Various Hydropower Plant Models

  • Weijia YangEmail author
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)


In this thesis, various HPP models for different study purposes are developed. For a clearer demonstration and classification of models, they are distinguished from two aspects: (1) the implementation and (2) the generator modelling approach, as shown in Fig. 3.1. In this chapter, numerical Models in TOPSYS and MATLAB, models for theoretical derivation and numerical models in MATLAB for HPPs with Kaplan Turbines are built and presented.


  1. 1.
    Bao H, Yang J, Fu L (2009) Study on nonlinear dynamical model and control strategy of transient process in hydropower station with francis turbine. In: Power and Energy Engineering Conference. APPEEC 2009. Asia-Pacific, 1–6, IEEEGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bao H (2010) Research on setting condition of surge chamber and operation control of the hydropower station (In Chinese). Wuhan University, WuhanGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Streeter VL, Wylie EB (1978) Fluid transients. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang W et al (2015) A mathematical model and its application for hydro power units under different operating conditions. Energies 8:10260–10275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Machowski J, Bialek J, Bumby J (2011) Power system dynamics: stability and control. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kundur P, Balu NJ, Lauby MG (1994) Power system stability and control. McGraw-hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saarinen L, Norrlund P, Lundin U (2016) Tuning primary frequency controllers using robust control theory in a power system dominated by hydropower. In: CIGRE Session 2016Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saarinen L (2017) The frequency of the frequency: on hydropower and grid frequency control. Uppsala UniversityGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ljung L, Glad T (2000) Control theory-multivariable and nonlinear methods. Taylor and FrancisGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    IEEE Guide for the Application of Turbine Governing Systems for Hydroelectric Generating Units. In: IEEE Std 1207-2011 (Revision to IEEE Std 1207-2004), 1-131 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghrist WD III (1986) Floating deadband for speed feedback in turbine load control. (ed. USPTO)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hägglund T (2013) A unified discussion on signal filtering in PID control. Control Eng Pract 21:994–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vander Velde WE (1968) Multiple-input describing functions and nonlinear system design. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Demello F et al (1992) Hydraulic-turbine and turbine control-models for system dynamic studies. IEEE Trans Power Syst 7:167–179Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saarinen L, Norrlund P, Lundin U (2016) Tuning primary frequency controllers using robust control theory in a power system dominated by hydropower. In: CIGRE Session 2016, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kercan V, Djelic V, Rus T, Vujanic V (1996) Experience with Kaplan turbine efficiency measurements–current meters and/or index test flow measurement. In: Proceedings of the IGHEM, Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Adamkowski A, Lewandowski M, Lewandowski S (2014) Selected experiences with optimization tests of the Kaplan-type hydraulic turbines. J Energy Power Eng 8Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang W et al (2018) Burden on hydropower units for short-term balancing of renewable power systems. Nat Commun 9:2633CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Electricity, Department of Engineering SciencesUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.School of Water Resources and Hydropower EngineeringWuhan UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations