Advertisement

How to Support Girls’ Participation at Projects in Makerspace Settings. Overview on Current Recommendations

  • Sandra SchönEmail author
  • Margarethe Rosenova
  • Martin Ebner
  • Maria Grandl
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 946)

Abstract

Several biases and thresholds challenge the reach of girls in technology-related activities. For this contribution we collected and structured existing research and good practices on how to reach girls within projects in the field educational robotics, makerspaces, coding and STEM in general. The contribution presents general guidelines for future activities with a potential higher rate of participating girls in makerspace settings.

Keywords

Girls Participation maker education STEM Makerspace Robotics 

References

  1. 1.
    Legewie, J., DiPrete, T.A.: The high school environment and the gender gap in science and engineering. Sociol. Educ. 87(4), 259–280 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wittemyer, R., et al.: MakeHers: engaging girls and women in technology through making, creating, and inventing. Study by Intel Corporation (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cussó-Calabuig, R., Carrera Farran, X., Bosch-Capblanch, X.: Are boys and girls still digitally differentiated? The case of Catalonian teenagers. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res. 16, 411–435 (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sullivan, A., Bers, M.U.: Girls, boys, and bots: gender differences in young children’s performance on robotics and programming tasks. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Innov. Pract. 15, 145–165 (2016). http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3547. Accessed 15 July 2018Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    UNESCO: STEM and gender advancement (SAGA) (project homepage). https://en.unesco.org/saga. Accessed 14 July 2018
  6. 6.
    Schön, S., Jagrikova, R., Voigt, C.: Social innovations within makerspace settings for early entrepreneurial education - the DOIT project. In: Proceedings of the EdMedia Conference, Amsterdam, 25–29 June 2018, pp. 1716–1725. (2018). http://www.learntechlib.org/primary/j/EDMEDIA/v/2018/n/1/. Accessed 15 July 2018
  7. 7.
    Hyun, T.: Middle school girls: perceptions and experiences with robotics. ProQuest LLC, Ed.D. dissertation, California State University, Fullerton (2014). https://search.proquest.com/docview/1553689179. Accessed 15 July 2018
  8. 8.
    Macdonald, A.: Gender action guidelines. Inventory of considerations that must be taken into account during the development of a workshop for Fab Labs. Phalabs 4.0 - PHotonics enhanced fAB LABS supporting the next revolution in digitalization (2018). http://www.phablabs.eu/. Accessed 15 July 2018
  9. 9.
    Tan, E., Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., O’Neill, T.: Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: how middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 50(10), 1143–1179 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kekelis, L., Ryoo, J., McLeod, E.: Making and mentors: what it takes to make them better together. Afterschool Matters 26, 8–17 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schön, S., Ebner, M., Reip, I.: Kreative digitale Arbeit mit Kindern in einer viertägigen offenen Werkstatt. Medienimpulse, no. 1 (2016). https://www.medienimpulse.at/articles/view/829. Accessed 15 July 2018
  12. 12.
    Gappmaier, L.: MakerDays for kids – analyse und Konzepterstellung. In: Ebner, M., Schön, S. (eds.) iTUG, vol. 8. Book On Demand. Norderstedt (2018). https://itug.eu. Accessed 23 July 2018
  13. 13.
    Kuhar, R., Zobec, A.: The anti-gender movement in Europe and the educational process in public schools. CEPS J. 7(2), 29–46 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gomoll, A., Hmelo-Silver, C., Šabanović, S., Francisco, M.: Dragons, ladybugs, and softballs: girls’ STEM engagement with human-centered robotics. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 25(6), 899–914 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schön, S., Ebner, M., Kumar, S.: The maker movement. Implications of new digital gadgets, fabrication tools and spaces for creative learning and teaching. In: eLearning Papers, vol. 39, pp. 14–25 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Schön
    • 1
    Email author
  • Margarethe Rosenova
    • 1
  • Martin Ebner
    • 2
  • Maria Grandl
    • 2
  1. 1.Salzburg Research ForschungsgesellschaftSalzburgAustria
  2. 2.Graz University of TechnologyGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations