Advertisement

Telling Queer Tales: Narration and Genealogical Time in William Faulkner and Angela Carter

Chapter
  • 255 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter considers the relationship between genealogical time and literature. As critics have noted, the passing of time is often measured by charting the paternal lines through generations of reproduction. Because genealogy is a rich site to examine temporality, novels with an emphasis on family history provide an opportunity to consider the intersection between sexuality and narrative time. This chapter focuses on William Faulkner’s Absalom, Absalom! and Angela Carter’s Wise Children and demonstrates how each novel considers how time might function if other kinship relations were prioritized over that of father/son. Absalom Absalom! considers sibling relations, while Wise Children considers avuncular relations. The chapter ultimately argues that each text employs a queer form of narration in order to enter a temporality not defined by genealogy.

References

  1. Boone, Joseph Allen. 1998. Libidinal Currents: Sexuality and the Shaping of Modernism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brooks, Peter. 1984. Incredulous Narration: Absalom, Absalom. In Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  3. Carter, Angela. 1967. The Magic Toyshop. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1991. Wise Children. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. Deleyto, Celestino. 1995. ‘We Are No Angels’: Woman Versus History in Angela Carter’s Wise Children. In Telling Histories: Narrativizing, Historicizing Literature. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  6. Edelman, Lee. 2004. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Faulkner, William. 1936. Absalom, Absalom. New York: Random.Google Scholar
  8. Gamble, Sarah. 2001. The Fiction of Angela Carter. Cambridge: Icon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gopinath, Gayatri. 2005. Impossible Desires: Queer Diasporas and South Asian Public Cultures. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hardin, Michael. 1994. The Other Other: Self-Definition Outside Patriarchal Institutions in Angela Carter’s Wise Children. The Review of Contemporary Fiction 14 (3): 77–83.Google Scholar
  11. Hayase, Hironori. 1990. Sibling Incest in Absalom, Absalom! Kyushu American Literature 31: 97–111.Google Scholar
  12. Hegerfeldt, Anne. 2003. The Stars That Spring from Bastardising: Wise Children Go for Shakespeare. Anglia 121 (3): 351–372.Google Scholar
  13. Hickman, Alan Forrest. 1998. It’s a Wise Child: Teaching the Lessons of History in the Contemporary British Novel. Publications of the Arkansas Philological Association 24 (1): 31–46.Google Scholar
  14. Irwin, John T. 2003. Repetition and Revenge. In William Faulkner’s Absalom, Absalom! ed. Fred Hobson, 47–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  16. Owens, Craig. 1994. “Outlaws: Gay Men in Feminism.” Beyond Recognition: Representation, Power, and Culture. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 1993. “Tales of the Avunculate: Queer Tutelage in The Importance of Being Earnest.” In Tendencies, 52–72. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Tobin, Patricia Drechsel. 1978. Time and the Novel: The Genealogical Imperative. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Walter, David. 2007. Strange Attractions: Sibling Love Triangles in Faulkner’s Absolom, Absolom! and Balzac’s La Fille aux yeux d’or. Comparative Literature Studies 44 (4): 484–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Webb, Kate. 2000. Seriously Funny: Wise Children. In The Flesh and the Mirror: Essays on the Art of Angela Carter, ed. Lorna Sage, 279–307. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  21. Zender, Karl F. 1998. Faulkner and the Politics of Incest. American Literature: A Journal of Literary History, Criticism, and Bibliography 70 (4): 739–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Mary WashingtonFredericksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations