Skip to main content

Comparison of Specific Fractal and Multifractal Parameters for Certain Regions of Interest from Digital Mammograms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
CMBEBIH 2019 (CMBEBIH 2019)

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 73))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2238 Accesses

Abstract

Fractal analysis of grey-scale digital image is a recognized tool for detection of irregularities in the image and as measure of complexity of the image. Basic idea of this paper is to explore relation of fractal dimensions and some other related parameters in the chosen regions of interest (ROI) of grey-scale digital medical image with corresponding specific tissue characteristics. If difference of the values for calculated parameters is proven to be statistically significant for ROI of mammograms with different specific characteristics, this kind of analysis can be helpful for computer aided diagnostics. Especially, possibility of automatic detection of microcalcifications is considered. Analysis of mammograms in this manner is not a simple task, as there are four different types of parenchym tissue, there are five grades for microcalcifications according to their malignity (BI-RADS), and there are several different types of microcalcifications. Results of fractal and multifractal analysis of 131 ROIs (150 × 150 pixels) from 60 different mammograms are presented in this paper. Out of total 131, 60 ROIs encloses normal tissue (without dense masses or microcalcifications), and remaining 71 ROIs encloses tissue with microcalcifications. Out of total 60 mammograms concerning parenchym tissue type, 17 mammograms is for ACR 1 structure, 21 ACR 2, i 22 ACR 3 structure. Fractal parameter that is considered is Hurst coefficient, and it is considered how it changes with size of ROI. \( {\text{H}}{\ddot{{\text{o}}}}{\text{lder}} \) exponent and multifractal spectra for each ROI is calculated, and corresponding histograms are analyzed. Values of suitable parameters from these histograms are tabulated to check their statistical dependance on ACR and BI-RADS grades. Zero hypothesis that there is no difference between normal ROI and ROI with microcalcifications is tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. IARC: Breast cancer estimated incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012

    Google Scholar 

  2. IARC: Breast cancer estimated incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2018

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sickles, E.A., D’Orsi, C.J., Bassett, L.W., et al.: ACR BI-RADS® Mammography. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nelson, H.D., O’Meara, E.S., Kerlikowske, K. Balch, S., Miglioretti, D.: Factors associated with rates of false-positive and false-negative results from digital mammography screening: an analysis of registry data. Ann Intern Med. 164(4), 226–235 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thiele, D.L., Kimme-Smith, C., Johnson, T.D., McCombs, M., Bassett, L.W.: Using tissue texture surrounding calcification clusters to predict benign versus malignant outcomes. Med. Phys. 23(4), 549–555 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mandelbrot, B.B.: The Fractal Geometry of Nature. WH Freeman, Oxford (1983)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Pentland, A.: Fractal-based description of natural scenes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 6(6), 661–674 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lopez, R., Betrouni, N.: Fractal and multifractal analysis: a review. Med. Image Anal. 13, 634–649 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Costa, A.F., Humpire-Mamani G., Traina A.J.M.: An efficient algorithm for fractal analysis of textures. In: Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI) Conference, pp. 39–46 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Busuladžić .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Đedović, E., Gazibegović–Busuladžić, A., Busuladžić, M., Beganović, A. (2020). Comparison of Specific Fractal and Multifractal Parameters for Certain Regions of Interest from Digital Mammograms. In: Badnjevic, A., Škrbić, R., Gurbeta Pokvić, L. (eds) CMBEBIH 2019. CMBEBIH 2019. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 73. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17971-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17971-7_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17970-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17971-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics