Policing the School: Dialogues and Crime Reports

  • Thomas Johansson
  • Johannes LunnebladEmail author
Part of the Young People and Learning Processes in School and Everyday Life book series (YPLP, volume 2)


Regarding criminality and subversive behaviour, young people are seen both as a risk group and as a security risk. Consequently, there is a need to investigate categorizations and definitions of young people ‘at risk’. This chapter is based on a study designed as two interlinked case studies. The cases consist of principals and school health teams working closely with young students in the school, on the one hand, and hand police officers, on the other. The purpose of this design is to allow us to discuss and analyse different professional views and attitudes regarding school violence. The results indicate that both school officials and the police have problems making a clear distinction between the offender and the victim. However, they also show a difference in how school professionals and police officers approach this diffuseness. Whereas the school professionals tend to work relationally and try to solve conflicts and violence through dialogue and interaction, the police officers primarily see their role as identifying perpetrators and crimes. Furthermore, the results reveal that both professional groups put more focus on policing segregated areas. The police put segregated areas under surveillance, targeting young people and defining them as potential suspects. The teachers in segregated areas also tend to use a more juridical approach to school violence, especially compared to teachers in more affluent middle-class areas.


  1. Beach, D., & Sernhede, O. (2011). From learning to labour to learning for marginality: School segregation and marginalization in Swedish suburbs. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(2), 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, H. S. (1970). Sociological work: Method and substance. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  3. Casella, R. (2001). At zero tolerance: Punishment, prevention, and school violence. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  4. Coon, J. K., & Travis, L. F., III. (2012). The role of police in public schools: A comparison of principal and police reports of activities in schools. Police Practice and Research, 13(1), 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Estrada, F., Pettersson, T., & Shannon, D. (2012). Crime and criminology in Sweden. European Journal of Criminology, 9(6), 668–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Follesø, R. (2015). Youth at risk or terms at risk? Young, 23(3), 240–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  8. Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality (The will to knowledge) (Vol. 1). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  9. Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J., & Noguera, P. A. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin? Educational Researcher, 39(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jeffersson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1978/2013). Policing the crisis. Mugging, the state and law & order. London: Palgrave Mac Millan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Irwin, K., Davidson, J., & Hall-Sanchez, A. (2013). The race to punish in American schools: Class and race predictors of punitive school-crime control. Critical Criminology, 21(1), 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kelly, P. (2003). Growing up as risky business? Risks, surveillance and the institutionalized mistrust of youth. Journal of Youth Studies, 6(2), 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kupchik, A., Green, D. A., & Mowen, T. J. (2015). School punishment in the US and England: Divergent frames and responses. Youth Justice, 15(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Milani, T. M., & Jonsson, R. (2012). Who’s afraid of Rinkeby Swedish? Stylization, complicity, resistance. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 22(1), 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morris, E. W. (2005). “Tuck in that shirt!” Race, class, gender, and discipline in an urban school. Sociological Perspectives, 48(1), 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Na, C., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2013). Police officers in schools: Effects on school crime and the processing of offending behaviors. Justice Quarterly, 30(4), 619–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Skiba, R. J., Horner, R. H., Chung, C. G., Rausch, M. K., May, S. L., & Tobin, T. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40(1), 85.Google Scholar
  18. Swartz, K., Osborne, D. L., Dawson-Edwards, C., & Higgins, G. E. (2016). Policing schools: Examining the impact of place management activities on school violence. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(3), 465–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Theriot, M. T. (2009). School resource officers and the criminalization of student behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(3), 280–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tillyer, M. S., Fisher, B. S., & Wilcox, P. (2011). The effects of school crime prevention on students’ violent victimization, risk perception, and fear of crime: A multilevel opportunity perspective. Justice Quarterly, 28(2), 249–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wacquant, L. (2008). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  22. Watts, I. E., & Erevelles, N. (2004). These deadly times: Reconceptualizing school violence by using critical race theory and disability studies. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 271–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education, Communication and LearningUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations