Advertisement

Sustainable, Smart, and Data-Driven Approaches to Urbanism and their Integrative Aspects: A Qualitative Analysis of Long-Lasting Trends

  • Simon Elias BibriEmail author
Chapter
  • 471 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)

Abstract

Smart sustainable/sustainable smart cities, a defining context for ICT for sustainability, have recently become the leading global paradigm of urbanism. With this position, they are increasingly gaining traction and prevalence worldwide as a promising response to the mounting challenges of sustainability and the potential effects of urbanization. In the meantime, the research in this area is garnering growing attention and rapidly burgeoning, and its status is consolidating as one of the most enticing areas of investigation today. A large part of research in this area focuses on exploiting the potentials and opportunities of advanced technologies and their novel applications, especially big data computing, as an effective way to mitigate or overcome the issue of sustainable cities and smart cities being extremely fragmented as landscapes and weakly connected as approaches. In this context, one of the most appealing strands of research in the domain of smart sustainable urbanism is that which is concerned with futures studies related to the planning and development of new models for smart sustainable cities. Not only in the futures studies using a backcasting approach to strategic planning and development, but also in those using other approaches, is trend analysis a necessary step to perform and a critical input to the scenario analysis as part of such studies. With that in regard, this chapter aims to provide a detailed qualitative analysis of the key forms of trends shaping and driving the emergence, materialization, and evolvement of the phenomenon of smart sustainable cities as a leading paradigm of urbanism, as well as to identify the relevant expected developments related to smart sustainable urbanism. It is more likely that these forms of trends reflect a congeries of long-lasting forces behind the continuation of smart sustainable cities as a set of multiple approaches to, and multiple pathways to achieving, smart sustainable urban development. As part of the futures studies related to smart sustainable city planning and development using a backcasting methodology, both the trends and expected developments are key ingredients of, and crucial inputs for, analyzing different alternative scenarios for the future or long-term visions pertaining to desirable sustainable futures in terms of their opportunities, potentials, environmental and social benefits, and other effects. This study serves to provide a necessary material for scholars, researchers, and academics, as well as other futurists, who are in the process of conducting, or planning to carry out, futures research projects or scholarly backcasting endeavors related to the field of smart sustainable urbanism.

Keywords

Smart sustainable/sustainable smart cities Sustainable cities Smart cities Smarter cities Big data computing Sustainability Sustainable development Trends Futures studies Backcasting 

References

  1. Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017). What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities, 60, 234–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Nasrawi, S., Adams, C., & El-Zaart, A. (2015). A conceptual multidimensional model for assessing smart sustainable cities. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 12(3), 541–558.Google Scholar
  4. Al Nuaimi, E., Al Neyadi, H., Nader, M., & Al-Jaroodi, J. (2015). Applications of big data to smart cities. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 6(25), 1–15.Google Scholar
  5. Angelidou, M., Psaltoglou, A., Komninos, N., Kakderi, C., Tsarchopoulos, P., & Panori, A. (2017). Enhancing sustainable urban development through smart city applications. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 1–25.Google Scholar
  6. Banister, D., & Stead, D. (2004). The impact of ICT on transport. Transport Reviews, 24(5), 611–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Batty, M. (1989). Technology highs. The Guardian, 29.Google Scholar
  8. Batty, M. (1990). Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 17, 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Batty, M. (1997). International Planning Studies, 2, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Batty, M. (2013). Big data, smart cities and city planning. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3(3), 274–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., et al. (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214, 481–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bell, G., Hey, T., & Szalay, A. (2009). Computer science: Beyond the data deluge. Science, 323(5919), 1297–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37, 407–429.Google Scholar
  14. Bettencourt, L. M. A. (2014). The uses of big data in cities. Santa Fe, New Mexico: Santa Fe Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bibri, S. E. (2015). The shaping of ambient intelligence and the internet of things: Historico-epistemic, socio-cultural, politico-institutional and eco-environmental dimensions. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bibri, S. E. (2018a). Smart sustainable cities of the future: The untapped potential of big data analytics and context aware computing for advancing sustainability. Berlin, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bibri, S. E. (2018b). The IoT for smart sustainable cities of the future: An analytical framework for sensor-based big data applications for environmental sustainability. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 230–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bibri, S. E. (2018c). A foundational framework for smart sustainable city development: Theoretical, disciplinary, and discursive dimensions and their synergies. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 758–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bibri, S. E. (2018d). Backcasting in futures studies: A synthesized scholarly and planning approach to strategic smart sustainable city development. European Journal of Futures Research, 2–27.Google Scholar
  20. Bibri, S. E. (2019a). On the sustainability of smart cities of the future and related big data applications: An interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary review and synthesis. Journal of Big Data (in press).Google Scholar
  21. Bibri, S. E. (2019b). A novel model for smart sustainable city of the future: A scholarly backcasting approach to its analysis, investigation, and development. CITA (in press).Google Scholar
  22. Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2016). On the social shaping dimensions of smart sustainable cities: A study in science, technology, and society. Sustainable Cities and Society, 29, 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2017a). Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31, 183–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2017b). ICT of the new wave of computing for sustainable urban forms: Their big data and context-aware augmented typologies and design concepts. Sustainable Cities and Society, 32, 449–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2017c). The core enabling technologies of big data analytics and context-aware computing for smart sustainable cities: A review and synthesis. Journal of Big Data.Google Scholar
  26. Bijker, W. E. (1995). Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of socio-technical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function, and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1, 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmen, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31, 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Carlsson-Kanyama, A., Dreborg, K. H., Eenkhorn, B. R., Engström, R., & Falkena, B. (2003). Images of everyday life in the future sustainable city: Experiences of back-casting with stakeholders in five European cities (The Environmental Strategies Research Group (Fms)—report 182). Stockholm, Sweden: The Royal Institute of Technology. Report available at: react-text www.infra.kth.sereact-text:563.
  30. Chaminade, C., & Edquist, C. (2010). Inside the public scientific system: Changing modes of knowledge production. In R. Smits, P. Shapira, & S. Kehlmann (Eds.), The theory and practice of innovation policy: An international research handbook (pp. 95–114). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  31. Chatterjee, K., & Gordon, A. (2006). Planning for an unpredictable future: Transport in Great Britain in 2030. Transport Policy, 13(2006), 254–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., et al. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 2289–2297).  https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.615.
  33. Clark, W. C. (2007). Sustainability science: A room of its own. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 1737–1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Clark, W. C., & Dickson, N. M. (2003). Sustainability science: The emerging research program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(14), 8059–8061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Commission of European Communities. (1990). Green paper on the urban environment. Eur 12902. Brussels, EEC.Google Scholar
  36. Dameri, R., & Cocchia, A. (2013). Smart city and digital city: Twenty years of terminology evolution. In: X Conference of the Italian Chapter of AIS, ITAIS 2013 (p. 18). Milan (Italy): Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi.Google Scholar
  37. European Commission. (2011). Cities of tomorrow. Challenges, visions, ways forward. Publications Office of the European Union, Brussels.Google Scholar
  38. Dreborg, K. H. (1996). Essence of backcasting. Futures, 28(9), 813–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fan, W., & Bifet, A. (2013). Mining big data: Current status, and forecast to the future. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 14(2), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 897–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Geels, F. W. (2005). Technological transitions and system innovations: A co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Girardet, H. (2008). Cities, people, planet: Urban development and climate change. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. Handy, S. (1996). Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environmen, 2(2), 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hofstad, H. (2012). Compact city development: High ideals and emerging practices. European Journal of Spatial Development, 1–23.Google Scholar
  46. Höjer, M., & Wangel, S. (2015). Smart sustainable cities: Definition and challenges. In L. Hilty & B. Aebischer (Eds.), ICT innovations for sustainability (pp. 333–349). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Holmberg, J. (1998). Backcasting: A natural step in operationalizing sustainable development. Greener Management International (GMI), 23, 30–51.Google Scholar
  48. Holmberg, J., & Robèrt, K. H. (2000). Backcasting from non-overlapping sustainability principles: A framework for strategic planning. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 74, 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. International Telecommunications Union (ITU). (2014). Agreed definition of a smart sustainable city. In Focus Group on Smart Sustainable Cities, SSC-0146 version, Geneva, March 5–6.Google Scholar
  50. Jabareen, Y. R. (2006). Sustainable urban forms: Their typologies, models, and concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26, 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jenks, M., Burton, E., & Williams, K. (1996a). A sustainable future through the compact city? Urban intensification in the United Kingdom. Environment by Design, 1(1), 5–20.Google Scholar
  52. Jenks, M., Burton, E., & Williams, K. (Eds.). (1996b). The compact city: A sustainable urban form? London: E & FN Spon Press.Google Scholar
  53. Jimenez, C. E., Solanas, A., & Falcone, F. (2014). E-government interoperability: Linking open and smart government. Computer, 47(10), 22–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Joss, S. (2010). Eco-cities—A global survey 2009. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 129, 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Joss, S. (2011). Eco-cities: The mainstreaming of urban sustainability—Key characteristics and driving factors. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 6(3), 268–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Joss, S., Cowley, R., & Tomozeiu, D. (2013). Towards the ubiquitous eco-city: An analysis of the internationalisation of eco-city policy and practice. Journal of Urban Research & Practice, 76, 16–22.Google Scholar
  57. Jucevicius, R., Patašienė, I., & Patašius, M. (2014). Digital dimension of smart city: Critical analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 146–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kates, R., Clark, W., Corell, R., Hall, J., & Jaeger, C. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kemp, R. (1997). Environmental policy and technical change: A comparison of the technological impact of policy instruments. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  60. Kemp, R., & Rotmans, J. (2005). The management of the co-evolution of technical, environmental and social systems. In M. Weber & J. Hemmelskamp (Eds.), Towards environmental innovation systems. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  61. Khan, Z., Anjum, A., Soomro, K., & Tahir, M. A. (2015). Towards cloud based big data analytics for smart future cities. Journal of Cloud Computing: Advances, Systems and Applications, 4(2).Google Scholar
  62. Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kitchin, R. (2015). Data-Driven, Networked Urbanism. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2641802.
  64. Kitchin, R. (2016). The ethics of smart cities and urban science. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 374, 20160115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kramers, A., Höjer, M., Lövehagen, N., & Wangel, J. (2014). Smart sustainable cities: Exploring ICT solutions for reduced energy use in cities. Environmental Modelling and Software, 56, 52–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kramers, A., Wangel, J., & Höjer, M. (2016). Governing the smart sustainable city: The case of the Stockholm Royal Seaport. In Proceedings of ICT for Sustainability 2016 (Vol. 46, pp. 99–108). Amsterdam: Atlantis Press.Google Scholar
  67. Kumar, A., & Prakash, A. (2014). The role of big data and analytics in smart cities. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(14), 12–23.Google Scholar
  68. Kyriazis, D., Varvarigou, T., Rossi, A., White, D., & Cooper, J. (2014). Sustainable smart city IoT applications: Heat and electricity management and eco-conscious cruise control for public transportation. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 14th International Symposium and Workshops on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), Madrid, Spain (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  69. Laney, D. (2001). 3-D data management: Controlling data volume, velocity and variety. META Group Research Note.Google Scholar
  70. Lee, K. (2000). Global sustainable development: Its intellectual and historical roots: Global sustainable development in the 21st century (pp. 31–47). Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Lytras, M. D., & Visvizi, A. (2018). Who uses smart city services and what to make of them: Toward interdisciplinary smart cities research. Sustainability, 10(6), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Malik, P. (2013). Big data: Principles and practices. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 57, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Manyika, J., Chiu, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., et al. (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute.Google Scholar
  74. Miola, A. (2008). Backcasting approach for sustainable mobility. European Commission, Joint Research Center, Institute for Environment and Sustainability.Google Scholar
  75. Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A. C., Mangano, G., & Scorrano, F. (2014). Current trends in smart city initiatives—Some stylized facts. Cities, 38, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. OECD. (2002). OECD Guidelines towards environmentally sustainable transport. OECD, Paris Phdungsilp A (2011) Futures studies’ backcasting method used for strategic sustainable city planning. Futures, 43(7), 707–714.Google Scholar
  77. Pantelis, K., & Aija, L. (2013). Understanding the value of (big) data. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (pp. 38–42). IEEE.Google Scholar
  78. Perera, C., Zaslavsky, A., Christen, P., & Georgakopoulos, D. (2014). Sensing as a service model for smart cities supported by internet of things. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 1–12.Google Scholar
  79. Phdungsilp, A. (2011). Futures studies’ backcasting method used for strategic sustainable city planning. Futures, 43(7), 707–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Piro, G., Cianci, I., Grieco, L. A., Boggia, G., & Camarda, P. (2014). Information centric services in smart cities. Journal of Systems and Software, 88, 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Quist, J., Rammelt, C., Overschie, M., & de Werk, G. (2006). Backcasting for sustainability in engineering education: The case of Delft University of Technology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 868–876.Google Scholar
  82. Rånge, M., & Sandberg, M. (2015). Windfall gains or eco-innovation? “Green” evolution in the Swedish innovation system. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 1–20.Google Scholar
  83. Rapoport, E., & Vernay, A. L. (2011). Defining the eco-city: A discursive approach. Paper presented at the management and innovation for a sustainable built environment conference, international eco-cities initiative, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (pp. 1–15).Google Scholar
  84. Rathore, M. M., Paul, A., Hong, W.-H., Seo, H. C., Awan, I., & Saeed, S. (2018). Exploiting IoT and big data analytics: Defining smart digital city using real-time urban data. Sustainable Cities and Society, 40, 600–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Register, R. (2002). Eco-cities: Building cities in balance with nature. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Hills Books.Google Scholar
  86. Robinson, J. (1982). Energy backcasting—A proposed method of policy analysis. Energy Policy, 12, 337–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Roseland, M. (1997). Dimensions of the eco-city. Cities, 14(4), 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3(1).Google Scholar
  89. Shepard, M. (Ed.). (2011). Sentient city: Ubiquitous computing, architecture and the future of urban space. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  90. Shin, D. (2009). Ubiquitous city: Urban technologies, urban infrastructure and urban informatics. Journal of Information Science, 35(5), 515–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Smith, A. (2003). Transforming technological regimes for sustainable development: A role for alternative technology niches? Science and Public Policy, 30(2), 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Smolan, R., & Erwitt, J. (2012). The human face of big data. New York: Sterling.Google Scholar
  93. Su, K., Li, J., & Fu, H. (2011). Smart city and the applications. In 2011 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Control (ICECC) (pp. 1028–1031). IEEE.Google Scholar
  94. Thrift, N. (2014). The ‘sentient’ city and what it may portend. Big Data & Society, 1, 2053951714532241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Townsend, A. (2013). Smart cities—Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  96. UNECE. (2015, October). The UNECE–ITU smart sustainable cities indicators.Google Scholar
  97. United Nations. (2014). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision, highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). New York: United States of America.  https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2005.12.9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. United Nations. (2015). Big data and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Prepared by A. Maaroof. Available at: www.unescap.org/events/call-participants-big-data-and-2030-agenda-sustainable-development-achieving-development.
  99. Van Bueren, E., van Bohemen, H., Itard, L., & Visscher, H. (2011). Sustainable urban environments: An ecosystem approach. Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  100. Webb, J., Hawkey, D., & Tingey, M. (2016). Governing cities for sustainable energy: The UK case. Cities, 54, 28–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.10.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. West, G. F. (2013). Big data needs a big theory to go with it. Scientific American. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=big-data-needs-big-theory. Viewed November 16, 2016.
  102. Wheeler, S. M., & Beatley, T. (Eds.). (2010). The sustainable urban development reader. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  103. Whitehead, M. (2003). (Re)analyzing the sustainable city: Nature, urbanism and the regulation of socio-environmental relations in the UK. Urban Studies, 40(7), 1183–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Williams, K. (2009). Sustainable cities: Research and practice challenges. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 1(1), 128–132.Google Scholar
  105. Williams, K., Burton, E., & Jenks, M. (Eds.). (2000). Achieving sustainable urban form. London: E & FN Spon.Google Scholar
  106. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future (The Brundtland report). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Zanella, A., Bui, N., Castellani, A., Vangelista, L., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(1).Google Scholar
  108. Zikopoulos, P. C., Eaton, C., deRoos, D., Deutsch, T., & Lapis, G. (2012). Understanding big data. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Department of Urban Planning and DesignNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations