Reversible Proofs of Sequential Work
- 1.2k Downloads
Proofs of sequential work (PoSW) are proof systems where a prover, upon receiving a statement \(\chi \) and a time parameter T computes a proof \(\phi (\chi ,T)\) which is efficiently and publicly verifiable. The proof can be computed in T sequential steps, but not much less, even by a malicious party having large parallelism. A PoSW thus serves as a proof that T units of time have passed since \(\chi \) was received.
In this work we construct a new simple PoSW in the random permutation model which is almost as simple and efficient as [CP18] but conceptually very different. Whereas the structure underlying [CP18] is a hash tree, our construction is based on skip lists and has the interesting property that computing the PoSW is a reversible computation.
The fact that the construction is reversible can potentially be used for new applications like constructing proofs of replication. We also show how to “embed” the sloth function of Lenstra and Weselowski [LW17] into our PoSW to get a PoSW where one additionally can verify correctness of the output much more efficiently than recomputing it (though recent constructions of “verifiable delay functions” subsume most of the applications this construction was aiming at).
- [Fis18]Fisch, B.: PoReps: proofs of space on useful data. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2018/678 (2018)Google Scholar
- [Fis19]Fisch, B.: Tight proofs of space and replication. In: Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT 2019 (2019)Google Scholar
- [FMPS19]De Feo, L., Masson, S., Petit, C., Sanso, A.: Verifiable delay functions from supersingular isogenies and pairings. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2019/166, 2019. https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/166
- [HKT11]Holenstein, T., Künzler, R., Tessaro, S.: The equivalence of the random oracle model and the ideal cipher model, revisited. In: Proceedings of the Forty-third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2011, pp. 89–98, ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
- [May93]May, T.C.: Timed-release crypto (1993). http://www.hks.net/cpunks/ cpunks-0/1460.html
- [MMV13]Mahmoody, M., Moran, T., Vadhan, S.: Publicly verifiable proofs of sequential work. In: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, ITCS 2013, pp. 373–388, ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
- [Pie19a]Pietrzak, K.: Proofs of catalytic space. In: 10th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, ITCS 2019, 10–12 January 2019, San Diego, California, USA, pp. 59:1–59:25 (2019)Google Scholar
- [Pie19b]Pietrzak, K.: Simple verifiable delay functions. In: 10th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, ITCS 2019, 10–12 January 2019, San Diego, California, USA, pp. 60:1–60:15 (2019). https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/627
- [RSW00]Rivest, R.L., Shamir, A., Wagner, D.: Time-lock puzzles and timed-release crypto. Technical report MIT/LCS/TR-684, MIT, February 2000Google Scholar
- [Wes19]Wesolowski, B.: Efficient verifiable delay functions. In: Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT 2019 (2019)Google Scholar