundskolan: Mål och riktlinjer. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
  43. Limber, S. P. (2011). Development, evaluation, and future directions of the Olweus bullying prevention program. Journal of School Violence, 10(1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lorenz, K. (1968). Aggression: Dess bakgrund och natur. Stockholm: Nordstedt.Google Scholar
  45. Lpo 94. (1994). Läroplan för det obligatoriska skolväsendet, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  46. Meltzer, H., Vostanis, P., Ford, T., Bebbington, P., & Dennis, M. S. (2011). Victims of bullying in childhood and suicide attempts in adulthood. European Psychiatry, 26(8), 498–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Molcho, M., Craig, W., Due, P., Pickett, W., Harel-Fisch, Y., Overpeck, M., & The HBSC Bullying Writing Group. (2009). Cross-national time trends in bullying behaviour 1994–2006: Findings from Europe and North America. International Journal of Public Health, 54(Suppl 2), S225–S234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nordgren, K. (2009). Talet om mobbning – ett historiskt perspektiv. In Skolverket (Ed.), På tal om mobbning – och det som görs (pp. 44–95). Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  49. Olweus, D. (1973). Hackkycklingar och översittare: Forskning om skolmobbning. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
  50. Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. New York: Halsted Press.Google Scholar
  51. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  52. Olweus, D. (2010). Understanding and researching bullying: Some critical issues. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 9–33). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Olweus, D. & Limber, S. (2002). Bullying prevention program (bok nr. 9 i serien Blueprints for violence prevention; series red. D. S. Elliott). Boulder: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado at Boulder.Google Scholar
  54. Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Olweus bullying prevention program: Teacher guide. Center City: Hazelden.Google Scholar
  55. Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2010). The Olweus bullying prevention program: Implementation and evaluation over two decades. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 377–401). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Palmer, S. B., & Abbott, N. (2018). Bystander responses to bias-based bullying in schools: A developmental intergroup approach. Child Development Perspectives, 12(1), 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reynolds, D. (2005). “World class” school improvement: An analysis of the implications of recent international school effectiveness and school improvement research for improving practice. In D. Hopkins (Ed.), The practice and theory of school improvement: International handbook of educational change (pp. 241–251). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ringrose, J., & Renold, E. (2010). Normative cruelties and gender deviants: The performative effects of bully discourses for girls and boys in school. British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rose, C. A. (2011). Bullying among students with disabilities. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in North American schools (2nd ed., pp. 34–44). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Rose, C. A., Monda-Amaya, L. E., & Espelage, D. (2011). Bullying perpetration and victimization in special education: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 32(2), 114–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Salmivalli, C., & Poskiparta, E. (2012). KiVa antibullying program: Overview of evaluation studies based on a randomized controlled trial and national rollout in Finland. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 6, 294–302.Google Scholar
  62. Salmivalli, C., Kärnä, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Counteracting bullying in Finland: The KiVa program and its effects on different forms of being bullied. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(5), 405–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schott, R. M. (2014). The social concept of bullying: Philosophical reflections on definitions. In R. M. Schott & D. M. Søndergaard (Eds.), School bullying: New theories in context (pp. 21–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schott, R. M., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2014). Introduction: New approaches to school bullying. In R. M. Schott & D. M. Søndergaard (Eds.), School bullying: New theories in context (pp. 1–17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sentenac, M., Arnaud, C., Gavin, A., Molcho, M., Gabhainn, S. N., & Godeau, E. (2012). Peer victimization among school-aged children with chronic conditions. Epidemiologic Reviews, 34, 120–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Silberg, J. L., Copeland, W., Linker, J., Moore, A. A., Roberson-Nay, R., & York, T. P. (2016). Psychiatric outcomes of bullying victimization: A study of discordant monozygotic twins. Psychological Medicine, 46(9), 1875–1883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. SOU. (2002:121). Skollag för kvalitet och likvärdighet. Retrieved from: http://www.regeringen.se/rattsdokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2002/12/sou-2002121/
  68. Swedish National Agency for Education. (1998). Gemensamhet i mångfalden: Skola i utveckling. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
  69. Swedish National Agency for Education. (1999). Ständigt. Alltid! Skolans värdegrund: Kommentarer till läroplaner. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
  70. Swedish National Agency for Education. (2001). Strategi för Skolverkets arbete med de demokratiska värdena: En sammanfattning. Stockholm: Skolverket.Google Scholar
  71. Swedish National Agency for Education. (2009). På tal om mobbning – och det som görs. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  72. Swedish National Agency for Education. (2011). Utvärdering av metoder mot mobbning (Rapport 353). Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  73. Swedish National Agency for Education. (2014). Främja, förebygga, upptäcka och åtgärda: Hur skolan kan arbeta mot trakasserier och kränkningar. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  74. Swedish National Agency for Education. (2016). Attityder till skolan 2015 (Rapport 438). Stockholm: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
  75. Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention. (2008). Effectiveness of programmes to reduce school bullying (Report prepared for Brå by Maria M. Ttofi, David P. Farrington and Anna C. Baldry). Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Crime Prevention.Google Scholar
  76. Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention. (2009). Effekter av anti-mobbningsprogram – vad säger forskningen? Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  77. Thornberg, R. (2015). The social dynamics of school bullying: The necessary dialogue between the blind men around the elephant and the possible meeting point at the social-ecological square. Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics, 3(2), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tsaousis, I. (2016). The relationship of self-esteem to bullying perpetration and peer victimization among schoolchildren and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 31, 186–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Volk, A. A., Dane, A. V., & Marini, Z. A. (2014). What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition. Developmental Review, 34(4), 327–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Volk, A. A., Veenstra, R., & Espelage, D. L. (2017). So you want to study bullying? Recommendations to enhance the validity, transparency, and compatibility of bullying research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 36, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wrethander, M. (2007). Inneslutning och uteslutning: Barns relationsarbete i skolan. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  83. Yang, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). Effectiveness of the KiVa antibullying programme on bully-victims, bullies and victims. Educational Research, 57(1), 80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Young, R., & Sweeting, H. (2004). Adolescent bullying, relationships, psychological Well-being, and gender-atypical behavior: A gender diagnosticity approach. Sex Roles, 50(7–8), 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioural Sciences and LearningLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations