Abstract
Dr. Thomas Stahovich gave a keynote in the morning of the first day of the conference. He showed how researchers have long sought to understand the effects of study skills on academic achievement but found no consistent relationship between them. Dr. Stahovich explained that this is due, in part, to the use of research methods that rely on surveys and students’ self-reports of study habits. In his work, he overcomes this limitation by using smartpens and an instrumented document viewer to objectively measure studying. This combination of technology provides a fine-grained view of the learning process not available with conventional assessment methods and enables the use of data mining to examine the relationship between studying and achievement. In his talk he presented novel data mining techniques, as well as the results of several studies that reveal new insights about the relationship between traditional learning activities—completing homework, taking lecture notes, and reading—and performance in introductory engineering courses. Finally, Dr. Stahovich discussed interventions that are based on these insights and are designed to improve student engagement and increase academic achievement. This chapter provides an edited transcription of that keynote. Thank you to David Hoeft for videotaping the sessions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
References
Andrade J (2010) What does doodling do? Appl Cogn Psychol Off J Soc Appl Res Mem Cogn 24(1):100–106
Blumner HN, Richards HC (1997) Study habits and academic achievement of engineering students. J Eng Educ 86:125–132
Gyllen J, Stahovich T, Mayer R (2018) How students read an e-textbook in an engineering course. J Comput Assist Learn 34(6):701–712
Harari GM, Gosling SD, Wang R, Chen F, Chen Z, Campbell AT (2017) Patterns of behavior change in students over an academic term: a preliminary study of activity and sociability behaviors using smartphone sensing methods. Comput Hum Behav 67:129–138
Hestenes D, Wells M, Swackhamer G (1992) Force concept inventory. Phys Teacher 30(3):141–158
Inc P (2019) Portfolium. https://portfolium.com/. Accessed 23 Feb 23, 2019
Jones L, Ruch GM (1928) The twenty-seventh yearbook of the national society for the study of education: nature and nurture, part II-their influence upon achievement. In: Whipple GM (ed) Achievement as affected by amount of time spent in study. Public School Publishing Co, Bloomington, IL, pp 131–134
Lee W, de Silva R, Peterson EJ, Calfee RC, Stahovich TF (2008) Newton’s pen: a pen-based tutoring system for statics. Comput Graph 32(5):511–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2008.05.009
Rawson K, Stahovich TF, Mayer RE (2017) Homework and achievement: using smartpen technology to find the connection. J Educ Psychol 109(2):208
Schuman H, Walsh E, Olson C, Etheridge B (1985) Effort and reward: the assumption that college grades are affected by quantity of study. Soc Forces 63(4):945–966
Steif PS, Dantzler JA (2005) A statics concept inventory: development and psychometric analysis. J Eng Edu 94(4):363–371
Strauss V (2016) A new wrinkle in the research about the real value of homework. https://wapo.st/29kXIEr?tid=ss_mail&utm_term=.4beadca49de8
Van Arsdale T, Stahovich T (2012) Does neatness count? What the organization of student work says about understanding. In: Proceedings of the 2012 American society for engineering education annual conference and exposition
van Gog T (2013) Time on task. In: Hattie J, Anderman EM (eds) Educational psychology handbook series. International guide to student achievement. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York, pp 423–433
Wang R (2019) Student life study. http://studentlife.cs.dartmouth.edu/. Accessed 23 Feb 2019
Acknowledgements
This work was conducted at the University of California Riverside. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Numbers 0935239, 1432820, and 1612511. Thank you to David Hoeft for videotaping the sessions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stahovich, T. (2019). The Quantified Student: Using Smartpens and Data Mining to Understand Student Learning and Achievement. In: Hammond, T., Prasad, M., Stepanova, A. (eds) Inspiring Students with Digital Ink. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17398-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17398-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17397-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17398-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)