Skip to main content

The ‘Rational Individual’: Rational Paradigms of Obligation

  • 100 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter Brown considers the dominant means of approaching the issue of Political Obligation, an approach he terms the Rational Approach. Assuming the citizens of a political community are primarily motivated by reason, this approach argues that Political Obligation can, and should, be understood and justified against the paradigmatic framework of ‘reason’. Whilst acknowledging strengths to this approach, Brown ultimately argues the Rational Approach suffers a fundamental flaw in its ability to comprehend the relationship between citizen and State. This flaw is that, assuming its own perspective is that of ‘reason’, opposing views are by virtue ‘irrational’ and ‘unintelligible’. Subsequently unable to comprehend and engage with opposing perspectives, these are instead devalued and dismissed through degrading labels such as ‘savagery’ and ‘barbarism’. In short, the Rational Approach limits itself in its ability comprehend perspectives of Political Obligation which fall out-with its normative paradigm of ‘what is rational’.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bacon, F. (1985). The Essays (J. Pitcher, Ed.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (2005). A Fragment on Government (R. Harrison, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (2007). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Mineola: Dover Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosanquet, B. (2012). The Philosophical Theory of State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • British Government, Union with Scotland Act. (1707). Available at legislation.gov.uk. www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Ann/6/11/contents.

  • Broom, J. (1973). John Maclean. MacDonald Publishers: Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, G. (2006). A Dialogue on the Law of Kingship Among the Scots (R. A. Mason & M. S. Smith, Eds.). Edinburgh: The Saltire Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero, M. T. (2008). The Republic and the Laws (N. Rudd & J. Powell, Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R. G. (2005). The New Leviathan or Man, Society, Civilisation and Barbarism (D. Boucher, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, J. (2007). Scotland Re-formed, 1488–1587. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egoumenides, M. (2014). Philosophical Anarchism and Political Obligation. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. H. (1906). Prolegomena to Ethics. Charleston: Bibliolife.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. H. (1986a). Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation. In P. Harris & J. Morrow (Eds.), T. H. Green: Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. H. (1986b). Lecture on Liberal Legislation and Freedom of Contract. In P. Harris & J. Morrow (Eds.), T. H. Green: Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. H. (1986c). On Loyalty. In P. Harris & J. Morrow (Eds.), T. H. Green: Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. H. (2003). Temperance and Freedom. In P. Nicholson (Ed.), T. H. Green: Miscellaneous Writings, Speeches and Letters. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotius, H. (2005). The Rights of War & Peace (Vols. 1–3, R. Tuck, Ed.). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. (1973). Bentham and the Demystification of the Law. The Modern Law Review, 36(1), 2–17.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1991). The Philosophy of History (J. Sibree, Ed.). New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1998). The English Reform Bill. In Z. A. Pelcynski (Ed.), Hegel’s Political Writings. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (2008). Outlines of the Philosophy of Right (S. Houlgate, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1990). Behemoth or the Long Parliament (S. Holmes, Ed.). London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (2008). Leviathan (J. C. A. Gaskin, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, J. (2010). Political Obligation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, J. (2017). What Might It Mean for Political Theory to Be More ‘Realistic’? Philosophia, 45(2), 487–501.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • James, Viscount of Stair. (1981). The Institutions of the Law of Scotland (D. M. Walker, Ed.). Bristol: Western Printing Services Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1996). An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment? In M. Gregor (Ed.), Immanual Kant: Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (2010). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (M. Gregor, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, D. (2010). Political Obligation: A Critical Introduction. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenman, B. (1995). Integration and Enlightenment: Scotland, 1746–1832. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livy, T. (2008). The Rise of Rome: Books 1–5 (T. J. Luce, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1997). Essays on the Law of Nature. In M. Goldie (Ed.), Locke: Political Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1998). Two Treatise of Government (P. Laslett, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. (2008). Discourses on Livy (J. Bondanella & P. Bondanella, Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. (2009). The Prince (T. Parks, Ed.). London: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (2002). A Short History of Ethics: A History of Moral Philosophy from the Homeric Age to the Twentieth Century. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclean, J. (2003). Speech from the Dock. Available at the Marxist Internet Archive. https://www.marxist.org/archive/maclean/works/1918-dock.htm.

  • Marshall, E. (1999). General Principles of Scots Law. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, W. (1960). The Appin Murder and the Trial of James Stewart: A New Survey of a Historic Mystery. London: J. M. P. Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (2008). On Liberty. In J. Gary (Ed.), John Stuart Mill: On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, P. P. (1990). The Political Philosophy of the British Idealists: Selected Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott, M. (1967). Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. London: The Trinity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutarch. (1906). Plutarch’s Lives (Vol. 1) (A. H. Clough, Ed.). Boston: Little, Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polybius. (2010). The Histories (R. Waterfield & B. McGing, Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J. J. (1968). The Social Contract (M. Cranston, Ed.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Government. 2010. Criminal Justice and Licensing Act (Scotland). Available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2010/13/contents.

  • Scruton, R. (1990). The Philosopher on Dover Beach. Manchester: Carcanet Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, L. (1988). What Is Political Philosophy? And Other Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viroli, M. (2010). Machiavelli’s God (A. Shugaar, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetstone, A. (1981). Scottish County Government in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. Edinburgh: John Donald Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruairidh J. Brown .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brown, R.J. (2019). The ‘Rational Individual’: Rational Paradigms of Obligation. In: Political Encounters. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17340-1_2

Download citation