Skip to main content

Standardization of the Shape of Ground Control Point (GCP) and the Methodology for Its Detection in Images for UAV-Based Mapping Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computer Vision (CVC 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 943))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The challenge of georeferencing aerial images for an accurate object to image correspondence has gained significance over the past couple of years. There is an ever-increasing need to establish accurate georeferencing techniques for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for tasks like aerial surveyance of mines/construction sites, change detection along national highways, inspection of major pipelines, intelligent farming, among others. With this paper, we aim to establish a standard method of georeferencing by proposing the design of a simple, white colored, L-shaped marker along with the pipeline for its detection. In a first, the less common DRGB color space is used along with the RGB color space to segment the characteristic white color of the marker. To carry out recognition, a scale and rotation invariant modification of the edge oriented histogram is used. To allow for accurate histograms, improvements are made on canny edge detection using adaptive approaches and exploiting contour properties. The histogram obtained displayed a characteristic distribution of peaks for GCP-markers. Thus, a new peak-detection and verification methodology is also proposed based on the normalized cross-correlation. Finally, a CNN model is trained on the Regions of Interest around the GCP-markers that are received after the filtering. The results from EOH and CNN were then used for classification. Regions with a diverse range of locality, terrain, soil quality were chosen to test the pipeline developed. The results of the design and the pipeline combined were quite impressive, with regards to the accuracy of detection as well as its reproducibility in diverse geographical locations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Oniga, V.-E., Breaban, A.-I., Statescu, F.: Determining the optimum number of ground control points for obtaining high precision results based on UAS images. In: Proceedings vol. 2, no. 7 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tiwari, A., Dixit, A.: Unmanned aerial vehicle and geospatial technology pushing the limits of development. Am. J. Eng. Res. (AJER) 4, 16–21 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eltohamy, F., Hamza, E.H.: Effect of ground control points location and distribution on geometric correction accuracy of remote sensing satellite images (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tucker, C.J., Grant, D.M., Dykstra, J.D.: NASA’s global orthorectified Landsat dataset. Photogram. Eng. Remote Sens. 70, 313–322 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Koeln, G.T., Dykstra, J.D., Cunningham, J.: Geocover and Geocover-LC: orthorectified Landsat TM/MSS data and derived land cover for the world (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Armston, J.D., Danaher, T.J., Goulevitch, B.M., Byrne, M.I.: Geometric correction of Landsat MSS, TM, and ETM+ imagery for mapping of woody vegetation cover and change detection in Queensland (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liba, N., Berg-Jürgens, J.: Accuracy of orthomosaic generated by different methods in example of UAV platform MUST Q. In: Proceedings of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Landau, H., Chen, X., Klose, S., Leandro, R., Vollath, U.: Trimble’s Rtk And DGPS solutions in comparison with precise point positioning. In: Sideris, M.G. (eds.) Observing our Changing Earth. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 133. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alhamlan, S., Mills, J.P., Walker, A.S., Saks, T.: The influence of ground control points in the triangulation of Leica Ads 40 Data (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, K.-L., Chun, H.-W., Lee, H.-N.: Ground control points acquisition using spot image - the operational comparison. In: International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. XXXIII, Part B3. Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou, G.: Determination of ground control points to subpixel accuracies for rectification of spot imagery (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ren, H., Li, Z.: Object detection using edge histogram of oriented gradient. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Paris, pp. 4057–4061 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nguyen, T.: Optimal ground control points for geometric correction using genetic algorithm with global accuracy. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 48, 101–120 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., Haffner, P.: Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 86(11), 2278–2324 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tahar, K.N., Ahmad, A., Abdul, W., Wan, A., Akib, M., Mohd, W., Wan, N.: Assessment on ground control points in unmanned aerial system image processing for slope mapping studies. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 3, 1–10 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hinton, G.E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R.R.: Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0580 (2012)

  17. Federman, A., Santana Quintero, M., Kretz, S., Gregg, J., Lengies, M., Ouimet, C., Laliberte, J.: Uav photogrammetric workflows: a best practice guideline. In: ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLII-2/W5.237-244 (2017).https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w5-237-2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huo, Y.-K., Wei, G., Zhang, Y., Wu, L.: An adaptive threshold for the canny operator of edge detection. In: International Conference on Image Analysis and Signal Processing, Zhejiang, pp. 371–374 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fang, M., Yue, G., Yu, Q.: The study on an application of Otsu method in canny operator (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Canny, J.: A Computational Approach to Edge Detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI-8(6), 679–698 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ioffe, S., Szegedy, C.: Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03167 (2015)

  22. Diederik, P., Kingma, J.B.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

  23. Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.N.: Support vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20, 273–297 (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Ballard, D.H.: Generalizing the hough transform to detect arbitrary shapes. Pattern Recogn. 13, 111–122 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ullman, S.: Visual routines. In: Cognition, vol. 18, pp. 97–159 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  26. David, G.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vision 60(2), 91–110 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mori, G., Belongie, S., Malik, J.: Efficient shape matching using shape contexts. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 27, 1832–1837 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hu, M.-K.: Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants. IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 8(2), 179–187 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Viola, P., Jones, M.: Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dalal, N., Triggs, B.: Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Olson, E.: AprilTag: a robust and flexible visual fiducial system. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radha Saraf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jain, A., Mahajan, M., Saraf, R. (2020). Standardization of the Shape of Ground Control Point (GCP) and the Methodology for Its Detection in Images for UAV-Based Mapping Applications. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S. (eds) Advances in Computer Vision. CVC 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 943. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17795-9_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics