Skip to main content

Urosepsis: Pathogenesis and Treatment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Role of Bacteria in Urology
  • 974 Accesses

Abstract

Urosepsis is a life-threatening infection that results from the interaction of microorganisms, predominantly bacteria and bacterial products with the innate immune system. The response of the host to the infection is disordered, resulting in a clinically unstable patient. Pathogen factors include the virulence of particular bacterial strains/subtypes which produce toxins, most commonly components of the bacterial cell wall, that amplify the host immune response, leading to life threatening organ dysfunction. Patient factors that may contribute to the development of urosepsis include a compromised immune system incapable of effectively clearing infection, as seen in patients with uncontrolled HIV or patients taking chronic immunosuppression (i.e. chronic steroid use). Certain urologic conditions, specifically the obstruction of urinary flow secondary to urolithiasis or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), can result in the rapid development of urosepsis. Successful management of urosepsis requires early identification of clinical symptoms, prompt fluid resuscitation, administration of antibiotics, and relief of obstruction of the urinary tract.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wagenlehner FM, Pilatz A, Weidner W. Urosepsis – from the view of the urologist. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;38(Suppl):51–7. PubMed PMID: 21993485.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS international sepsis definitions conference. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(4):1250–6. PubMed PMID: 12682500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(3):486–552. PubMed PMID: 28098591.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, Seymour CW, Liu VX, Deutschman CS, et al. Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):775–87. PubMed PMID: 26903336. Pubmed Central PMCID: 4910392.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the working group on sepsis-related problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(7):707–10. PubMed PMID: 8844239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wagenlehner FM, Tandogdu Z, Bjerklund Johansen TE. An update on classification and management of urosepsis. Curr Opin Urol. 2017;27(2):133–7. PubMed PMID: 27846034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, Brunkhorst FM, Rea TD, Scherag A, et al. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):762–74. PubMed PMID: 26903335. Pubmed Central PMCID: 5433435.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Brun-Buisson C. The epidemiology of the systemic inflammatory response. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26(Suppl 1):S64–74. PubMed PMID: 10786961.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Serniak PS, Denisov VK, Guba GB, Zakharov VV, Chernobrivtsev PA, Berko EM, et al. The diagnosis of urosepsis. Urol Nefrol. 1990;(4):9–13. PubMed PMID: 1703366. Diagnostika urosepsisa.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenthal EJ. Epidemiology of septicaemia pathogens. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2002;127(46):2435–40. PubMed PMID: 12432483. Epidemiologie von Septikamie-Erregern1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Johansen TE, Cek M, Naber KG, Stratchounski L, Svendsen MV, Tenke P, et al. Hospital acquired urinary tract infections in urology departments: pathogens, susceptibility and use of antibiotics. Data from the PEP and PEAP-studies. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006;28(Suppl 1):S91–107. PubMed PMID: 16829052.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tapper H, Herwald H. Modulation of hemostatic mechanisms in bacterial infectious diseases. Blood. 2000;96(7):2329–37. PubMed PMID: 11001879.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Joel Gustavo Gómez-Núñez UMA, Fernández F, Gutiérrez-Aceves J, López-Marín LM, Loske AM. Infected urinary stones, endotoxins and urosepsis, clinical management of complicated urinary tract infection. In: Nikibakhsh A, editor. From Clinical Management of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection: InTech; 2011. https://doi.org/10.5772/21996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Triantafilou M, Triantafilou K. The dynamics of LPS recognition: complex orchestration of multiple receptors. J Endotoxin Res. 2005;11(1):5–11. PubMed PMID: 15826372.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Taudorf S, Krabbe KS, Berg RM, Pedersen BK, Moller K. Human models of low-grade inflammation: bolus versus continuous infusion of endotoxin. Clin Vaccine Immunol: CVI. 2007;14(3):250–5. PubMed PMID: 17267590. Pubmed Central PMCID: 1828854.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Calandra T, Glauser MP, Schellekens J, Verhoef J. Treatment of gram-negative septic shock with human IgG antibody to Escherichia coli J5: a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial. J Infect Dis. 1988;158(2):312–9. PubMed PMID: 3136210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Girardin E, Grau GE, Dayer JM, Roux-Lombard P, Lambert PH. Tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-1 in the serum of children with severe infectious purpura. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(7):397–400. PubMed PMID: 3135497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1368–77. PubMed PMID: 11794169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoddick W, Jeffrey RB, Goldberg HI, Federle MP, Laing FC. CT and sonography of severe renal and perirenal infections. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983;140(3):517–20. PubMed PMID: 6600545.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Christoph F, Weikert S, Muller M, Miller K, Schrader M. How septic is urosepsis? Clinical course of infected hydronephrosis and therapeutic strategies. World J Urol. 2005;23(4):243–7. PubMed PMID: 16187116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kreger BE, Craven DE, McCabe WR. Gram-negative bacteremia. IV. Re-evaluation of clinical features and treatment in 612 patients. Am J Med. 1980;68(3):344–55. PubMed PMID: 6987871.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kreger BE, Craven DE, Carling PC, McCabe WR. Gram-negative bacteremia. III. Reassessment of etiology, epidemiology and ecology in 612 patients. Am J Med. 1980;68(3):332–43. PubMed PMID: 6987870.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Singh N, Yu VL. Rational empiric antibiotic prescription in the ICU. Chest. 2000;117(5):1496–9. PubMed PMID: 10807841.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Byl B, Clevenbergh P, Kentos A, Jacobs F, Marchant A, Vincent JL, et al. Ceftazidime- and imipenem-induced endotoxin release during treatment of gram-negative infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001;20(11):804–7. PubMed PMID: 11783697.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Luchi M, Morrison DC, Opal S, Yoneda K, Slotman G, Chambers H, et al. A comparative trial of imipenem versus ceftazidime in the release of endotoxin and cytokine generation in patients with gram-negative urosepsis. Urosepsis Study Group. J Endotoxin Res. 2000;6(1):25–31. PubMed PMID: 11061029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Magill SS, Swoboda SM, Johnson EA, Merz WG, Pelz RK, Lipsett PA, et al. The association between anatomic site of Candida colonization, invasive candidiasis, and mortality in critically ill surgical patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;55(4):293–301. PubMed PMID: 16698215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Binelli CA, Moretti ML, Assis RS, Sauaia N, Menezes PR, Ribeiro E, et al. Investigation of the possible association between nosocomial candiduria and candidaemia. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12(6):538–43. PubMed PMID: 16700702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Guidet B, Aegerter P, Gauzit R, Meshaka P, Dreyfuss D, Group CU-RS. Incidence and impact of organ dysfunctions associated with sepsis. Chest. 2005;127(3):942–51. PubMed PMID: 15764780.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bin C, Hui W, Renyuan Z, Yongzhong N, Xiuli X, Yingchun X, et al. Outcome of cephalosporin treatment of bacteremia due to CTX-M-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;56(4):351–7. PubMed PMID: 16934430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Alhambra A, Cuadros JA, Cacho J, Gomez-Garces JL, Alos JI. In vitro susceptibility of recent antibiotic-resistant urinary pathogens to ertapenem and 12 other antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;53(6):1090–4. PubMed PMID: 15117925.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gorelov S, Zedan F, Startsev V. The choice of urinary drainage in patients with ureteral calculi of solitary kidneys. Arch Ital Urol Androl: Organo Ufficiale Soc Ital Ecografia Urol Nefrol Assoc Ric Urol. 2004;76(2):56–8. PubMed PMID: 15270414.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hsu JM, Chen M, Lin WC, Chang HK, Yang S. Ureteroscopic management of sepsis associated with ureteral stone impaction: is it still contraindicated? Urol Int. 2005;74(4):319–22. PubMed PMID: 15897696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Malek RS, Elder JS. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: a critical analysis of 26 cases and of the literature. J Urol. 1978;119(5):589–93. PubMed PMID: 660725.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hudson MA, Weyman PJ, van der Vliet AH, Catalona WJ. Emphysematous pyelonephritis: successful management by percutaneous drainage. J Urol. 1986;136(4):884–6. PubMed PMID: 3761452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dutta D, Shivaprasad KS, Kumar M, Biswas D, Ghosh S, Mukhopadhyay P, et al. Conservative management of severe bilateral emphysematous pyelonephritis: case series and review of literature. Ind J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;17(Suppl 1):S329–32. PubMed PMID: 24251204. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3830350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shu T, Green JM, Orihuela E. Renal and perirenal abscesses in patients with otherwise anatomically normal urinary tracts. J Urol. 2004;172(1):148–50. PubMed PMID: 15201757.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Arrabal-Polo MA, Jimenez-Pacheco A, Arrabal-Martin M. Percutaneous drainage of prostatic abscess: case report and literature review. Urol Int. 2012;88(1):118–20. PubMed PMID: 21934282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Susanibar Napuri LF, Simon Rodriguez C, Lopez Martin L, Monzo Gardinier J, Cabello Benavente R, Gonzalez Enguita C. Prostatic abscess: diagnosis and treatment of an infrequent urological entity. Arch Esp Urol. 2011;64(1):62–6. PubMed PMID: 21289388.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shyam DC, Rapsang AG. Fournier’s gangrene. Surg:J R Coll Surg Edinb Irel. 2013;11(4):222–32. PubMed PMID: 23578806.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kymora B. Scotland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bidnur, S., Scotland, K.B. (2019). Urosepsis: Pathogenesis and Treatment. In: Lange, D., Scotland, K. (eds) The Role of Bacteria in Urology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17542-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17542-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17541-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17542-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics