Exploring Escape Games as a Teaching Tool in Educational Robotics

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 946)


In the past years, educational escape games have raised interest in researchers and educators as a new game-based learning approach to break out from the traditional classroom routine. Recent work has demonstrated that educational escape games elicit high motivation and engagement on the part of the participants. Moreover, it has been shown that many participants experienced flow, a state of mind, which has been considered as beneficial for successful learning. However, due to its novelty, studies on the educational significance of such activities still appear to be sparse. In this work, we investigated whether escape games can be used as a teaching tool in the context of educational robotics, since both can be situated in the pedagogical currents of social-constructivism. To this end, we developed a prototype of an escape game using the educational robot Thymio and the visual programming language VPL and tested it with 61 subjects. Both quantitative and qualitative results showed that most participants highly appreciated the activity and agreed on the game’s usability for teaching. Moreover, a great majority agreed on having experienced flow while playing. We, therefore, suggest that escape games provide a favorable framework for educational robotic activities, promoting particularly self-regulated and collaborative learning.


Constructivism Educational robotics Game-based learning 


  1. 1.
    Deci, E., Vallerand, R., Pelletier, L., Ryan, R.: Motivation and education: the self-determination perspective. Educ. Psychol. 26, 325–346 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G., Blais, M.R., et al.: The academic motivation scale: a measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 52, 1003–1017 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Viau, R.: La motivation en contexte scolaire. De Boeck Supérieur (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prensky, M.: Computer games and learning: digital-based games. In: Handbook of Computer. Game Studies, pp. 97–124 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fletcher, J.D., Sigmund, T., Wind, A.P.: Game-based learning. In: Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 4th edn., pp. 485–503 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Whitton, N.: Digital Games and Learning: Research and Theory (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Steinkuehler, C., Squire, K.: Videogames and learning. In: The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 377–394 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clarke, S., Peel, D.J., Arnab, S., et al.: escapED: a framework for creating educational escape rooms and interactive games for higher/further education. Int. J. Serious Games 4, 73–86 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nicholson, S.: Peeking behind the locked door: a survey of escape room facilities. White Paper, pp. 1–35 (2015).
  10. 10.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (1978)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    King, A.: From sage on the stage to guide on the side. Coll. Teach. 41, 30–35 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Papert, S.: Situating constructionism. Constructionism 36, 1–11 (1991)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Piaget, J.: The construction of reality in the child. J. Consult. Psychol. 19, 77 (1955)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vörös, A.I.V., Sárközi, Z.: Physics escape room as an educational tool. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1916 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kinio, A., Dufresne, L., Brandys, T., Jetty, P.: Break out of the classroom: the use of escape rooms as an alternative learning strategy for surgical education. J. Vasc. Surg. 66, e76 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hou, H.-T., Chou, Y.-S.: Exploring the technology acceptance and flow state of a chamber escape game - escape the lab© for learning electromagnet concept. In: Work Poster Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2012, pp. 38–41 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shernoff, D.J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., Shernoff, E.S.: Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. Sch. Psychol. Q. 18, 158–176 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chevalier, M., Riedo, F., Mondada, F.: Pedagogical uses of Thymio II. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 23, 16–23 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boller, S., Kapp, K.M.: Play to Learn: Everything You Need to Know About Designing Effective Learning Games. ATD Press, Alexandria (2017)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shin, J., Siegwart, R., Magnenat, S.: Visual programming language for Thymio II robot. In: Conference on Interaction Design and Children (2014).
  21. 21.
    Dennehy, R.F., Sims, R.R., Collins, H.E.: Debriefing experiential learning exercises: a theoretical and practical guide for success. J. Manage. Educ. 22, 9–25 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nicholson, S.: Completing the experience: debriefing in experiential educational games. In: 3rd International Conference on Society and Information Technologies, vol. 11, pp. 117–121 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Davis, F.D., Davis, D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kiili, K.: Evaluations of an experiential gaming model. Hum. Technol. Interdisc. Hum. ICT Environ. 2, 187–201 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., Clark, R.E.: Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work. Educ. Psychol. 41, 87–98 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T.: Assessing Students in Groups, 1st edn. Corwin (2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Alimisis, D.: Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes Sci. Technol. Educ. 6, 63–71 (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pan, R., Lo, H., Neustaedter, C.: Collaboration, awareness, and communication in real-life escape rooms. In: Proceedings of 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS 2017, pp. 1353–1364 (2017)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Slavin, R.E.: Research on cooperative learning and achievement: what we know, what we need to know. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 21, 70–79 (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mobots group of the Biorobotics Laboratory, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)LausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Education and Learning (DFA)University of Applied, Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI)LocarnoSwitzerland
  3. 3.Haute École Pédagogique (HEP) du Canton de VaudLausanneSwitzerland
  4. 4.EdQuestLondonUK

Personalised recommendations