Disturbance Management and Information Availability in Public Transport, with Focus on Scania County, Sweden

  • Å. JevingerEmail author
  • J. A. Persson
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)


In order for people to choose public transport over private car usage, public transport systems must be both reliable and accessible, which is not always the case today. Based on interviews with public transport actors, this paper investigates the missing information and communication flows during unplanned disturbances in the public transport system of southern Sweden. Two potential solution approaches to supply the missing information are also identified: an information system common for all public transport actors in the region, and a traveler check-in system, providing traveler specific information to the actors. The information requirements of both systems, and their potential benefits, are presented. The primary objective of the study is to improve the possibilities for both actors and travelers to act during unplanned disturbances by more efficient information sharing and better traveler information.


Public transport Information systems Information flow Traveler information 



This research was done in collaboration with K2—The Swedish Knowledge Centre for Public Transport.


  1. Ezzedine, H., Bonte, T., Kolski, C., & Tahon, C. (2008). Integration of traffic management and traveller information systems: Basic principles and case study in intermodal transport system management. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 3(3), 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Jevinger, Å., and Persson, J. A. (2016). Information-based Disturbance Management for Public Transport, project report 1.
  3. Mejía, J. A. S., Gutiérrez, A. A. O., & Mejía, S. E. (2015). Technological web platform for integrated public transport system (SITP) of the West Center Metropolitan Area in Colombia. In Proceedings of the 2015 CHILEAN Conference on Electrical, Electronics Engineering, Information and Communication Technologies. Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
  4. Nikolić, M., Teodorović, D., & Vukadinović, K. (2015). Disruption management in public transit: The bee colony optimization approach. Transportation Planning and Technology, 38(2), 162–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. O’Sullivan, P. J., & Patel, T. (2004). Fragmentation in transport operations and the case for system integrity. Transport Policy, 11(3), 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ronald, N., Thompson, R., Haasz, J., & Winter, S. (2013). Determining the viability of a demand-responsive transport system under varying demand scenarios. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science. Orlando, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Sørensen, C. H., & Longva, F. (2011). Increased coordination in public transport—Which mechanisms are available? Transport Policy, 18(1), 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sveriges Riksdag. (2015). Lag (2015:953) om kollektivtrafikresenärers rättigheter.
  9. Törnquist, J. (2006). Computer-based decision support for railway traffic scheduling and dispatching: A review of models and algorithms. In Proceedings of Algorithmic Methods and Models for Optimization of Railways. Zürich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  10. Trafikanalys. (2014). Local and regional public transport, statistic rapport 2015:20.
  11. Zito, P., Amato, G., Amoroso, S., & Berrittella, M. (2011). The effect of Advanced Traveller Information Systems on public transport demand and its uncertainty. Transportmetrica, 7(1), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Media TechnologyMalmö UniversityMalmöSweden
  2. 2.K2—The Swedish Knowledge Centre for Public TransportLundSweden

Personalised recommendations