Advertisement

IUD Counseling: What’s Choice Got to Do With It?

  • Aisha MaysEmail author
Chapter
  • 157 Downloads

Abstract

Current best practices in contraceptive counseling reflect reproductive justice principles that access to reproductive health care is a human right—that individuals should have autonomous choice of when, and if, they choose to parent; irrespective of age, socioeconomic status, gender identity, or social vulnerabilities. Adopting counseling techniques for adolescents and young adults that avoid all forms of reproductive coercion, and promote ultimate patient choice ensures that providers follow these tenets. This chapter will describe best-practice models for providing contraceptive counseling, and include methods for integrating these counseling models into IUD placement, continuation, and removal for adolescents and young adults. Common models of contraceptive counseling will be discussed, with a focus on the shared decision-making model and how to use this with counseling for IUDs. The history of reproductive coercion and abuse will also be reviewed, in the context and framing of this chapter.

Keywords

Adolescent Young adult IUD Shared decision-making Contraceptive counseling Reproductive coercion Reproductive justice Copper IUD Levonorgestrel IUD 

Abbreviations

AAP

American Academy of Pediatrics

ACOG

The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology

HEADSS

Home, Education/Employment, Activities, Drugs/Depression, Suicidality, Sex

LARC

Long-acting reversible contraception

RJ

Reproductive justice

SAHM

Society of Adolescent Health and Medicine

SDM

Shared decision-making

References

  1. 1.
    Hillard PJA. What is LARC? And why does it matter for adolescents and young adults? J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:S1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice, Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group. ACOG Committee Opinion no. 450: increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:1434–8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ott MA, Sucato GS. Committee on adolescence. Contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics. 2014;134:e1257–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dehlendorf C, Rodriguez MI, Levy K, Borrero S, Steinauer J. Disparities in family planning. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:214–20.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roberts D. Killing the black body: race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. New York: Vintage Books; 2014.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Christopherson S. NWHN-SisterSong joint statement of principles on LARCs – NWHN. In: NWHN [Internet]. 14 Nov 2016 [cited 9 Jan 2019]. Available: https://www.nwhn.org/nwhn-joins-statement-principles-larcs/.
  7. 7.
    Gomez AM, Fuentes L, Allina A. Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46:171–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gubrium AC, Mann ES, Borrero S, Dehlendorf C, Fields J, Geronimus AT, et al. Realizing reproductive health equity needs more than Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC). Am J Public Health. 2016;106:18–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Improving knowledge about, access to, and utilization of long-acting reversible contraception among adolescents and young adults. J Adolesc Health. 2017;60:472–4.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ACOG Committee Opinion No. 735. Adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:e130–9.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ross L, Solinger R. Reproductive justice: an Introduction. Oakland: University of California Press; 2017.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gilliam ML, Neustadt A, Gordon R. A call to incorporate a reproductive justice agenda into reproductive health clinical practice and policy. Contraception. 2009;79:243–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Higgins JA, Hirsch JS. Pleasure, power, and inequality: incorporating sexuality into research on contraceptive use. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:1803–13.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Templeton M, Lohan M, Kelly C, Lundy L. A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of adolescents’ views of sexual readiness. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73:1288–301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rights, respect, responsibility: don’t have sex without them a lesson plan from rights, respect, responsibility: A K-12 curriculum [Internet]. [cited 18 Jan 2019]. Available: https://advocatesforyouth.org/wp-content/uploads/3rscurric/documents/10-Lesson-1-3Rs-RightsRespectResponsibility.pdf.
  16. 16.
    Hanging out or hooking up: a train the trainers curriculum on responding to adolescent relationship abuse – futures without violence. In: Futures without violence [Internet]. 2 Feb 2015 [cited 18 Jan 2019]. Available: https://www.futureswithoutviolence.org/hanging-hooking-train-trainers-curriculum-responding-adolescent-relationship-abuse/.
  17. 17.
    Yee L, Simon M. The role of the social network in contraceptive decision-making among young, African American and Latina women. J Adolesc Health. 2010;47:374–80.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dehlendorf C, Levy K, Kelley A, Grumbach K, Steinauer J. Women’s preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making. Contraception. 2013;88:250–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harper CC, Brown BA, Foster-Rosales A, Raine TR. Hormonal contraceptive method choice among young, low-income women: how important is the provider? Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81:349–54.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bitzer J, Cupanik V, Fait T, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Grob P, Oddens BJ, et al. Factors influencing women’s selection of combined hormonal contraceptive methods after counselling in 11 countries: results from a subanalysis of the CHOICE study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2013;18:372–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gold RB. Guarding against coercion while ensuring access: a delicate balance. Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2014;17:8–14.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Geronimus AT. Damned if you do: culture, identity, privilege, and teenage childbearing in the United States. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:881–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Collins PH. From black power to hip hop: racism, nationalism, and feminism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Burrell DE. The Norplant solution: Norplant and the control of African-American motherhood. UCLA Womens Law J. 1995;5. Available: https://cloudfront.escholarship.org/dist/prd/content/qt9861n279/qt9861n279.pdf?t=mlr84z.
  25. 25.
    Walker KM. Judicial control of reproductive freedom: the use of Norplant as a condition of probation. Iowa L Rev. 1993;78:779.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Borrero S, Schwarz EB, Creinin M, Ibrahim S. The impact of race and ethnicity on receipt of family planning services in the United States. J Women’s Health. 2009;18:91–6.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Downing RA, LaVeist TA, Bullock HE. Intersections of ethnicity and social class in provider advice regarding reproductive health. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:1803–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Spain JE, Peipert JF, Madden T, Allsworth JE, Secura GM. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: recruiting women at highest risk for unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection. J Women’s Health. 2010;19:2233–8.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dehlendorf C, Ruskin R, Grumbach K, Vittinghoff E, Bibbins-Domingo K, Schillinger D, et al. Recommendations for intrauterine contraception: a randomized trial of the effects of patients’ race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:319.e1–8.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wyatt KD, Anderson RT, Creedon D, Montori VM, Bachman J, Erwin P, et al. Women’s values in contraceptive choice: a systematic review of relevant attributes included in decision aids. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-28.
  31. 31.
    Brown MK, Auerswald C, Eyre SL, Deardorff J, Dehlendorf C. Identifying counseling needs of nulliparous adolescent intrauterine contraceptive users: a qualitative approach. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:293–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Raidoo S, Kaneshiro B. Contraception counseling for adolescents. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;29:310–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Upadhyay UD. Informed choice in family planning. Helping people decide. Popul Rep J. 2001:1–39.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim YM, Kols A, Mucheke S. Informed choice and decision-making in family planning counseling in Kenya. Int Fam Plann Persp. 1998;24:4–11, 42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nathanson CA, Becker MH. The influence of client-provider relationships on teenage women’s subsequent use of contraception. Am J Public Health. 1985;75:33–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Verme CS, Harper PB, Misra G, Neamatalla GS. Family planning counseling: an evolving process. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 1993;19:67.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stanback J, Steiner M, Dorflinger L, Solo J, Jr Cates W. WHO tiered-effectiveness counseling is rights-based family planning. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015;3:352–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stevens J, Lutz R, Osuagwu N, Rotz D, Goesling B. A randomized trial of motivational interviewing and facilitated contraceptive access to prevent rapid repeat pregnancy among adolescent mothers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:423.e1–9.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    DiClemente CC, Corno CM, Graydon MM, Wiprovnick AE, Knoblach DJ. Motivational interviewing, enhancement, and brief interventions over the last decade: a review of reviews of efficacy and effectiveness. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017;31:862–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Moskowitz E, Jennings B. Directive counseling on long-acting contraception. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:787–90.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dehlendorf C. Contraceptive counseling and LARC uptake. October 2014 [slides].Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60:301–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chen M, Lindley A, Kimport K, Dehlendorf C. An in-depth analysis of the use of shared decision making in contraceptive counseling. Contraception. 2018;  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.11.009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Abdel-Tawab N, Roter D. The relevance of client-centered communication to family planning settings in developing countries: lessons from the Egyptian experience. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:1357–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Melo J, Peters M, Teal S, Guiahi M. Adolescent and young women’s contraceptive decision-making processes: choosing “The Best Method for Her”. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015;28:224–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Curtis KM, Tepper NK, Jatlaoui TC, Berry-Bibee E, Horton LG, Zapata LB, et al. U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65:1–103.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rubin SE, Felsher M, Korich F, Jacobs AM. Urban adolescents’ and young adults’ decision-making process around selection of intrauterine contraception. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016;29:234–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jackson AV, Karasek D, Dehlendorf C, Foster DG. Racial and ethnic differences in women’s preferences for features of contraceptive methods. Contraception. 2016;93:406–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schmidt EO, James A, Curran KM, Peipert JF, Madden T. Adolescent experiences with intrauterine devices: a qualitative study. J Adolesc Health. 2015;57:381–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gomez AM, Clark JB. The relationship between contraceptive features preferred by young women and interest in IUDs: an exploratory analysis. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46:157–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Contraceptive use in the United States. In: Guttmacher Institute [Internet]. 4 Aug 2004 [cited 19 Jan 2019]. Available: https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/contraceptive-use-united-states.
  53. 53.
    Pratt M, Searles GE. Using visual aids to enhance physician-patient discussions and increase health literacy. J Cutan Med Surg. 2017;21:497–501.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    UCSF School of Medicine Bixby Center and Bedsider.org. How well does birth control work? [Internet]. [cited 19 Jan 2019]. Available: https://beyondthepill.ucsf.edu/sites/beyondthepill.ucsf.edu/files/Tiers_Chart_ENGLISH.pdf.
  55. 55.
    Fleming KL, Sokoloff A, Raine TR. Attitudes and beliefs about the intrauterine device among teenagers and young women. Contraception. 2010;82:178–82.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Potter J, Rubin SE, Sherman P. Fear of intrauterine contraception among adolescents in New York City. Contraception. 2014;89:446–50.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Whitaker AK, Johnson LM, Harwood B, Chiappetta L, Creinin MD, Gold MA. Adolescent and young adult women’s knowledge of and attitudes toward the intrauterine device. Contraception. 2008;78:211–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UC Berkeley School of Public Health, UC Berkeley/UCSF Joint Medical ProgramBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations