Introduction: School Violence in the Nordic Countries – A Changing Sociocultural Landscape

  • Johannes LunnebladEmail author
Part of the Young People and Learning Processes in School and Everyday Life book series (YPLP, volume 2)


The Nordic countries are known for their progressive education, which places a strong emphasis on equality. However, these societies have experienced a number of significant school reforms, leading to increased demands on students to be disciplined, well-behaved and respectful. Moreover, in the Nordic context, the tendency of schools to treat unruly behaviour, bullying and violence as crimes is partly a new phenomenon. The process of increased regulation by law has been labelled juridification. As a result of this process, what were previously considered to be primarily pedagogical responsibilities and challenges have become subjects to legal consideration. The juridification of education has thus not only come to influence the requirements placed on professionals working at schools, but also made schools’ obligation to support the individual child stronger.


  1. Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., Braun, A., Hoskins, K., & Perryman, J. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beach, D., & Sernhede, O. (2011). From learning to labour to learning for marginality: School segregation and marginalization in Swedish suburbs. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(2), 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergh, A., & Arneback, E. (2016). Hur villkorar juridifieringen lärarprofessionens arbete med skolans kunskaper och värden? [How does juridification condition the teaching profession’s work with educational knowledge and values?]. Utbildning och Demokrati, 25(1), 11–31.Google Scholar
  4. Bergh, A., & Englund, T. (2014). A changed language of education with new actors and solutions: the authorization of promotion and prevention programmes in Swedish schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(6), 778–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blichner, L. C., & Molander, A. (2008). Mapping juridification. European Law Journal, 14(1), 36–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlbaum, S. (2016). Juridifiering och utbildningval: Konsekvenser av elevers och studenters rättigheter. [Juridification and choice of education. Consequences of student rights]. Utbildning och Demokrati, 25(1), 53–72.Google Scholar
  7. Cater, K. Å., Andershed, A.-K., & Andershed, H. (2014). Youth victimization in Sweden: Prevalence, characteristics and relation to mental health and behavioral problems in young adulthood. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(8), 1290–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahlstedt, M., & Fejes, A. (2017). Shaping entrepreneurial citizens: A genealogy of entrepreneurship education in Sweden. Critical Studies in Education, 2017, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elonheimo, H., Gyllenberg, D., Huttunen, J., Ristkari, T., Sillanmäki, L., & Sourander, A. (2014). Criminal offending among males and females between ages 15 and 30 in a population-based nationwide 1981 birth cohort: Results from the FinnCrime Study. Journal of Adolescence, 37(8), 1269–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Englund, T. (2016). On moral education through deliberative communication. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(1), 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Estrada, F., Pettersson, T., & Shannon, D. (2012). Crime and criminology in Sweden. European Journal of Criminology, 9(6), 668–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fransson, S. (2016). Juridifieringens konsekvenser av skolans område–en översikt av begrepp och principer. [Consequenses of juridification in educational setting – An overview of concepts and principles]. Utbildning och Demokrati. Tema: Juridifiering av skolan, 25(1), 33–51.Google Scholar
  13. Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J., & Noguera, P. A. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin? Educational Researcher, 39(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hammarén, N., Lunneblad, J., Johansson, T., & Odenbring, Y. (2015). The school as crime scene: Discourses on degrading treatment in Swedish schools. Power and Education, 7(3), 272–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hatch, T. (2013). Beneath the surface of accountability: Answerability, responsibility and capacity-building in recent education reforms in Norway. Journal of Educational Change, 14(2), 113–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hellblom-Thibblin, T. (2017). Challenges and dilemmas – A conceptual approach to children’s diversity in school. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 2017, 1–15.Google Scholar
  17. Hirschfield, P. J. (2008). Preparing for prison? The criminalization of school discipline in the USA. Theoretical Criminology, 12(1), 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hjörne, E., & Säljö, R. (2014). Defining student diversity: Categorizing and processes of marginalization in Swedish schools. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 19(3), 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kivivuori, J., & Bernburg, J. G. (2011). Delinquency research in the Nordic countries. Crime and Justice, 40(1), 405–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lappi-Seppälä, T. (2008). Trust, welfare, and political culture: Explaining differences in national penal policies. Crime and Justice, 37(1), 313–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lappi-Seppälä, T. (2016). Nordic sentencing. Crime and Justice, 45(1), 17–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Larsson, J. (2014). A piece of resistance: Exploring behaviour assessment and political subjectification in a Swedish upper secondary school. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(5), 626–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Löfstrand, C. H. (2009). Supporting young crime victims: Discursive environments and formula narratives. Journal of Youth Studies, 12(6), 711–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Madsen, O. J. (2014). The therapeutic turn: How psychology altered western culture. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ostrowicka, H. (2012). Suitable enemies? Governmentality of youth: Youth as a threat. European Educational Research Journal, 11(4), 534–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ring, J., & Svensson, R. (2007). Social class and criminality among young people: A study considering the effects of school achievement as a mediating factor on the basis of Swedish register and self-report data. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 8(2), 210–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Robinson, K., Davies, C., & Saltmarsh, S. (2012). Introduction: The case for rethinking school violence. In C. Davies, K. Robinson, & S. Saltmarsh (Eds.), Rethinking school violence (pp. 1–18). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Sivenbring, J. (2017). Demokratiseringens dilemman i de nordiska handlingsplanerna mot våldsbejakande extremism [Democratizing dilemmas in the Nordic actionplans against violent extremism]. Göteborg: Segerstedtinstitutet.Google Scholar
  29. Skiba, R. J., Horner, R. H., Chung, C. G., Rausch, M. K., May, S. L., & Tobin, T. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40(1), 85–107.Google Scholar
  30. Svensson, R., & Ring, J. (2007). Trends in self-reported youth crime and victimization in Sweden, 1995–2005. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 8(2), 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Swedish National Agency for Education. (2012). Allmänna råd för arbetet mot diskriminering och kränkande behandling [General advice to prevent discrimination and offensive treatment]. Stockholm: Skolverket.Google Scholar
  32. Theriot, M. T. (2009). School resource officers and the criminalization of student behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(3), 280–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Träskman, P. O. (2015). Brottslighet och brottskontroll i Finland och de andra Nordiska länderna: Banbrytare eller eftersläntrare? [Violence and crime control in Finland and the other Nordic countries]. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab, 102(2).Google Scholar
  34. Vainik, A. L., & Kassman, A. (2018). Police-reported school violence among children below the age of criminal responsibility in Sweden–signs of increased sensitivity and segregation? Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 19(1), 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wikström, P. O. H., & Loeber, R. (2000). Do disadvantaged neighborhoods cause well-adjusted children to become adolescent delinquents? A study of male juvenile serious offending, individual risk and protective factors, and neighborhood context. Criminology, 38(4), 1109–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education, Communication and LearningUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations