Advertisement

Douglas-Fir Provenance and Breeding

  • C. J. A. Shelbourne
Chapter

Abstract

Trials of Douglas-fir were planted from the late Egon Larsen’s two main seed collections. The 1957-planted trials were based on commercial seedlots ranging from north Washington (Darrington) to Snoqualmie Forest in southern Oregon. The more valuable collection formed the basis of the 1959-planted trials and derived from coastal provenances, ranging from north Washington to Santa Cruz, California. However, the breeding programme was wrongly based on selections in Kaingaroa Forest stands from Washington and was put on hold for over 20 years. Further seed collections were made by Charlie Low and Mark Miller in 1993 from 222 trees in coastal south Oregon and California, and these, along with 188 selections made in the 1959 provenance trials, formed the basis of a new Douglas-fir breeding programme, whose development is also reported.

Keywords

Douglas-fir Coastal provenances Selection 1988 Grading 

References

  1. 14. G.B. Sweet 1963: Some provenance differences in Pseudotsuga menziesii. 1. Seed characteristics.Google Scholar
  2. 21. G.B. Sweet 1964a: The establishment of provenance trials in Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) in New Zealand.Google Scholar
  3. 23. G.B. Sweet 1964b: The assessment six years after planting of a provenance trial in Douglas fir (1957 series).Google Scholar
  4. G.B. Sweet 1965: Provenance differences in Pacific coast Douglas fir. Silvae Genetica 14(2): 46–56.Google Scholar
  5. 37. M.D. Wilcox 1968: The genetic improvement of Douglas fir in New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  6. 56. G.B. Sweet and M.P. Bollman 1971: Variation in seed yields per cone in Douglas fir in New Zealand.Google Scholar
  7. 59. C.J.A. Shelbourne, J.M. Harris, J.R. Tustin and I.D. Whiteside 1973: The relationship of timber stiffness to branch and stem morphology and wood properties in plantation-grown Douglas-fir in New Zealand.Google Scholar
  8. 55/6960 M.D. Wilcox 1974: Stress grading study of Douglas-fir; effects of branch diameter and wood density on timber stiffness.Google Scholar
  9. 69. M.D. Wilcox 1974: Douglas fir provenance variation and selection in New Zealand.Google Scholar
  10. M.J.F. Lausberg, D.J. Cown, D.L. McConchie and J.H. Skipwith 1995: Variation in some wood properties of Pseudotsuga menziesii provenances grown in New Zealand. NZJFS (25):Google Scholar
  11. H. McConnon, R.L. Knowles and L.W. Hansen 2004: Provenance affects bark thickness in Douglas fir. NZJFS 34(1): 77–86.Google Scholar
  12. 103/7010 T.G. Vincent and M.D. Wilcox 1976: Height and health of seven-year-old Mexican, Californian and Kaingaroa origin Douglas-fir at Kaingaroa and Gwavas forests.Google Scholar
  13. Restarting the Douglas-fir breeding programme in 1988. (See Aus.For. later: Shelbourne, Low, Gea and Knowles 2005).Google Scholar
  14. C.B. Low and L.D. Gea 1997: Estimation of genetic parameters for growth and form traits in Douglas-fir progeny test on four sites aged 23 years.Google Scholar
  15. C.J.A. Shelbourne, C.B. Low, L.D. Gea, and R.L. Knowles 2007: Achievements in forest tree genetic improvement in Australia and New Zealand: 5: Genetic improvement of Douglas-fir in New Zealand. Aus. For. 70, 1 pp. 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. C.B. Low, N.J. Ledgard and C.J.A. Shelbourne 2012: Early growth and form of coastal provenances and progenies of Douglas-fir at three sites in New Zealand. NZJFS 42:143–160.Google Scholar
  17. C.B. Low, C.J.A. Shelbourne and D.G. Henley 2012: Effect of seed source of Douglas-fir at high-elevation New Zealand sites: performance at age eight years. NZJFS 42: 161–176.Google Scholar
  18. C.B. Low, C.J.A. Shelbourne and D.G. Henley 2012: Effect of seed source of Douglas-fir at high-elevation New Zealand sites: performance at age eight years. NZJFS 42: 161–1.Google Scholar
  19. N.J. Ledgard and M.C. Belton 1985: Exotic trees in the Canterbury high country. NZJFS 15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. J. A. Shelbourne
    • 1
  1. 1.RotoruaNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations