Advertisement

Acceptability and Use of Mobile Health Applications in Health Information Systems: A Case of eIDSR and DHIS2 Touch Mobile Applications in Tanzania

  • Jimmy T. MbelwaEmail author
  • Honest C. Kimaro
  • Bernard Mussa
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 551)

Abstract

The use of modern information and communication technology plays a significant role in healthcare services improvement. In the recent years, various mobile application systems have been deployed in the health sectors of different developing countries to facilitate remote data collection and transmission so as to improve its quality and availability. Consequently, understanding the factors contributing to mobile technology acceptance is imperative. The purpose of this study was to adopt a modified UTAUT theoretical model to understand the factors influence acceptance and use of mobile health applications by health workers at health facilities in Tanzania. Questionnaires were used to collect data from health facilities workers. Out of 150 health facilities workers, only 108 return, a 72% return rate whose data was statistically analyzed using SPSS tool. The findings show that effort expectancy and facilitating conditions significantly influence the users located in the urban area on behavioral intention to use mobile health applications. Furthermore, the study shows that the constructs such as social influence, training adequacy, and voluntariness of use do not have a significant influence on the use of mobile health applications.

Keywords

Acceptability Mobile health applications Health information systems UTAUT 

References

  1. 1.
    Kohn, L.T., Corrigan, J.M., Donaldson, M.S.: Shaping the future for health: to err is human: building a safer health system. Institute of Medicine, Washington (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ali, A.L., et al.: Experience with the Mobile4D disaster reporting and alerting system in lao PDR. In: Choudrie, J., Islam, M.S., Wahid, F., Bass, J.M., Priyatma, J.E. (eds.) ICT4D 2017. IAICT, vol. 504, pp. 525–535. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59111-7_43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    District Health Information System. https://www.dhis2.org/. Accessed Aug 2018
  4. 4.
    Khajouei, R., Jaspers, M.: The impact of CPOE medication systems’ design aspects on usability, workflow and medication orders a systematic review. Methods Inf. Med. 49(1), 3–19 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thyvalikakath, T., Monaco, V., Thambuganipalle, H.B., Schleye, T.K.: A usability evaluation of four commercial dental computer-based patient record systems. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 139(12), 1632–1642 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shah, S.G.S., Robinson, I.: Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 23(1), 131–137 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(1), 425–478 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    George, D., Mallery, P.: SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Study Guide and Reference, 17.0 Update, 10th edn. Allyn & Bacon Inc., Needham Heights (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhou, T., Lu, Y., Wang, B.: Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(4), 760–767 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pynoo, B., Devolder, P., Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Duyck, W., Duyck, P.: Predicting secondary school teachers’ acceptance and use of a digital learning environment: a cross-sectional study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(1), 568–575 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miltgen, C.L., Popovič, A., Oliveira, T.: Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics: integrating the “Big 3” of technology acceptance with privacy context. Decis. Support Syst. 56, 103–114 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oliveira, T., Faria, M., Thomas, M.A., Popovič, A.: Extending the understanding of mobile banking adoption: when UTAUT meets TTF and ITM. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 34(5), 689–703 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yoo, S.J., Han, S., Huang, W.: The roles of intrinsic motivators and extrinsic motivators in promoting e-Learning in the workplace: a case from South Korea. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(3), 942–950 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Akter, S., D’Ambra, J., Ray, P.: Service quality of mHealth platforms: development and validation of a hierarchical model using PLS. Electron. Mark. 20(3), 209–227 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sun, Y., Liu, L., Peng, X., Dong, Y., Barnes, S.J.: Understanding Chinese users’ continuance intention toward online social networks: an integrative theoretical model. Electron. Mark. 24(1), 57–66 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Biljon, J., Kotzé, P.: Cultural factors in a mobile phone adoption and usage model. j-jucs 14(16), 2650–2679 (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hoque, R., Sorwar, G.: Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: an extension of the UTAUT model. Int. J. Med. Inform. 101, 75–84 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jimmy T. Mbelwa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Honest C. Kimaro
    • 1
  • Bernard Mussa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of Dar es SalaamDar es SalaamTanzania

Personalised recommendations