The VIDEOMAT Project: Theoretical Considerations and Methodological Procedures



The VIDEOMAT project builds on analyses of early algebra teaching and learning in four different countries, Finland, Norway, Sweden and the USA (California). The first lessons of algebra teaching in schools in the four settings have been recorded and analyzed. The data collections followed a similar structure in all classrooms. Teachers were recruited and asked to contact the research teams when they began teaching the curricular unit of algebra, and the first four lessons of each class in each country were recorded. In addition, a fifth lesson, involving group work on a patterning task, was documented in all classrooms. In total, the corpus consists of 80 lessons. In addition, there are teacher interviews, focus groups and other materials available. The point of this book is to report features of the organization of classroom activities in algebra that stood out as typical of the four participating countries, and to report on similarities and differences.


  1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  4. Daniels, H. (2008). Vygotsky and research. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kilhamn, C., & Röj-Lindberg, A.-S. (2013). Seeking hidden dimensions of algebra teaching through video analysis. In B. Grevholm, P. S. Hundeland, K. Juter, K. Kislenko, & P.-E. Persson (Eds.), Nordic research in mathematics education, past, present and future (pp. 299–328). Oslo: Cappelen Damm.Google Scholar
  6. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue. Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Linell, P. (2011). Samtalskulturer: Vol. 1 [Conversation cultures]. Studies in Language and Culture, 18. Linköping: Linköping University.Google Scholar
  9. Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. Schiefflin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43–72). New York, NY: Academic.Google Scholar
  10. Reinhardtsen, J. (2012). The introduction of algebra: Comparative studies of textbooks in Finland, Norway, Sweden and USA (Master’s thesis at the University of Agder). Kristiansand: University of Agder.Google Scholar
  11. Säljö, R. (2019). Materiality, learning and cognitive practices—Artefacts as instruments of thinking. In T. Cerrato Pargman & I. Jahnke (Eds.), Emergent practices and material conditions in learning and teaching with technologies (pp. 31–52). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  14. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech (N. Minick, Trans.). In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  15. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wertsch, J. V., & Addison Stone, C. (1985). The concept of internalization in Vygotsky’s account of the genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 162–179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Wertsch, J. V., & Kazak, S. (2011). Saying more than you know in instructional settings. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), Theories of learning in studies of instructional practice (pp. 153–166). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education, Communication and LearningUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations