Skip to main content

Assessing the Usability of a Chatbot for Mental Health Care

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Internet Science (INSCI 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11551))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to assess the usability of a chatbot for mental health care within a social enterprise. Chatbots are becoming more prevalent in our daily lives, as we can now use them to book flights, manage savings, and check the weather. Chatbots are increasingly being used in mental health care, with the emergence of “virtual therapists”. In this study, the usability of a chatbot named iHelpr has been assessed. iHelpr has been developed to provide guided self-assessment, and tips for the following areas: stress, anxiety, depression, sleep, and self esteem. This study used a questionnaire developed by Chatbottest, and the System Usability Scale to assess the usability of iHelpr. The participants in this study enjoyed interacting with the chatbot, and found it easy to use. However, the study highlighted areas that need major improvements, such as Error Management and Intelligence. A list of recommendations has been developed to improve the usability of the iHelpr chatbot.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://dev.botframework.com/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.luis.ai.

  3. 3.

    https://botsociety.io/.

  4. 4.

    https://azure.microsoft.com/en-gb/services/cognitive-services/spell-check/.

References

  1. Shevat, A.: Designing Bots: Creating Conversational Experiences. O’Reilly Media Inc., Newton (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kayak. https://www.kayak.com/messenger. Accessed 2 Aug 2018

  3. Plum. https://withplum.com/. Accessed 2 Aug 2018

  4. Følstad, A., Brandtzæg, P.B.: Chatbots and the new world of HCI. Interactions 24(4), 39–42 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cameron, G., et al.: Towards a chatbot for digital counselling. In: Proceedings of the 31st British Computer Society Human Computer Interaction Conference, p. 24. BCS Learning & Development Ltd., Sunderland (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2017.24

  6. Cameron, G., et al.: Best practices for designing chatbots in mental healthcare - a case study on iHelpr. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Human Computer Interaction Conference (2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2018.129

  7. Cameron, G., et al.: Back to the future: lessons from knowledge engineering methodologies for chatbot design and development. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Human Computer Interaction Conference (2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2018.153

  8. Stevenson, D., Farmer, P.: Thriving at work: the Stevenson/Farmer review of mental health and employers (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Investors in People: Managing Mental Health in the Workplace 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miner, A., et al.: Conversational agents and mental health: theory-informed assessment of language and affect. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Human Agent Interaction, pp. 123–130. ACM (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2974804.2974820

  11. Bhakta, R., Savin-Baden, M., Tombs, G.: Sharing secrets with robots? In: EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, pp. 2295–2301. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kavakli, M., Li, M., Rudra, T.: Towards the development of a virtual counselor to tackle students’ exam stress. J. Integr. Des. Process Sci. 16(1), 5–26 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3233/jid-2012-0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fitzpatrick, K.K., Darcy, A., Vierhile, M.: Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health 4(2) (2017). https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.7785

  14. X2ai.com. http://x2ai.com/. Accessed 2 Aug 2018

  15. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., Mermelstein, R.: Perceived stress scale. In: Measuring Stress: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. New Economics Foundation. https://neweconomics.org/2008/10/five-ways-to-wellbeing-the-evidence/. Accessed 2 Aug 2018

  17. Lund, A.M.: Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. STC Usability SIG Newsl. 8(2), 3–6 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kirakowski, J., Corbett, M.: SUMI: the software usability measurement inventory. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 24(3), 210–212 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brooke, J.: SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A., McClelland, I.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194. Taylor and Francis, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Coperich, K., Cudney, E., Nembhard, H.: Continuous improvement study of chatbot technologies using a human factors methodology. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Industrial and Systems Engineering Conference (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kocaballi, A.B., Laranjo, L., Coiera, E.: Measuring user experience in conversational interfaces: a comparison of six questionnaires. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Human Computer Interaction Conference (2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2018.21

  22. Chatbottest. http://chatbottest.com/. Accessed 3 Aug 2018

  23. Callejas, Z., López-Cózar, R., Ábalos, N., Griol, D.: Affective conversational agents: the role of personality and emotion in spoken interactions. In: Conversational Agents and Natural Language Interaction: Techniques and Effective Practices, pp. 203–222. IGI Global, Hershey (2011). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-617-6.ch009

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has been supported by UK Knowledge Transfer Partnership under KTP grant ID 1022267.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gillian Cameron .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cameron, G. et al. (2019). Assessing the Usability of a Chatbot for Mental Health Care. In: Bodrunova, S., et al. Internet Science. INSCI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11551. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17705-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17705-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17704-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17705-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics