Abstract
This chapter summarizes the key findings of the book and emphasizes the need to study the making of the banlieue, as constituted both ‘externally’ (by state actors) and ‘internally’ (by young people on the street corner). This book looks beyond a simple enumeration of poverty, unemployment, segregation and discrimination, and instead describes and analyses the daily lives of those who live in a neighbourhood that has been labelled as ‘problematic’ since the early 1980s. It shows how many young people struggle between hanging out on the street or staying inside; between strongly identifying with or dissociating from the neighbourhood; between seeing violence as morally wrong, as a desperate last resort to protest against structural and state violence, or as a way to gain status and respect. These young people are, above all, in search of dignity and safety, in search of a home and belonging. At the end, I explain why religion plays a limited role in this book and offer an antidote against the tendency of exclusively emplacing jihadism in the French banlieues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Diary notes 5 August 2011.
- 2.
Diary notes 13 July 2011.
- 3.
Also multiple other events, such as the shootings of French soldiers and Jewish civilians by Mohamed Merah in March 2012 in Toulouse and Montauban, the shooting and hostage taking in Carcassonne and Trèbes in March 2018, and the shooting and stabbing in Strasbourg in December 2018 contribute to the centrality of religion in the French debate.
- 4.
The state of emergency was declared in the aftermath of the November 2015 attacks and ended (after five extensions) in November 2017.
- 5.
Both used media platforms to critique the other; for example, see for Kepel’s critique on Roy in newspaper Libération here: http://www.liberation.fr/debats/2016/03/14/radicalisations-et-islamophobie-le-roi-est-nu_1439535 and for Roy’s critique on Kepel in the weekly magazine L’Obs here: https://bibliobs.nouvelobs.com/idees/20160406.OBS8018/djihadisme-olivier-roy-repond-a-gilles-kepel.html.
- 6.
Kepel refers to two other important developments in 2005 that contributed to the rise of jihadism in France. First, the publication of the Global Islamic Resistance Call—written by Abu Musab al-Suri. 1600 pages came online in 2005, and it served according to Kepel as an instruction manual for new jihadists. Second, the establishment of YouTube, which was in Kepel’s view of crucial importance in the mobilization and recruitment of young people in France.
- 7.
Diary notes 3 May 2014.
References
Cresswell, T. (1996). In Place/Out of Place: Geography, Ideology, and Transgression. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dikeç, M. (2007). Badlands of the Republic: Space, Politics, and Urban Policy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gieryn, T. (2000). A Space for Place in Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 463–496.
Kepel, G. (2017). Terror in France: The Rise of Jihad in the West. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kokoreff, M., & Lapeyronnie, D. (2013). Refaire la cité: L’avenir des banlieues. Paris: Seuil.
Lapeyronnie, D. (2008). Ghetto urbain: Ségrégation, violence, pauvreté en France aujourd’hui. Paris: Robert Laffont.
Raban, J. (2008 [1974]). Soft City. London: Picador.
Ragin, C., & Amoroso, L. (2011). Constructing Social Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
Reinders, L. (2013). Harde stad, zachte stad: Moderne architectuur en de antropologie van een naoorlogse wijk (PhD dissertation). Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft.
Roy, O. (2017). Jihad and Death: The Global Appeal of Islamic State. London: Hurst & Co.
Whyte, W. F. (1981 [1943]). Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Wieviorka, M. (1999). Violence en France. Paris: Seuil.
Wieviorka, M. (2009). Violence: A New Approach. London: Sage.
Wimmer, A. (2008). The Making and Unmaking of Ethnic Boundaries: A Multilevel Process Theory. American Journal of Sociology, 113(4), 970–1022.
Wimmer, A. (2013). Ethnic Boundary Making: Institutions, Power, Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Slooter, L. (2019). Conclusion. In: The Making of the Banlieue. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18210-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18210-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18209-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18210-6
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)