Tax Misapplication: Sales and Use Taxes and Games Taxation



Virtual assets are legal subjects of taxation. It is important to rethink concepts of sales and use taxes and games taxation. The Internet challenges the way that them have been levied and collected.


Tax misapplication Sales Use tax Games Taxation 


  1. 1.
    Menhart, E. (2007). Taxing the internet: Analyzing the states’ plan to derive online sales revenue. Journal of State Taxation, 25, 23–34.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Howsare, B. (2017). The new normal for sales and use tax in the United States: Will a state challenge to supreme court precedent overhaul sales and use tax compliance for online retailers. Pittsburgh Tax Review, 14, 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    White, J. H. (2008). Safe haven no more: How online affiliate marketing programs can minimize new state sales tax liability. Shidler Journal of Law, Commerce & Technology, 5(1), 36–49.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allen, S. T. (2013). Adapting to the internet: Why legislation is needed to address the preference for online sales that deprives states of tax revenue. Tax Lawyer, 66(4), 939–960.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Swain, A. W., & Trelease, N. T. (2006). Online retailers netted by nexus: The borders online case. Intellectual Property and Technology Law, 35(1), 37–42.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wisniewski, S. (2008). Taxation of virtual assets. Duke Law & Technology Review, 7, 1.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tanzi, V. (2001). Globalization, technological developments and the work of fiscal termites. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 26, 1261–1282.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cockfield, A. J. (2002). Designing tax policy for the digital biosphere: How the internet is changing tax laws. Connecticut Law Review, 34, 333–403.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chodorow, A. S. (2010). Tracing bias through virtual spaces. Cornell Law Review, 95, 283–328.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steinberg, A. B. (2009). For sale – One level 5 barbarian for 94,800 won: The international effects of virtual property and the legality of its ownership. The Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 37, 381–420.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morgan, J. S. (2003). Dirty names, dangerous money: Alleged unilateralism in U.S. policy on money laundering. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 21, 802.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gordon, R., & Morris, A. P. (2014). Moving money international financial flows, taxes and money laundering. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 37, 1–120.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Montano, M. P. (2010). Can widening the scope of information reporting to include income derived from online sales help to narrow the expanding tax gap. Southern California Law Review, 83, 379–423.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Valeriane, E. M. (2016). IRS, will you spare some change: Defining virtual currency for the FATCA. Valparaiso University Law Review, 50, 864–911.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    OECD website. Model mandatory disclosure rules for CRS avoidance arrangements and opaque offshore structures. Retrieved September 2, 2018, from

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.3rd RegionFederal Court of AppealsSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations