Advertisement

The Many Faces of School Violence: Ambivalent Categorizations of Perpetrators and Victims

  • Johannes LunnebladEmail author
  • Thomas Johansson
Chapter
  • 183 Downloads
Part of the Young People and Learning Processes in School and Everyday Life book series (YPLP, volume 2)

Abstract

During the past decades, behaviour among students in the Swedish schools once described as teasing and fighting has become part of a legal discourse. It is possible to follow a transitional process and development, during this period, in which schools have become increasingly regulated by legal rules. This transition has been defined as the juridification of schools. Consequently, acts previously understood as political, social or moral issues are now concerns requiring legal decisions and laws. In this chapter, we discuss how school officials at different schools described various measures taken to deal with school violence. The school officials mainly reported physical violence to the police. However, reporting to the police was not necessarily linked to the degree of violence inflicted on students. Furthermore, the professionals filed police reports to clearly delineate what behaviour was not tolerated. However, rather than reporting to the police, the school officials also tried to solve ‘problems’ using social pedagogical interventions.

References

  1. Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., Braun, A., Hoskins, K., & Perryman, J. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergh, A., & Arneback, E. (2016). Hur villkorar juridifieringen lärarprofessionens arbete med skolans kunskaper och värden? [How does juridification condition the teaching profession’s work with educational knowledge and values?]. Utbildning och Demokrati, 25(1), 11–31.Google Scholar
  3. Billig, M. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Bjereld, Y. (2017). If they only knew: Bullying victimization among children and youth in the Nordic countries. Dissertation Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet, 2017. Göteborg.Google Scholar
  5. Coon, J. K., & Travis, L. F., III. (2012). The role of police in public schools: A comparison of principal and police reports of activities in schools. Police Practice and Research, 13(1), 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  7. Fransson, S. (2016). Juridifieringens konsekvenser av skolans område–en översikt av begrepp och principer. [Consequenses of juridification in an educational setting – an overview of concepts and principles]. Utbildning och Demokrati Tema: Juridifiering av skolan, 25(1), 33–51.Google Scholar
  8. Gibson, H. (2013). Home–school agreements: Explaining the growth of ‘juridification’ and contractualism in schools. Oxford Review of Education, 39(6), 780–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hacking, I. (2004). Between Michel Foucault and Erving Goffman: Between discourse in the abstract and face-to-face interaction. Economy and Society, 33(3), 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hammarén, N., Lunneblad, J., Johansson, T., & Odenbring, Y. (2015). The school as crime scene: Discourses on degrading treatment in Swedish schools. Power and Education, 7(3), 272–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hong, J. S., & Espelage, D. L. (2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hymel, S., & Swearer, S. M. (2015). Four decades of research on school bullying: An introduction. American Psychologist, 70(4), 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jenkins, R. (2000). Categorization: Identity, social process and epistemology. Current Sociology, 48(3), 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Larsson, J., Löfdahl, A., & Pérez Prieto, H. (2010). Rerouting: Discipline assessment and performativity in contemporary Swedish educational discourse. Education Inquiry, 1(3), 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lunneblad, J., Johansson, T., & Odenbring, Y. (2017). Relational trouble and student victimisation at schools–categorisation, caring and institutionalisation. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 25(3), 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morris, E. W. (2005). “Tuck in that shirt!” Race, class, gender, and discipline in an urban school. Sociological Perspectives, 48(1), 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Na, C., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2013). Police officers in schools: Effects on school crime and the processing of offending behaviors. Justice Quarterly, 30(4), 619–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ring, J. (2013). Brott bland ungdomar i årskurs nio: resultat från skolundersökningen om brott åren 1995–2008 [Crime among young people in grade nine: Results from the national survey of crime 1995–2012]. Stockholm: Brottsförebyggande rådet.Google Scholar
  19. Ringrose, J., & Rawlings, V. (2015). Posthuman performativity, gender and “school bullying”: Exploring the material-discursive intra-actions of skirts, hair, sluts, and poofs. Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics, 3(2), 80–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Robinson, K., Davies, C., & Saltmarsh, S. (2012). Introduction: The case for rethinking school violence. In C. Davies, K. Robinson, & S. Saltmarsh (Eds.), Rethinking school violence (pp. 1–18). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Theriot, M. T. (2009). School resource officers and the criminalization of student behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(3), 280–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thornberg, R. (2015). School bullying as a collective action: Stigma processes and identity struggling. Children & Society, 29(4), 310–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vainik, A. (2017). Polisanmälningar i grundskolan. [Police-reported School Violence in Sweden]. Växjö.Google Scholar
  24. Vainik, A. L., & Kassman, A. (2018). Police-reported school violence among children below the age of criminal responsibility in Sweden–signs of increased sensitivity and segregation? Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 19(1), 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wästerfors, D. (2016). Playfights as trouble and respite. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 45(2), 168–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yoon, J., & Bauman, S. (2014). Teachers: A critical but overlooked component of bullying prevention and intervention. Theory Into Practice, 53(4), 308–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education, Communication and LearningUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations