Advertisement

Making Your Office Accessible for Adolescent and Young Adult IUD Services

  • Suzan Goodman
  • Lela R. Bachrach
Chapter
  • 157 Downloads

Abstract

Many of the barriers that adolescents and young adults face in accessing health services are unique to young people, due to their stage in life, associated needs, perceptions, and abilities. Adolescent-friendly services are those effectively able to attract young people, responsively meet patient needs, and continue serving those needs through ongoing care. This chapter discusses key obstacles faced by adolescents and young adults with accessing reproductive health services, including important elements of adolescent-friendly health service provision and patient-centered contraceptive care. It also includes best practices and real-world examples for successful integration of adolescent-friendly same-day IUD provision for both emergency and ongoing contraception.

Keywords

Adolescent Young adult Adolescent clinic Adolescent-friendly Confidentiality Contraceptive access Copper IUD Levonorgestrel IUD Gender IUD as emergency contraception LGBTQIA 

Abbreviations

AYA

Adolescent and young adult

EC

Emergency contraception

EHR

Electronic health records

IUD

Intrauterine device

LARC

Long-acting reversible contraception

LGBTQIA

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, intersex, asexual, agender or allied

STI

Sexually transmitted infection

References

  1. 1.
    Harris SK, Aalsma MC, Weitzman ER, Garcia-Huidobro D, Wong C, Hadland SE, et al. Research on clinical preventive services for adolescents and young adults: where are we and where do we need to go? J Adolesc Health. 2017;60:249–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brittain AW, Williams JR, Zapata LB, Pazol K, Romero LM, Weik TS. Youth-friendly family planning services for young people: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49:S73–84.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine, Gray SH, Pasternak RH, Gooding HC, Woodward K, Hawkins K, et al. Recommendations for electronic health record use for delivery of adolescent health care. J Adolesc Health. 2014;54:487–90.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Teal SB, Elizabeth Romer S. Awareness of long-acting reversible contraception among teens and young adults. J Adolesc Health Care. 2013;52:S35–9.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kavanaugh ML, Jerman J, Ethier K, Moskosky S. Meeting the contraceptive needs of teens and young adults: youth-friendly and long-acting reversible contraceptive services in U.S. family planning facilities. J Adolesc Health Care. 2013;52:284–92.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moriarty Daley A, Sadler LS, Dawn Reynolds H. Tailoring clinical services to address the unique needs of adolescents from the pregnancy test to parenthood. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2013;43:71–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Best practices for youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health services in schools – advocates for youth. In: Advocates for Youth [Internet]. [cited 28 Nov 2018]. Available: https://advocatesforyouth.org/resources/health-information/bp-youth-friendly-services/.
  8. 8.
    Medical education – Physicians for reproductive health [Internet]. [cited 28 Nov 2018]. Available: https://prh.org/medical-education/.
  9. 9.
    Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine, Burke PJ, Coles MS, Di Meglio G, Gibson EJ, Handschin SM, et al. Sexual and reproductive health care: a position paper of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. J Adolesc Health. 2014;54:491–6.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Improving knowledge about, access to, and utilization of long-acting reversible contraception among adolescents and young adults. J Adolesc Health Care. 2017;60:472–4.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ACOG Committee Opinion No. 735. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:e130–e139.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    World Health Organization, UNAIDS. Global standards for quality health-care services for adolescents: a guide to implement a standards-driven approach to improve the quality of health care services for adolescents. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shafii T, Serrano J. Adolescent-friendly services key criteria and assessment tool. Adapted from 2009 WHO quality assessment guidebook [Internet]. [cited 28 Nov 2018]. Available: http://www.k12.wa.us/HIVSexualhealth/pubdocs/AdolescentFriendlyServices_OSPI.pdf.
  14. 14.
    Yonker LM, Zan S, Scirica CV, Jethwani K, Bernard Kinane T. “Friending” teens: systematic review of social media in adolescent and young adult health care. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zipkin DA, Umscheid CA, Keating NL, Allen E, Aung K, Beyth R, et al. Evidence-based risk communication: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:270–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garcia-Retamero R, Cokely ET. Designing visual aids that promote risk literacy: a systematic review of health research and evidence-based design heuristics. Hum Factors. 2017;59:582–627.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Drawing a picture: adolescent centered medical homes [Internet]. 2015. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAu5ad827I8.
  18. 18.
    ARSHEP presentations & case videos – Physicians for reproductive health [Internet]. [cited 28 Nov 2018]. Available: https://prh.org/arshep-ppts/#best-practices.
  19. 19.
    Ford CA, Millstein SG, Halpern-Felsher BL, Irwin CE Jr. Influence of physician confidentiality assurances on adolescents’ willingness to disclose information and seek future health care. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997;278:1029–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brittain AW, Briceno ACL, Pazol K, Zapata LB, Decker E, Rollison JM, et al. Youth-friendly family planning services for young people: a systematic review update. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55:725–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fuentes L, Ingerick M, Jones R, Lindberg L. Adolescents’ and young adults’ reports of barriers to confidential health care and receipt of contraceptive services. J Adolesc Health. 2018;62:36–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jones RK, Boonstra H. Confidential reproductive health services for minors: the potential impact of mandated parental involvement for contraception. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004;36:182–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    An overview of minors’ consent law. In: Guttmacher Institute [Internet]. 14 Mar 2016 [cited 28 Nov 2018]. Available: https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-minors-consent-law.
  24. 24.
    Bayer R, Santelli J, Klitzman R. New challenges for electronic health records: confidentiality and access to sensitive health information about parents and adolescents. JAMA. 2015;313:29–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    American Academy of Pediatrics. Confidentiality protections for adolescents and young adults in the health care billing and insurance claims process. Pediatrics. 2016;137:e20160593.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Anoshiravani A, Gaskin GL, Groshek MR, Kuelbs C, Longhurst CA. Special requirements for electronic medical records in adolescent medicine. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51:409–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Keep It Confidential. | My Health My Info [Internet]. [cited 28 Nov 2018]. Available: https://myhealthmyinfo.org/.
  28. 28.
    Hall WJ, Chapman MV, Lee KM, Merino YM, Thomas TW, Payne BK, et al. Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:e60–76.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    How to reduce implicit bias [Internet]. [cited 28 Nov 2018]. Available: http://www.ihi.org/communities/blogs/how-to-reduce-implicit-bias.
  30. 30.
    Young Women United – Young Women United – Albuquerque, NM – By and For Young Women of Color [Internet]. [cited 28 Nov 2018]. Available: https://youngwomenunited.org/.
  31. 31.
    Ambresin A-E, Bennett K, Patton GC, Sanci LA, Sawyer SM. Assessment of youth-friendly health care: a systematic review of indicators drawn from young people’s perspectives. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:670–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dean MA, Victor E, Guidry-Grimes L. Inhospitable healthcare spaces: why diversity training on LGBTQIA issues is not enough. J Bioeth Inq. 2016;13:557–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nadal KL, Whitman CN, Davis LS, Erazo T, Davidoff KC. Microaggressions toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and genderqueer people: a review of the literature. J Sex Res. 2016;53:488–508.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Blunt-Vinti HD, Thompson EL, Griner SB. Contraceptive use effectiveness and pregnancy prevention information preferences among heterosexual and sexual minority college women. Womens Health Issues. 2018;28:342–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Light AD, Obedin-Maliver J, Sevelius JM, Kerns JL. Transgender men who experienced pregnancy after female-to-male gender transitioning. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124:1120–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Richards C, Seal L. Trans people’s reproductive options and outcomes. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2014;40:245–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Guidelines for the primary and gender-affirming care of transgender and gender nonbinary people [Internet]. [cited 28 Nov 2018]. Available: http://transhealth.ucsf.edu/protocols.
  38. 38.
    Birth control access the gender spectrum. In: Reproductive health access project [Internet]. Aug 2018 [cited 28 Nov 2018]. Available: https://www.reproductiveaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/bc-across-gender-spectrum.pdf.
  39. 39.
    Biggs MA, Kaller S, Harper CC, Freedman L, Mays AR. “Birth control can easily take a back seat”: challenges providing IUDs in community health care settings. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018;29:228–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Thompson KMJ, Rocca CH, Stern L, Morfesis J, Goodman S, Steinauer J, et al. Training contraceptive providers to offer intrauterine devices and implants in contraceptive care: a cluster randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:597.e1–7.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kohn JE, Nucatola DL. EC4U: results from a pilot project integrating the copper IUC into emergency contraceptive care. Contraception. 2016;94:48–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Eisenberg D, McNicholas C, Peipert JF. Cost as a barrier to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use in adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:S59–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    LARC quick coding guide. In: ACOG [Internet]. [cited 28 Nov 2018]. Available: https://www.acog.org/-/media/Departments/LARC/Coding-Guide-2018FINAL.pdf.
  44. 44.
    Gomez AM, Fuentes L, Allina A. Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46:171–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Higgins JA. Celebration meets caution: LARC’s boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach. Contraception. 2014;89:237–41.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gubrium AC, Mann ES, Borrero S, Dehlendorf C, Fields J, Geronimus AT, et al. Realizing reproductive health equity needs more than long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Am J Public Health. 2016;106:18–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dehlendorf C, Anderson N, Vittinghoff E, Grumbach K, Levy K, Steinauer J. Quality and content of patient-provider communication about contraception: differences by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Womens Health Issues. 2017;27:530–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dehlendorf C, Henderson JT, Vittinghoff E, Steinauer J, Hessler D. Development of a patient-reported measure of the interpersonal quality of family planning care. Contraception. 2018;97:34–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Dehlendorf C, Krajewski C, Borrero S. Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57:659–73.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jaccard J, Levitz N. Counseling adolescents about contraception: towards the development of an evidence-based protocol for contraceptive counselors. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:S6–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Callegari LS, Aiken ARA, Dehlendorf C, Cason P, Borrero S. Addressing potential pitfalls of reproductive life planning with patient-centered counseling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:129–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tomescu O, Ginsburg KR. Interviewing the adolescent: strategies that promote communication and foster resilience. In: Obgyn key [Internet]. 13 Jun 2016 [cited 28 Nov 2018]. Available: https://obgynkey.com/interviewing-the-adolescent-strategies-that-promote-communication-and-foster-resilience/.
  53. 53.
    Committee on Adolescent Health Care. Committee Opinion No. 710: counseling adolescents about contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:e74–80.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change. New York: Guilford Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    HEEADSSS 3.0: The psychosocial interview for adolescents updated for a new century fueled by media. In: Contemporary pediatrics [Internet]. [cited 28 Nov 2018]. Available: http://www.contemporarypediatrics.com/article/heeadsss-30-psychosocial-interview-adolescents-updated-new-century-fueled-media.
  56. 56.
    Grace KT, Anderson JC. Reproductive coercion: a systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2018;19:371–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Committee on Adolescent Health Care. Committee Opinion No 699: adolescent pregnancy, contraception, and sexual activity. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e142–9.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Marcell AV, Halpern-Felsher BL. Adolescents’ beliefs about preferred resources for help vary depending on the health issue. J Adolesc Health. 2007;41:61–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Alexander SC, Fortenberry JD, Pollak KI, Bravender T, Davis JK, Ostbye T, et al. Sexuality talk during adolescent health maintenance visits. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168:163–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Harper CC, Rocca CH, Thompson KM, Morfesis J, Goodman S, Darney PD, et al. Reductions in pregnancy rates in the USA with long-acting reversible contraception: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2015;386:562–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Mays A, Harper C, Freeman L, Biggs MA. The role of proctoring to increase LARC access in Community Health Centers. 2016 American Public Health Conference; 2016.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Summary chart of U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. In: CDC [Internet]. 2016 [cited 28 Nov 2018]. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/unintendedpregnancy/pdf/legal_summary-chart_english_final_tag508.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suzan Goodman
    • 1
  • Lela R. Bachrach
    • 2
  1. 1.Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Family and Community MedicineUCSFSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Adolescent MedicineUCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital OaklandOaklandUSA

Personalised recommendations