Encountering Algebra pp 33-69 | Cite as

# Participation and Mathematization in Introductory Algebra Classrooms: The Case of Sweden

- 162 Downloads

## Abstract

In the Swedish classrooms of this study, teachers valued student participation and student engagement in mathematical activities. Students were consistently given opportunities to communicate and to voice their ideas. Students shared their work in the context of the whole class, which they seemed happy to do, and they were praised by the teachers for their efforts and participation. Mathematical tasks and activities offered students opportunities to discuss in small groups, to investigate using manipulatives and to engage in creative processes. However, we saw little evidence of the process of mathematizing in terms of making connections and conjectures at an algebraic level. On most occasions during these early lessons, the participants engaged in the specific and concrete work of manipulating objects and finding correct answers rather than in attempting to address the problems as instances of algebraic reasoning involving variables and equations.

## References

- Carlgren, I., Klette, K., Mýrdal, S., Schnack, K., & Simola, H. (2006). Changes in Nordic teaching practices: From individualised teaching to the teaching of individuals.
*Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50*(3), 301–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Carlsson, S., Liljegren, G., & Picetti, M. (2004).
*Matte Direkt Borgen 6B [Maths Directly The Castle]*. Stockholm: Bonniers.Google Scholar - Emanuelsson, J., & Sahlström, F. (2008). The price of participation: Teacher control versus student participation in classroom interaction.
*Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52*(2), 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Freudenthal, H. (1968). Why to teach mathematics so as to be useful.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1*(1), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Freudenthal, H. (1991).
*Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures*. Hingham, MA: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Goffman, E. (1981).
*Forms of talk*. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar - Gresalfi, M., Martin, T., Hand, V., & Greeno, J. (2008). Constructing competence: An analysis of student participation in the activity systems of mathematics classrooms.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70*, 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hansson, Å. (2010). Instructional responsibility in mathematics education: Modelling classroom teaching using Swedish data.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75*(2), 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hansson, Å. (2011).
*Ansvar för matematiklärande, effekter av undervisning i det flerspråkiga klassrummet [Responsibility for mathematics learning, effects of instructional responsibility in the multilingual calssroom]*. Gothenburg: ACTA Universitatis Gothenburgensis.Google Scholar - Johansson, M. (2006).
*Teaching mathematics with textbooks.*Diss., Luleå University of Technology, Luleå.Google Scholar - Kazemi, E., & Stipek, D. (2001). Promoting conceptual thinking in four upper-elementary mathematics classrooms.
*The Elementary School Journal, 102*(1), 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kilhamn, C., & Hillman, T. (2015). Structural and pedagogical diversity in Swedish Grade six algebra classrooms. In O. Helenius, et al. (Eds.),
*Development of mathematics teaching; design, scale, effects. Proceedings of the 9th Research Seminar of the Swedish Society for Research in Mathematics Education*. Madif 9 i Umeå 2014. Linköping: SMDF.Google Scholar - Littleton, K., & Mercer, N. (2013).
*Interthinking: Putting talk to work*. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar - Mason, J., Graham, A., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2005).
*Developing thinking in algebra*. London: Sage.Google Scholar - Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2004).
*Fundamental constructs in mathematics education*. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar - Niss, M. (2003). Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics. The Danish KOM Project. In A. Gagatses et al. (Eds.),
*The 3rd Mediterranean Conference on Mathematical Education*(pp. 115–124). Athens: Hellenic Mathematical Society.Google Scholar - Palmér, H. (2013).
*To become, or not to become, a primary school mathematics teacher: A study of novice teachers’ professional identity development*. Diss., Linneaus University Press, Växjö.Google Scholar - Rystedt, E., Kilhamn, C., & Helenius, O. (2016). What’s there in an
*n*?*Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 21*(1), 5–26.Google Scholar - Skolverket. (2003).
*Lusten att lära—med fokus på matematik [The desire to learn—Focussing mathematics]*(Report 221). Stockholm: Skolverket.Google Scholar - Skolverket. (2011a).
*Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the leisure-time centre 2011*. Retrieved July 20, 2012, from http://www.skolverket.se/publications - Skolverket. (2011b).
*Laborativ matematik, konkretiserande undervisning och matematikverkstäder [Experiment-based mathematics, embodied teaching and mathematics workshops]*(Report 366). Stockholm: Skolverket.Google Scholar - Skolverket. (2012).
*Likvärdig utbildning i svensk skola: en kvantitativ analys av likvärdighet över tid [Equal education in Swedish school: A quantitative analysis of equality over time]*. Stockholm: Skolverket.Google Scholar - Treffers, A. (1987).
*Three dimensions: A model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction—The Wiskobas Project*. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).
*Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes*. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar - Wood, T., Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1991). Change in teaching mathematics: A case study.
*American Educational Research Journal, 28*(3), 587–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27*, 458–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar