Skip to main content

The Other Side of Recovery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Public and Private Management of Grief
  • 328 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter considers what the ‘other side’ of recovery from bereavement could be, drawing together conclusions from empirical research on the possibility of ‘non-recovery’ and what happens when people fail to recover. First, Pearce summarises her argument for an alternative way of theorising grief that seeks to look beyond psychological theories and to highlight the role of relationality and ambivalence in understanding both grief and the subjectivity of the bereaved person. Second, Pearce attends to the concept of ‘non-recovery’ to argue for the importance of acknowledging the failure to recover. Third, she concludes the search for the ‘complicated griever’ and questions whether the notion is a construct or a reality. The closing sections look to the future of bereavement care research and practice, outlining the theoretical and practical implications of the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Árnason, Arnar. 1998. “‘Feel the Pain’: Death, Grief and Bereavement Counselling in the North East of England.” Unpublished Doctoral thesis, Durham University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, Des, and Felicity Callard. 2014. “Social Science and Neuroscience Beyond Interdisciplinarity: Experimental $entanglements.” Theory, Culture & Society 32 (1): 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, Jeffrey. 2008. “What Is ‘No Recovery?’” Death Studies 32 (1): 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, Annemarie. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, Mary-Frances. 2005. “Bereavement and the Brain: Invitation to a Conversation Between Bereavement Researchers and Neuroscientists.” Death Studies 29 (10): 905–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. “Immunological and Neuroimaging Biomarkers of Complicated Grief.” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 14 (2): 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, Caroline, and Colin Murray Parkes. 2017. “Bridging the Divides in Bereavement Research: A Conversation with Colin Murray Parkes.” Mortality 22 (3): 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Nikolas. 2013. “The Human Sciences in a Biological Age.” Theory, Culture & Society 30: 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Victor. 1969. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gennep, Arthur. 1960. The Rites of Passage. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Pearce .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pearce, C. (2019). The Other Side of Recovery. In: The Public and Private Management of Grief. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17662-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17662-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17661-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17662-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics