Skip to main content

An Ontological Framework for the Analysis of Constructively Aligned Educational Units

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Manufacturing II (MANUFACTURING 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Higher education institutions are increasingly abandoning traditional teaching methods based on transmissive pedagogy and embracing a model based on the constructivist theory of learning. This is a necessary shift to face current challenges in their domain such as shrinking resources and need to reach students with different level of motivation and learning styles. Constructive Alignment (CA) combines the new pedagogical approach with aligned design for outcome-based teaching education and it is the leading approach underpinning current requirements for program specification and single course description. Another important trend emerging from digitalization of higher education is the collection and use of educational data to improve all the aspects of the learning process. This research community has produced a large body of valuable tools and methods, but there is no specific contribution targeting the analysis of constructively aligned education. The CONALI ontology is an ongoing modelling effort that currently provides a framework to describe the CA body of knowledge including all the relevant semantic relationships. This paper presents a new version of such ontology that supports collection and analysis of educational data from constructively aligned educational units as a first step to fill the gap described above. The specific requirements for this iterative upgrade have been inferred from a literature review of the typical analysis conducted in the domain of educational big data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cooper, P.A.: Paradigm shifts in designed instruction: from behaviorism to cognitivism to constructivism. Educ. Technol. 33(5), 12–19 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ertmer, P.A., Newby, T.J.: Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Perform. Improv. Q. 6(4), 50–72 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biggs, J.: Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. High. Educ. 32(3), 347–364 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Biggs, J.: What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 18(1), 57–75 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maffei, A., et al.: CONALI ontology. A framework for design and evaluation of constructively aligned courses in higher education: putting in focus the educational goal verbs (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Siemens, G.: Learning analytics: envisioning a research discipline and a domain of practice. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Siemens, G., d Baker, R.S.: Learning analytics and educational data mining: towards communication and collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Papamitsiou, Z., Economides, A.A.: Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice: a systematic literature review of empirical evidence. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 17(4), 49–64 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Romero, C., Ventura, S.: Data mining in education. Wiley Interdisc. Rev.: Data Min. Knowl. Discovery 3(1), 12–27 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson, L.W., et al.: A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Abridged Edition. Longman, White Plains (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bloom, B.S., et al.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, vol. 19, p. 56. David McKay, New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krathwohl, D.R.: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Pract. 41(4), 212–218 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Biggs, J.B., Collis, K.F.: Evaluating the Quality of Learning: the SOLO Taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). Academic Press, Cambridge (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially supported by the “TIPHYS 4.0 – Social Network based doctoral Education on Industry 4.0”, Project No 2017-1-SE01-KA203-03452 funded by ERASMUS+ of the European Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Maffei .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Maffei, A., Boffa, E., Nuur, C. (2019). An Ontological Framework for the Analysis of Constructively Aligned Educational Units. In: Hamrol, A., Grabowska, M., Maletic, D., Woll, R. (eds) Advances in Manufacturing II. MANUFACTURING 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17269-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17269-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17268-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17269-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics