EU Climate Policy in a Changing World Order

  • Sverker C. Jagers
  • Frida Nilsson
  • Thomas SternerEmail author


EU climate change policy is pursued in a new international context as EU Member States are about to implement the Paris Agreement. The authors of this chapter argue that the EU presented a strong, united front in the process leading up to the Paris Agreement, but there are clear differences in terms of both ambition and approach in the actual climate change policies of EU member states, which are due to variation in political culture, values, and political institutions. With this in mind, the chapter considers the EU’s role as an actor in climate change policy with regard to its historical role, current position, and future status. The authors begin by examining Europe’s early industrialization, which led to an increase in both economic power and the level of emissions of greenhouse gases. Relying on a variety of statistics, the authors determine that Europe’s position looks very different today, and they emphasize that even though the EU maintains a united front in climate negotiations, climate policy differs widely among EU member states.


  1. Agell, J., Englund, P., & Södersten, J. (1996). Tax Reform of the Century: The Swedish Experiment. National Tax Journal, 49(4), 643–664.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, R. C. (2009). The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelier, J. P., & Sterner, T. (1990). Tax Harmonization for Petroleum Products in the EC. Energy Policy, 18(6), 500–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bäckstrand, K., & Elgström, O. (2013). The EU’s Role in Climate Change Negotiations: From Leader to ‘Leadiator’. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(10), 1369–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlsson, F., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2012). Behavioral Economics and Environmental Policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics., 4, 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunlap, R. E., & York, R. (2008). The Globalization of Environmental Concern and the Limits of the Postmaterialist Values Explanation: Evidence from Four Multinational Surveys. The Sociological Quarterly, 49, 529–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. (2017). Finance Law 2018 and Second Rectifying Finance Law for 2017. Retrieved July 17, 2018, from
  8. Gupta, J. (2010). A History of International Climate Change Policy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1, 636–653.Google Scholar
  9. Hammar, H., & Jagers, S. C. (2007). What Is a Fair CO2 Tax Increase? On Fair Emission Reductions in the Transport Sector. Ecological Economics, 61(2–3), 377–387.Google Scholar
  10. Hammar, H., Löfgren, Å., & Sterner, T. (2004). Political Economy Obstacles to Fuel Taxation. The Energy Journal, 25(3), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harring, N. (2014). The Multiple Dilemmas of Environmental Protection: The Effects of Generalized and Political Trust on the Acceptance of Environmental Policy Instruments. Dissertation. Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
  12. Jagers, S. (2008). Människors oro – ett medel för radikal klimatpolitik? In P. Cramér, S. Gustavsson, & L. Oxelheim (Eds.), Europaperspektiv 2008: EU och den globala klimatfrågan. Stockholm: Santérus förlag.Google Scholar
  13. Jagers, S. C., & Matti, S. (2018). Climate Policy Support in a Comparative Perspective: Exploring the Meaning and Significance of Political-Economic Contexts. Environmental Politics (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
  14. Jagers, S. C., & Robertson, F. (2018). The Role of Trust in Large-Scale Collective Action. Journal of Social Medicine (forthcoming, in Swedish).Google Scholar
  15. Kallbekken, S., & Saelen, H. (2011). Public Acceptance for Environmental Taxes: Self-interest, Environmental and Distributional Concerns. Energy Policy, 39, 2966–2973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kirk, E. A., Reeves, A. D., & Blackstock, K. L. (2007). Path Dependency and the Implementation of Environmental Regulation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 25(2), 250–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Matti, S. (2015). Climate Policy Instruments. In K. Bäckstrand & E. Lövbrand (Eds.), Research Handbook of Climate Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Povitkina, M. (2018). The Limits of Democracy in Tackling Climate Change. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Quitzow, L., Canzler, W., Grundmann, P., Leibenath, M., Moss, T., & Tilmann, R. (2016). The German Energiewende – What’s Happening? Introducing the Special Issue. Utilities Policy, 41, 163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2013). The Role of Emotion in Global Warming Policy Support and Opposition. Risk Analysis, 34(5), 937–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Somanathan, E., Sterner, T., Sugiyama, T., Chimanikire, D., Essandoh-Yeddu, J., Fifita, S., Goulder, L., Jaffe, A., Labandeira, X., Managi, S., Mitchell, C., Montero, J. P., Steg, F., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors Influencing the Acceptability of Energy Policies: A Test of VBN Theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 415–425.Google Scholar
  23. Sterner, T. (1994). Environmental Tax Reform: The Swedish Experience. European Environment, 4(6), 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sterner, T. (2007). Fuel Taxes: An Important Instrument for Climate Policy. Energy Policy, 35(6), 3194–3202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tjernström, E., & Tietenberg, T. (2008). Do Differences in Attitudes Explain Differences in National Climate Change Policies? Ecological Economics, 65(2), 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sverker C. Jagers
    • 1
  • Frida Nilsson
    • 1
  • Thomas Sterner
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations