Advertisement

Migration and the European Welfare State in a Changing World Order

  • Johan E. EklundEmail author
  • Pontus Braunerhjelm
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter asks how migration might affect the economies of European welfare states. The welfare state is put in the perspective of the refugee crisis that Europe has experienced since 2015. The chapter explores the economic costs and benefits that migration can generate against the background of comprehensive welfare ambitions and economic redistribution in many European countries. Large-scale asylum-based immigration often entails economic costs for the recipient country, at least initially, but the authors also show that immigrants often contribute to economic development through innovation and new networks. Here, the authors emphasize that an effective integration policy is critical to national economic performance, as well as the future scope and design of welfare policies. One of the main issues brought up in the chapter is whether the most expansive welfare states in Europe will be able to maintain their universal nature or whether welfare entitlements must somehow be differentiated. Consequently, there is substantial policy scope to shape the ultimate outcome of higher immigration.

References

  1. Aldén, M., & Hammarstedt, L. (2016). Flyktinginvandring: Sysselsättning, förvärvsinkomster och offentliga finanser. Rapport till Finanspolitiska rådet. 2016: 1.Google Scholar
  2. Borjas, G. J. (1999). Immigration and Welfare Magnets. Journal of Labor Economics, 17(4), 607–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borjas, G. J. (2013). Immigration and the American Worker. Center for Immigration Studies.Google Scholar
  4. Brezis, E. S., & Krugman, P. R. (1996). Immigration, Investment, and Real Wages. Journal of Population Economics, 9(1), 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chatham House. (2017). What Do Europeans Think About Muslim Immigration? Retrieved October 2, 2018, from https://www.chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/what-do-europeans-think-about-muslim-immigration#.
  6. Ekberg, J. (2009). Invandringen och de offentliga finanserna. Expertgruppen för studier i offentlig ekonomi. 2009: 3.Google Scholar
  7. Eklund, J. (Ed.). (2016). Immigration, Economic Integration and Entrepreneurship. Swedish Economic Forum Report 2016. Swedish Entrepreneurship Forum.Google Scholar
  8. Foged, M., & Peri, G. (2016). Immigrants’ Effect on Native Workers: New Analysis on Longitudinal Data. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(2), 1–34.Google Scholar
  9. Hatzigeorgiou, A., & Lodefalk, M. (2015). Trade, Migration and Integration: Evidence and Policy Implications. The World Economy, 38(12), 2013–2048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kancs, A., & Lecca, P. (2017). Long Term Social, Economic and Fiscal Effects of Immigration into the EU: The Role of Integration Policy. Joint Research Centre Working Papers in Economics and Finance. 2017: 4.Google Scholar
  11. Kerr, W. R., & Lincoln, W. L. (2010). The Supply Side of Innovation: H-1B Visa Reforms and US Ethnic Invention. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(3), 473–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Krugman, P. R. (2010, April 26). The Curious Politics of Immigration. The New York Times. Retrieved October 2, 2018, from https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/26/the-curious-politics-of-immigration/.
  13. Lazear, E. P. (2017). Why Are Some Immigrant Groups More Successful Than Others?. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper. 2017: 23548.Google Scholar
  14. NOS. (2016). Timmermans: meer dan helft vluchtelingen heeft economisch motief. Retrieved October 2, 2018, from https://nos.nl/artikel/2082786-timmermans-meer-dan-helft-vluchtelingen-heeft-economisch-motief.html.
  15. OECD. (2010). Open for Business: Migrant Entrepreneurship in OECD Countries. OECD Publishing. Retrieved October 2, 2018, from  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264095830-en.
  16. OECD. (2018). National Accounts of OECD Countries: General Government Accounts 2017. OECD Publishing. Retrieved October 2, 2018, from  https://doi.org/10.1787/na_gga-2018-en.
  17. Peri, G., & Sparber, C. (2009). Task Specialization, Immigration, and Wages. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(3), 135–169.Google Scholar
  18. Ruist, J. (2018). The Prosperity Gap and the Free Movement of Workers. In U. Bernitz, M. Mårtensson, L. Oxelheim, & T. Persson (Eds.), Bridging the Prosperity Gap in the EU: The Social Challenge Ahead. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Sanandaji, T. (2016). Massutmaningen. Kuhzad Media.Google Scholar
  20. Wihlborg, C., & Khoury, S. (2018). Trust in the Euro and the EU’s Banking Union after the Financial Crisis. In A. Bakardijeva Engelbrekt, N. Bremberg, A. Michalski, & L. Oxelheim (Eds.), Trust in the European Union in Challenging Times. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Blekinge Institute of TechnologyKarlskronaSweden
  2. 2.Swedish Entrepreneurship ForumStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Swedish Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations