Skip to main content

Identifying Tribes on Twitter Through Shared Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Collaborative Innovation Networks

Abstract

This paper introduces Tribefinder, a novel system able to reveal Twitter users’ tribal affiliations. Tribefinder establishes to which tribes individuals belong through the analysis of their tweets and the comparison of their vocabulary. These tribal vocabularies are previously generated based on the vocabulary of tribal influencers and leaders selected using Tribecreator. To demonstrate its functionality, in the case presented in this paper, the system was calibrated in three specific tribal macro-categories: alternative reality, lifestyle, and recreation. Apart from describing the methodology we used to create this system, we also provide some practical examples of its use, thus giving a first indication of its potential. Finally, we present the results of the adoption of a t-SNE visualization approach, useful to verify whether tribe members cluster closely together.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For followers and friends, their tweets are analyzed to understand whether the individual is connected with accounts that post tweets on topics related to the tribe.

References

  • Addis, M., & Podesta, S. (2005). Long life to marketing research: A postmodern view. European Journal of Marketing, 39, 386–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora S, Liang Y, Ma T (2016) A simple but tough-to-beat baseline for sentence embeddings

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1990). Thinking sociologically. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bojanowski P, Grave E, Joulin A, Mikolov T (2016) Enriching word vectors with subword information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringay, S., BĂ©chet, N., Bouillot, F., Poncelet, P., Roche, M., & Teisseire, M. (2011). Towards an on-line analysis of tweets processing. Database and expert systems applications. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, S., & Soboleva, A. (2011). Interactive or reactive? Marketing with Twitter. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28, 491–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canniford, R. (2011). How to manage consumer tribes. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 19, 591–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cova, B. (1996). What postmodernism means to marketing managers. European Management Journal, 14, 494–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cova, B., & Cova, V. (2002). Tribal marketing: The tribalisation of society and its impact on the conduct of marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 36, 595–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cova, B., & Pace, S. (2006). Brand community of convenience products: New forms of customer empowerment–the case “my Nutella The Community”. European Journal of Marketing, 40, 1087–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cova, B., & White, T. (2010). Counter-brand and alter-brand communities: The impact of Web 2.0 on tribal marketing approaches. Journal of Marketing Management, 26, 256–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Oliveira, J. M., & Gloor, P. A. (2018). GalaxyScope: Finding the “Truth of Tribes” on social media. Collaborative innovation networks. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • DionĂ­sio, P., Leal, C., & Moutinho, L. (2008). Fandom affiliation and tribal behaviour: A sports marketing application. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 11, 17–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garry, T., Broderick, A. J., & Lahiffe, K. (2008). Tribal motivation in sponsorship and its influence on sponsor relationship development and corporate identity. Journal of Marketing Management, 24, 959–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulding, C., Shankar, A., & Canniford, R. (2013). Learning to be tribal: Facilitating the formation of consumer tribes. European Journal of Marketing, 47, 813–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, K., & Hewer, P. (2010). Tribal mattering spaces: Social-networking sites, celebrity affiliations, and tribal innovations. Journal of Marketing Management, 26, 271–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzweber, M., Mattsson, J., & Standing, C. (2015). Entrepreneurial business development through building tribes. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 23, 563–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, I. (2011). Principal component analysis. In International encyclopedia of statistical science (pp. 1094–1096). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V. (1999). E-tribalized marketing? The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. European Journal of Marketing, 17, 252–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maaten, L. V. D., & Hinton, G. (2008). Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9, 2579–2605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maffesoli, M. (1996). The time of the tribes. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moutinho, L., DionĂ­sio, P., & Leal, C. (2007). Surf tribal behaviour: A sports marketing application. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 25, 668–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, B. (2013). Tribal marketing, tribal branding: An expert guide to the brand co-creation process. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salton G, McGill MJ (1986) Introduction to modern information retrieval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taute, H. A., & Sierra, J. (2014). Brand tribalism: An anthropological perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 23, 2–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, L., Togneri, R., Liu, W., & Bennamoun, M. (2015). How well sentence embeddings capture meaning. 20th Australasian Document Computing Symposium (p. 9).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Fabrizio Marini, for his help in data collection and tribe annotation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Rovelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gloor, P.A., Fronzetti Colladon, A., de Oliveira, J.M., Rovelli, P., Galbier, M., Vogel, M. (2019). Identifying Tribes on Twitter Through Shared Context. In: Song, Y., Grippa, F., Gloor, P.A., LeitĂŁo, J. (eds) Collaborative Innovation Networks. Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17238-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics