Skip to main content

From Civic Virtues to Democratic Habits

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 243 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter endeavors to prove the relevance of the wide view of democracy by comparing the philosophical grammar of democratic habits with the most promising contemporary attempt at revivifying the personal dimension of politics, which is the republican theory of civic virtues. The chapter shows what is to be gained by dropping the notion of virtue and replacing it with that of habits, why democratic habits rather than civic virtues provides us with sharp conceptual tools to analyze how personal factors contribute to the democratic quality of a polity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an informed discussion, see Macedo (1990).

  2. 2.

    See Dagger (1997), Maynor (2003), Burtt (1993), Honohan (2003), Peterson (2011).

  3. 3.

    See Maynor (2003, 42) and Pettit (1997, 207).

  4. 4.

    The most comprehensive study of the notion of habit in the pragmatist tradition is Kilpinen (2000). In this valuable book, the reader will find plenty of information concerning the theoretical function this notion has played in the thought of the main figures belonging to this tradition, with an emphasis on theories of action.

  5. 5.

    Here meant in the sense of the French ‘psychologie des foules’ popularized by authors such as Gustave Le Bon at the turn of the century.

  6. 6.

    For compelling analyses focusing on habits of racial discrimination, see Sullivan (2006), MacMullan (2009), Alexander (2012). Along similar lines, and still in a pragmatist-wise perspective, José Medina (Medina, 2012) proposes an insightful analysis of the habitual, tacit texture of social injustice.

References

  • Alexander, M. (2012). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtt, S. (1990). The good citizen’s psyche: On the psychology of civic virtue. Polity, 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burtt, S. (1993). The politics of virtue today: A critique and a proposal. American Political Science Review 87(02), 360–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camic, C. (1986). The matter of habit. American Journal of Sociology, 1039–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagger, R. (1997). Civic virtues: Rights, citizenship and republican liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct. The Middle Works, 1899–1924, vol. 14. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and its Problems. The Later Works, 1925–1953, vol. 2. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, M. (2003). Die Kreativität der Gewohnheit: Grundzüge einer pragmatistischen Demokratietheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honohan, I. (2003). Civic republicanism. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hookway, C. (1990). Critical Common-Sensism and Rational Self-Control. Noûs 24(3), 397–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology: In 2 volumes (First ed. 1890 ed.). Dover Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpinen, E. (2000). The enormous fly-wheel of society: Pragmatism’s habitual conception of action and social theory. Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macedo, S. (1990). Liberal virtues: Citizenship, virtue, and community in liberal constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMullan, T. (2009). Habits of Whiteness. A Pragmatist Reconstruction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynor, J. (2003). Republicanism in the modern world. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina, J. (2012). The Epistemology of Resistance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, A. (1990). Citizenship: An unnatural practice? The Political Quarterly 61(2), 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1998). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings. Volume 1. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, A. (2011). Civic Republicanism and Civic Education: The Education of Citizens. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. (1998). Democracy’s discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneewind, J. B. (1990). The misfortunes of virtue. Ethics, 42–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, S. (2006). Revealing whiteness. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Frega, R. (2019). From Civic Virtues to Democratic Habits. In: Pragmatism and the Wide View of Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18561-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics