Advertisement

Vertebral Body Compression Fracture Detection

  • Ahmet İlhanEmail author
  • Şerife Kaba
  • Enver Kneebone
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 943)

Abstract

The spinal column is one of the crucial parts of the human anatomy and the essential function of this column is the protection of the spinal cord. Each part of the individual bones to compose the spinal column is called vertebra. Vertebral compression fracture is one of the types of fractures that occur in the spinal column. This fracture type causes loss of bone density alongside with pain and loss of mobility. In recent years, image processing is an effective tool that is widely used in the analysis of medical images. In this study, a novel system is proposed for the detection of vertebral body compression fracture using spine CT images. The sagittal plane is used in these CT images. For the detection of the fracture, the heights of the longest and shortest heights of the vertebral bodies are measured using image processing techniques. The aim of this study is to develop an automated system to help radiology specialists by facilitating the process of vertebral fracture diagnosis. The proposed system detected the fractured vertebrae successfully in all images that are used in this study.

Keywords

Vertebra Compression fracture Image processing 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Esses, S.I., McGuire, R., Jenkins, J., Finkelstein, J., Woodard, E., Watters, W.C., Goldberg, M.J., Keith, M., Turkelson, C.M., Wies, J.L., Sluka, P.: The treatment of osteoporotic spinal compression fractures. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 93(20), 1934–1936 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Klinder, T., Ostermann, J., Ehm, M., Franz, A., Kneser, R., Lorenz, C.: Automated model-based vertebra detection, identification, and segmentation in CT images. Med. Image Anal. 13(3), 471–482 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patrick, J., Indu, M.G.: A semi-automated technique for vertebrae detection and segmentation from CT images of spine. In: International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (ComNet), pp. 44–49. IEEE, July 2016Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barbieri, P.D., Pedrosa, G.V., Traina, A.J.M., Nogueira-Barbosa, M.H.: Vertebral body segmentation of spine MR images using superpixels. In: 28th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers–IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghosh, S., Raja’S, A., Chaudhary, V., Dhillon, G.: Automatic lumbar vertebra segmentation from clinical CT for wedge compression fracture diagnosis. In: Medical Imaging 2011: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, vol. 7963, p. 796303. International Society for Optics and Photonics, March 2011Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dhawan, V., Sethi, G., Lather, V.S., Sohal, K.: Power law transformation and adaptive gamma correction: a comparative study. Int. J. Electron. Commun. Technol. 4(2), 118–123 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Senthilkumaran, N., Vaithegi, S.: Image segmentation by using thresholding techniques for medical images. Comput. Sci. Eng.: Int. J. 6(1), 1–13 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abinaya, G., Banumathi, R., Seshasri, V., Kumar, A.N.: Rectify the blurred license plate image from fast moving vehicles using morphological process. In: IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Instrumentation and Communication Engineering (ICEICE 2017), pp. 1–6. IEEE, April 2017Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saikumar, T., Yugander, P., Murthy, P.S., Smitha, B.: Image segmentation algorithm using watershed transform and fuzzy C-Means clustering on level set method. Int. J. Comput. Theor. Eng. 5(2), 209 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Soille, P.: Texture analysis. In: Morphological Image Analysis, pp. 317–346. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: Digital Image Processing. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ilhan, U., Ilhan, A.: Brain tumor segmentation based on a new threshold approach. Proc. Comput. Sci. 120, 580–587 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dantzig, G.B., Thapa, M.N.: Linear Programming 1: Introduction. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer EngineeringNear East UniversityNicosia, TRNC, Mersin 10Turkey
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical EngineeringNear East UniversityNicosia, TRNC, Mersin 10Turkey
  3. 3.LETAM EMAR Radiology Clinic, Radiology ConsultantNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations